No Effects of Psychosocial Stress on Intertemporal Choice

Intertemporal choices - involving decisions which trade off instant and delayed outcomes - are often made under stress. It remains unknown, however, whether and how stress affects intertemporal choice. We subjected 142 healthy male subjects to a laboratory stress or control protocol, and asked them...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haushofer, Johannes, Cornelisse, Sandra, Seinstra, Maayke, Fehr, Ernst, Joels, Marian, Kalenscher, Tobias
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Public Library of Science 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83525
_version_ 1826212587638882304
author Haushofer, Johannes
Cornelisse, Sandra
Seinstra, Maayke
Fehr, Ernst
Joels, Marian
Kalenscher, Tobias
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
Haushofer, Johannes
Cornelisse, Sandra
Seinstra, Maayke
Fehr, Ernst
Joels, Marian
Kalenscher, Tobias
author_sort Haushofer, Johannes
collection MIT
description Intertemporal choices - involving decisions which trade off instant and delayed outcomes - are often made under stress. It remains unknown, however, whether and how stress affects intertemporal choice. We subjected 142 healthy male subjects to a laboratory stress or control protocol, and asked them to make a series of intertemporal choices either directly after stress, or 20 minutes later (resulting in four experimental groups). Based on theory and evidence from behavioral economics and cellular neuroscience, we predicted a bidirectional effect of stress on intertemporal choice, with increases in impatience or present bias immediately after stress, but decreases in present bias or impatience when subjects are tested 20 minutes later. However, our results show no effects of stress on intertemporal choice at either time point, and individual differences in stress reactivity (changes in stress hormone levels over time) are not related to individual differences in intertemporal choice. Together, we did not find support for the hypothesis that psychosocial laboratory stressors affect intertemporal choice.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T15:26:36Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/83525
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T15:26:36Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/835252022-10-02T02:42:14Z No Effects of Psychosocial Stress on Intertemporal Choice Haushofer, Johannes Cornelisse, Sandra Seinstra, Maayke Fehr, Ernst Joels, Marian Kalenscher, Tobias Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Haushofer, Johannes Intertemporal choices - involving decisions which trade off instant and delayed outcomes - are often made under stress. It remains unknown, however, whether and how stress affects intertemporal choice. We subjected 142 healthy male subjects to a laboratory stress or control protocol, and asked them to make a series of intertemporal choices either directly after stress, or 20 minutes later (resulting in four experimental groups). Based on theory and evidence from behavioral economics and cellular neuroscience, we predicted a bidirectional effect of stress on intertemporal choice, with increases in impatience or present bias immediately after stress, but decreases in present bias or impatience when subjects are tested 20 minutes later. However, our results show no effects of stress on intertemporal choice at either time point, and individual differences in stress reactivity (changes in stress hormone levels over time) are not related to individual differences in intertemporal choice. Together, we did not find support for the hypothesis that psychosocial laboratory stressors affect intertemporal choice. National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (1R01AG039297) 2014-01-06T20:27:52Z 2014-01-06T20:27:52Z 2013-11 2013-03 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1932-6203 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83525 Haushofer, Johannes, Sandra Cornelisse, Maayke Seinstra, Ernst Fehr, Marian Joels, and Tobias Kalenscher. “No Effects of Psychosocial Stress on Intertemporal Choice.” Edited by Mathias Pessiglione. PLoS ONE 8, no. 11 (November 8, 2013): e78597. en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078597 PLoS ONE http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ application/pdf Public Library of Science PLoS
spellingShingle Haushofer, Johannes
Cornelisse, Sandra
Seinstra, Maayke
Fehr, Ernst
Joels, Marian
Kalenscher, Tobias
No Effects of Psychosocial Stress on Intertemporal Choice
title No Effects of Psychosocial Stress on Intertemporal Choice
title_full No Effects of Psychosocial Stress on Intertemporal Choice
title_fullStr No Effects of Psychosocial Stress on Intertemporal Choice
title_full_unstemmed No Effects of Psychosocial Stress on Intertemporal Choice
title_short No Effects of Psychosocial Stress on Intertemporal Choice
title_sort no effects of psychosocial stress on intertemporal choice
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83525
work_keys_str_mv AT haushoferjohannes noeffectsofpsychosocialstressonintertemporalchoice
AT cornelissesandra noeffectsofpsychosocialstressonintertemporalchoice
AT seinstramaayke noeffectsofpsychosocialstressonintertemporalchoice
AT fehrernst noeffectsofpsychosocialstressonintertemporalchoice
AT joelsmarian noeffectsofpsychosocialstressonintertemporalchoice
AT kalenschertobias noeffectsofpsychosocialstressonintertemporalchoice