Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us?

Very little. A plethora of integrated assessment models (IAMs) have been constructed and used to estimate the social cost of carbon (SCC) and evaluate alternative abatement policies. These models have crucial flaws that make them close to useless as tools for policy analysis: certain inputs (e.g., t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pindyck, Robert S.
Other Authors: Sloan School of Management
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: American Economic Association 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/88036
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8296-9875
_version_ 1826216518695780352
author Pindyck, Robert S.
author2 Sloan School of Management
author_facet Sloan School of Management
Pindyck, Robert S.
author_sort Pindyck, Robert S.
collection MIT
description Very little. A plethora of integrated assessment models (IAMs) have been constructed and used to estimate the social cost of carbon (SCC) and evaluate alternative abatement policies. These models have crucial flaws that make them close to useless as tools for policy analysis: certain inputs (e.g., the discount rate) are arbitrary, but have huge effects on the SCC estimates the models produce; the models' descriptions of the impact of climate change are completely ad hoc, with no theoretical or empirical foundation; and the models can tell us nothing about the most important driver of the SCC, the possibility of a catastrophic climate outcome. IAM-based analyses of climate policy create a perception of knowledge and precision, but that perception is illusory and misleading.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T16:48:58Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/88036
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T16:48:58Z
publishDate 2014
publisher American Economic Association
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/880362022-10-03T08:29:11Z Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us? Pindyck, Robert S. Sloan School of Management Pindyck, Robert S. Very little. A plethora of integrated assessment models (IAMs) have been constructed and used to estimate the social cost of carbon (SCC) and evaluate alternative abatement policies. These models have crucial flaws that make them close to useless as tools for policy analysis: certain inputs (e.g., the discount rate) are arbitrary, but have huge effects on the SCC estimates the models produce; the models' descriptions of the impact of climate change are completely ad hoc, with no theoretical or empirical foundation; and the models can tell us nothing about the most important driver of the SCC, the possibility of a catastrophic climate outcome. IAM-based analyses of climate policy create a perception of knowledge and precision, but that perception is illusory and misleading. 2014-06-19T19:36:15Z 2014-06-19T19:36:15Z 2013-09 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0022-0515 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/88036 Pindyck, Robert S. “Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us?” Journal of Economic Literature 51, no. 3 (September 2013): 860–872. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8296-9875 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.3.860 Journal of Economic Literature Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf American Economic Association American Economic Association
spellingShingle Pindyck, Robert S.
Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us?
title Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us?
title_full Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us?
title_fullStr Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us?
title_full_unstemmed Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us?
title_short Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us?
title_sort climate change policy what do the models tell us
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/88036
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8296-9875
work_keys_str_mv AT pindyckroberts climatechangepolicywhatdothemodelstellus