Using sociometers to quantify social interaction patterns

Research on human social interactions has traditionally relied on self-reports. Despite their widespread use, self-reported accounts of behaviour are prone to biases and necessarily reduce the range of behaviours, and the number of subjects, that may be studied simultaneously. The development of eve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Onnela, Jukka-Pekka, Schnorf, Sebastian, Lazer, David, Waber, Benjamin Nathan, Pentland, Alex Paul
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratory
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/89463
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8053-9983
_version_ 1826216770884599808
author Onnela, Jukka-Pekka
Schnorf, Sebastian
Lazer, David
Waber, Benjamin Nathan
Pentland, Alex Paul
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratory
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratory
Onnela, Jukka-Pekka
Schnorf, Sebastian
Lazer, David
Waber, Benjamin Nathan
Pentland, Alex Paul
author_sort Onnela, Jukka-Pekka
collection MIT
description Research on human social interactions has traditionally relied on self-reports. Despite their widespread use, self-reported accounts of behaviour are prone to biases and necessarily reduce the range of behaviours, and the number of subjects, that may be studied simultaneously. The development of ever smaller sensors makes it possible to study group-level human behaviour in naturalistic settings outside research laboratories. We used such sensors, sociometers, to examine gender, talkativeness and interaction style in two different contexts. Here, we find that in the collaborative context, women were much more likely to be physically proximate to other women and were also significantly more talkative than men, especially in small groups. In contrast, there were no gender-based differences in the non-collaborative setting. Our results highlight the importance of objective measurement in the study of human behaviour, here enabling us to discern context specific, gender-based differences in interaction style.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T16:53:10Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/89463
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T16:53:10Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/894632022-10-03T08:54:13Z Using sociometers to quantify social interaction patterns Onnela, Jukka-Pekka Schnorf, Sebastian Lazer, David Waber, Benjamin Nathan Pentland, Alex Paul Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratory Program in Media Arts and Sciences (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Waber, Benjamin Nathan Pentland, Alex Paul Research on human social interactions has traditionally relied on self-reports. Despite their widespread use, self-reported accounts of behaviour are prone to biases and necessarily reduce the range of behaviours, and the number of subjects, that may be studied simultaneously. The development of ever smaller sensors makes it possible to study group-level human behaviour in naturalistic settings outside research laboratories. We used such sensors, sociometers, to examine gender, talkativeness and interaction style in two different contexts. Here, we find that in the collaborative context, women were much more likely to be physically proximate to other women and were also significantly more talkative than men, especially in small groups. In contrast, there were no gender-based differences in the non-collaborative setting. Our results highlight the importance of objective measurement in the study of human behaviour, here enabling us to discern context specific, gender-based differences in interaction style. 2014-09-12T15:45:43Z 2014-09-12T15:45:43Z 2014-07 2013-05 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 2045-2322 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/89463 Onnela, Jukka-Pekka, Benjamin N. Waber, Alex Pentland, Sebastian Schnorf, and David Lazer. “Using Sociometers to Quantify Social Interaction Patterns.” Sci. Rep. 4 (July 15, 2014). https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8053-9983 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep05604 Scientific Reports Creative Commons Attribution http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ application/pdf Nature Publishing Group Nature Publishing Group
spellingShingle Onnela, Jukka-Pekka
Schnorf, Sebastian
Lazer, David
Waber, Benjamin Nathan
Pentland, Alex Paul
Using sociometers to quantify social interaction patterns
title Using sociometers to quantify social interaction patterns
title_full Using sociometers to quantify social interaction patterns
title_fullStr Using sociometers to quantify social interaction patterns
title_full_unstemmed Using sociometers to quantify social interaction patterns
title_short Using sociometers to quantify social interaction patterns
title_sort using sociometers to quantify social interaction patterns
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/89463
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8053-9983
work_keys_str_mv AT onnelajukkapekka usingsociometerstoquantifysocialinteractionpatterns
AT schnorfsebastian usingsociometerstoquantifysocialinteractionpatterns
AT lazerdavid usingsociometerstoquantifysocialinteractionpatterns
AT waberbenjaminnathan usingsociometerstoquantifysocialinteractionpatterns
AT pentlandalexpaul usingsociometerstoquantifysocialinteractionpatterns