The Role of Stocks and Shocks Concepts in the Debate Over Price Versus Quantity
Recent literature showed that the choice between a price or quantity control depends, in part, on the dynamic structure of cost uncertainty. Temporary shocks to abatement cost favors the use of a price control, while permanent shocks favor a quantity control. Unfortunately, the importance of this as...
Main Authors: | Parsons, John E., Taschini, Luca |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Sloan School of Management |
Format: | Article |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
Springer-Verlag
2014
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/85639 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9313-4865 |
Similar Items
-
Stocks & Shocks: A Clarification in the Debate Over Price vs. Quantity Controls for Greenhouse Gases
by: Parsons, John E., et al.
Published: (2011) -
The price vs quantity debate: climate policy and the role of business cycles
by: Grodecka, A, et al.
Published: (2014) -
A Comparison of Reduced-Form Permit Price Models and their Empirical Performances
by: Taschini, Luca, et al.
Published: (2010) -
The role of stock market volatility in predicting macroeconomic quantities.
by: Leong, Florence Mei Hua., et al.
Published: (2013) -
The Pricing Debate over Russian Gas Exports to China
by: Henderson, J
Published: (2011)