The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply

Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson (2001) established that economic institutions today are correlated with expected mortality of European colonialists. David Albouy argues this relationship is not robust. He drops all data from Latin America and much of the data from Africa, making up almost 60 percent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, Robinson, James A
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: American Economic Association 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/85190
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-7491
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3354-7155
_version_ 1826195134045224960
author Acemoglu, Daron
Johnson, Simon
Robinson, James A
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
Acemoglu, Daron
Johnson, Simon
Robinson, James A
author_sort Acemoglu, Daron
collection MIT
description Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson (2001) established that economic institutions today are correlated with expected mortality of European colonialists. David Albouy argues this relationship is not robust. He drops all data from Latin America and much of the data from Africa, making up almost 60 percent of our sample, despite much information on the mortality of Europeans in those places during the colonial period. He also includes a "campaign" dummy that is coded inconsistently; even modest corrections undermine his claims. We also show that limiting the effect of outliers strengthens our results, making them robust to even extreme versions of Albouy's critiques.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T10:07:53Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/85190
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T10:07:53Z
publishDate 2014
publisher American Economic Association
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/851902022-09-26T15:55:05Z The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply Acemoglu, Daron Johnson, Simon Robinson, James A Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics Sloan School of Management Acemoglu, Daron Johnson, Simon Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson (2001) established that economic institutions today are correlated with expected mortality of European colonialists. David Albouy argues this relationship is not robust. He drops all data from Latin America and much of the data from Africa, making up almost 60 percent of our sample, despite much information on the mortality of Europeans in those places during the colonial period. He also includes a "campaign" dummy that is coded inconsistently; even modest corrections undermine his claims. We also show that limiting the effect of outliers strengthens our results, making them robust to even extreme versions of Albouy's critiques. 2014-02-28T17:15:13Z 2014-02-28T17:15:13Z 2012-10 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0002-8282 1944-7981 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/85190 Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James A Robinson. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply.” American Economic Review 102, no. 6 (October 2012): 3077–3110. Copyright © 2012 by the American Economic Association https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-7491 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3354-7155 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.6.3077 American Economic Review Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf American Economic Association American Economic Association
spellingShingle Acemoglu, Daron
Johnson, Simon
Robinson, James A
The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply
title The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply
title_full The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply
title_fullStr The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply
title_full_unstemmed The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply
title_short The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply
title_sort colonial origins of comparative development an empirical investigation reply
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/85190
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-7491
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3354-7155
work_keys_str_mv AT acemogludaron thecolonialoriginsofcomparativedevelopmentanempiricalinvestigationreply
AT johnsonsimon thecolonialoriginsofcomparativedevelopmentanempiricalinvestigationreply
AT robinsonjamesa thecolonialoriginsofcomparativedevelopmentanempiricalinvestigationreply
AT acemogludaron colonialoriginsofcomparativedevelopmentanempiricalinvestigationreply
AT johnsonsimon colonialoriginsofcomparativedevelopmentanempiricalinvestigationreply
AT robinsonjamesa colonialoriginsofcomparativedevelopmentanempiricalinvestigationreply