Human Factors Analysis of Predator B Crash

The 2006 crash of a Predator B in Arizona has prompted a great amount of scrutiny into Unmanned Arial System (UAS) operations. The direct cause of the Predator crash can be tied to an initial failure of the displays and a failed transfer of controls between operators. However, using the Human Factor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carrigan, Geoff, Long, Dave, Cummings, M.L., Duffner, John
Format: Presentation
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84129
_version_ 1811087690501718016
author Carrigan, Geoff
Long, Dave
Cummings, M.L.
Duffner, John
author_facet Carrigan, Geoff
Long, Dave
Cummings, M.L.
Duffner, John
author_sort Carrigan, Geoff
collection MIT
description The 2006 crash of a Predator B in Arizona has prompted a great amount of scrutiny into Unmanned Arial System (UAS) operations. The direct cause of the Predator crash can be tied to an initial failure of the displays and a failed transfer of controls between operators. However, using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), many latent errors that contributed to the accident were uncovered that were not addressed by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) report. The HFACS approach for this accident examined all issues leading up to the crash and uncovered several organizational influences that were significant contributors to the Predator crash. Through augmenting NTSB efforts with the HFACS method, future UAS incidents can be prevented by addressing all causes, regardless of their distance from the pilot’s seat.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T13:50:28Z
format Presentation
id mit-1721.1/84129
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
last_indexed 2024-09-23T13:50:28Z
publishDate 2014
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/841292019-04-11T11:07:58Z Human Factors Analysis of Predator B Crash Carrigan, Geoff Long, Dave Cummings, M.L. Duffner, John Predator B unmanned arial system (UAS) human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) The 2006 crash of a Predator B in Arizona has prompted a great amount of scrutiny into Unmanned Arial System (UAS) operations. The direct cause of the Predator crash can be tied to an initial failure of the displays and a failed transfer of controls between operators. However, using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), many latent errors that contributed to the accident were uncovered that were not addressed by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) report. The HFACS approach for this accident examined all issues leading up to the crash and uncovered several organizational influences that were significant contributors to the Predator crash. Through augmenting NTSB efforts with the HFACS method, future UAS incidents can be prevented by addressing all causes, regardless of their distance from the pilot’s seat. 2014-01-22T16:57:12Z 2014-01-22T16:57:12Z 2008-06-10 Presentation Technical Report http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84129 Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ application/pdf
spellingShingle Predator B
unmanned arial system (UAS)
human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS)
Carrigan, Geoff
Long, Dave
Cummings, M.L.
Duffner, John
Human Factors Analysis of Predator B Crash
title Human Factors Analysis of Predator B Crash
title_full Human Factors Analysis of Predator B Crash
title_fullStr Human Factors Analysis of Predator B Crash
title_full_unstemmed Human Factors Analysis of Predator B Crash
title_short Human Factors Analysis of Predator B Crash
title_sort human factors analysis of predator b crash
topic Predator B
unmanned arial system (UAS)
human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS)
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84129
work_keys_str_mv AT carrigangeoff humanfactorsanalysisofpredatorbcrash
AT longdave humanfactorsanalysisofpredatorbcrash
AT cummingsml humanfactorsanalysisofpredatorbcrash
AT duffnerjohn humanfactorsanalysisofpredatorbcrash