Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation
Sentence processing theories typically assume that the input to our language processing mechanisms is an error-free sequence of words. However, this assumption is an oversimplification because noise is present in typical language use (for instance, due to a noisy environment, producer errors, or per...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | en_US |
| Published: |
National Academy of Sciences (U.S.)
2014
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/88255 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1013-1461 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5912-883X |
| _version_ | 1811095272639430656 |
|---|---|
| author | Gibson, Edward A. Bergen, Leon Piantadosi, Steven T. |
| author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences |
| author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Gibson, Edward A. Bergen, Leon Piantadosi, Steven T. |
| author_sort | Gibson, Edward A. |
| collection | MIT |
| description | Sentence processing theories typically assume that the input to our language processing mechanisms is an error-free sequence of words. However, this assumption is an oversimplification because noise is present in typical language use (for instance, due to a noisy environment, producer errors, or perceiver errors). A complete theory of human sentence comprehension therefore needs to explain how humans understand language given imperfect input. Indeed, like many cognitive systems, language processing mechanisms may even be “well designed”–in this case for the task of recovering intended meaning from noisy utterances. In particular, comprehension mechanisms may be sensitive to the types of information that an idealized statistical comprehender would be sensitive to. Here, we evaluate four predictions about such a rational (Bayesian) noisy-channel language comprehender in a sentence comprehension task: (i) semantic cues should pull sentence interpretation towards plausible meanings, especially if the wording of the more plausible meaning is close to the observed utterance in terms of the number of edits; (ii) this process should asymmetrically treat insertions and deletions due to the Bayesian “size principle”; such non-literal interpretation of sentences should (iii) increase with theperceived noise rate of the communicative situation and (iv) decrease if semantically anomalous meanings are more likely to be communicated. These predictions are borne out, strongly suggesting that human language relies on rational statistical inference over a noisy channel. |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-23T16:14:21Z |
| format | Article |
| id | mit-1721.1/88255 |
| institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| language | en_US |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-23T16:14:21Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | National Academy of Sciences (U.S.) |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | mit-1721.1/882552022-10-02T07:11:41Z Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation Gibson, Edward A. Bergen, Leon Piantadosi, Steven T. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy Gibson, Edward A. Bergen, Leon Sentence processing theories typically assume that the input to our language processing mechanisms is an error-free sequence of words. However, this assumption is an oversimplification because noise is present in typical language use (for instance, due to a noisy environment, producer errors, or perceiver errors). A complete theory of human sentence comprehension therefore needs to explain how humans understand language given imperfect input. Indeed, like many cognitive systems, language processing mechanisms may even be “well designed”–in this case for the task of recovering intended meaning from noisy utterances. In particular, comprehension mechanisms may be sensitive to the types of information that an idealized statistical comprehender would be sensitive to. Here, we evaluate four predictions about such a rational (Bayesian) noisy-channel language comprehender in a sentence comprehension task: (i) semantic cues should pull sentence interpretation towards plausible meanings, especially if the wording of the more plausible meaning is close to the observed utterance in terms of the number of edits; (ii) this process should asymmetrically treat insertions and deletions due to the Bayesian “size principle”; such non-literal interpretation of sentences should (iii) increase with theperceived noise rate of the communicative situation and (iv) decrease if semantically anomalous meanings are more likely to be communicated. These predictions are borne out, strongly suggesting that human language relies on rational statistical inference over a noisy channel. National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant 0844472, from the Linguistics Program) 2014-07-10T20:32:19Z 2014-07-10T20:32:19Z 2013-05 2012-09 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0027-8424 1091-6490 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/88255 Gibson, E., L. Bergen, and S. T. Piantadosi. “Rational Integration of Noisy Evidence and Prior Semantic Expectations in Sentence Interpretation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, no. 20 (May 14, 2013): 8051–8056. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1013-1461 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5912-883X en_US http://dx.doi.org/110.1073/pnas.1216438110 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf National Academy of Sciences (U.S.) PNAS |
| spellingShingle | Gibson, Edward A. Bergen, Leon Piantadosi, Steven T. Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation |
| title | Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation |
| title_full | Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation |
| title_fullStr | Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation |
| title_short | Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation |
| title_sort | rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/88255 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1013-1461 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5912-883X |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gibsonedwarda rationalintegrationofnoisyevidenceandpriorsemanticexpectationsinsentenceinterpretation AT bergenleon rationalintegrationofnoisyevidenceandpriorsemanticexpectationsinsentenceinterpretation AT piantadosistevent rationalintegrationofnoisyevidenceandpriorsemanticexpectationsinsentenceinterpretation |