Evaluation wastewater treatment technologies at Ford Powertrain

Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Chemical Engineering; and, (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2000.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gaslightwala Abizer F. (Abizer Firoze), 1973-
Other Authors: Arnold I. Barnett and Charles L. Cooney.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/9001
_version_ 1826214200028954624
author Gaslightwala Abizer F. (Abizer Firoze), 1973-
author2 Arnold I. Barnett and Charles L. Cooney.
author_facet Arnold I. Barnett and Charles L. Cooney.
Gaslightwala Abizer F. (Abizer Firoze), 1973-
author_sort Gaslightwala Abizer F. (Abizer Firoze), 1973-
collection MIT
description Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Chemical Engineering; and, (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2000.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T16:01:41Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/9001
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T16:01:41Z
publishDate 2005
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/90012019-04-12T13:44:20Z Evaluation wastewater treatment technologies at Ford Powertrain Gaslightwala Abizer F. (Abizer Firoze), 1973- Arnold I. Barnett and Charles L. Cooney. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Chemical Engineering. Sloan School of Management. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Chemical Engineering. Sloan School of Management. Chemical Engineering. Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Chemical Engineering; and, (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2000. Includes bibliographical references (p. 80). In preparation for an upcoming EPA proposal regarding Free Oil & Grease (FOG) and metal ion content in wastewater effluent, a study was performed for Ford Motor Company that assesses various seconctary wastewater treatment technologies. The three water purification technologies, membrane filtration, biological treatment, and clay media adsorption, were evaluated as secondary water treatment solutions for oily wastewater. Three different types of membrane technologies were tested: polymeric, ceramic, and sintered stainless steel. In regards to FOG, the membrane technologies and the clay media were able to reduce FOG levels below the EPA proposal of 17 mg/L. However, the clay media did not show a strong affinity for metal ions. The membrane technologies were 'lble to reduce all iron levels below the recommended limits (1.3 mg/L). However, they were not able to reduce aluminum below the proposed limit (I mg/L). This implies that additional downstream processing would be required to remove the aluminum if the membrane solution was implemented and the regulation passes as proposed. The biological wastewater treatment was not tested during these trials, but was assumed to be able to meet all FOG and metal requirements proposed by the EPA. Based on these experimental results and basic design assumptions, an economic analysis over a ten-year period indicated that the biological waste treatment system was the lowest in costs, followed by the polymeric membranes. The estimated installed and operating costs for both technologies was $800,000 and $1,200,000 respectively. The nearest alternative solution, the stainless steel membranes, was over 200% more expensive than the lowest cost option. Based on this economic analysis, Ford should pursue additional research and experiments into the feasibility of using biological wastewater treatment to meet EPA proposed regulations. More specifically, experiments should be conducted to help verify the assumptions used and economic results obtained in this study. As a secondary option, in the absence of additional data, polymeric membranes are recommended as the best solution, despite additional processing needed to remove aluminum ions from water effluent. In addition, the biological waste treatment option has the potential to reduce chemical oxygen demand (COD) measurements below the levels seen by any of the membrane technologies. None of the membrane technologies investigated were capable of reducing COD levels below 200 mg/L on a consistent basis, thus indicating that this might be a fixed barrier for these technologies. Although not relevant today, COD measurements might have significant importance in future EPA water regulations, and should be taken into account when recommending a treatment solution. by Abizer F. Gaslightwala. S.M. 2005-09-27T19:49:40Z 2005-09-27T19:49:40Z 2000 2000 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/9001 47359685 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 99 p. 6546302 bytes 6546061 bytes application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Sloan School of Management.
Chemical Engineering.
Gaslightwala Abizer F. (Abizer Firoze), 1973-
Evaluation wastewater treatment technologies at Ford Powertrain
title Evaluation wastewater treatment technologies at Ford Powertrain
title_full Evaluation wastewater treatment technologies at Ford Powertrain
title_fullStr Evaluation wastewater treatment technologies at Ford Powertrain
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation wastewater treatment technologies at Ford Powertrain
title_short Evaluation wastewater treatment technologies at Ford Powertrain
title_sort evaluation wastewater treatment technologies at ford powertrain
topic Sloan School of Management.
Chemical Engineering.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/9001
work_keys_str_mv AT gaslightwalaabizerfabizerfiroze1973 evaluationwastewatertreatmenttechnologiesatfordpowertrain