Converted Phase Elastic Migration Velocity Analysis

Multi-component elastic seismic data collected at large offsets have the potential to be used in seismic imaging and velocity analysis. In this study, we present an approach for converted-phase elastic-transmission migration velocity analysis with an application for VSP and micro-seismic studies. Ou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shabelansky, Andrey Hanan, Malcolm, Alison E., Fehler, Michael, Shang, Xuefeng, Rodi, William L.
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratory
Format: Technical Report
Language:en_US
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratory 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90525
_version_ 1826203729607524352
author Shabelansky, Andrey Hanan
Malcolm, Alison E.
Fehler, Michael
Shang, Xuefeng
Rodi, William L.
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratory
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratory
Shabelansky, Andrey Hanan
Malcolm, Alison E.
Fehler, Michael
Shang, Xuefeng
Rodi, William L.
author_sort Shabelansky, Andrey Hanan
collection MIT
description Multi-component elastic seismic data collected at large offsets have the potential to be used in seismic imaging and velocity analysis. In this study, we present an approach for converted-phase elastic-transmission migration velocity analysis with an application for VSP and micro-seismic studies. Our approach is based on the cross-correlation between converted-phase P- and S-waves propagated backward in time, and is formulated as an inverse problem with a differential semblance criterium objective function for the simultaneous update of both P- and S-wave velocity models. The merit of this approach is that it is fully data-driven and requires only one elastic backward propagation to form an image rather than the two (one forward and one backward) acoustic propagations needed for standard RTM. Moreover, as the method does not require forward propagation, it does not suffer from migration operator source aliasing when a small number of shots are used. We present a derivation of the method and test it with the synthetic Marmousi model. We also show the differences between the standard reflection offset domain common image gathers and the converted-phase image gathers that we use for model updates.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T12:42:08Z
format Technical Report
id mit-1721.1/90525
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T12:42:08Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratory
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/905252019-04-10T18:31:58Z Converted Phase Elastic Migration Velocity Analysis Shabelansky, Andrey Hanan Malcolm, Alison E. Fehler, Michael Shang, Xuefeng Rodi, William L. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratory migration velocity analysis Migration Microseismic VSP Multi-component elastic seismic data collected at large offsets have the potential to be used in seismic imaging and velocity analysis. In this study, we present an approach for converted-phase elastic-transmission migration velocity analysis with an application for VSP and micro-seismic studies. Our approach is based on the cross-correlation between converted-phase P- and S-waves propagated backward in time, and is formulated as an inverse problem with a differential semblance criterium objective function for the simultaneous update of both P- and S-wave velocity models. The merit of this approach is that it is fully data-driven and requires only one elastic backward propagation to form an image rather than the two (one forward and one backward) acoustic propagations needed for standard RTM. Moreover, as the method does not require forward propagation, it does not suffer from migration operator source aliasing when a small number of shots are used. We present a derivation of the method and test it with the synthetic Marmousi model. We also show the differences between the standard reflection offset domain common image gathers and the converted-phase image gathers that we use for model updates. ConocoPhillips (Firm); Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratory (Founding Members Consortium) 2014-10-02T14:21:34Z 2014-10-02T14:21:34Z 2013 Technical Report http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90525 en_US Earth Resources Laboratory Industry Consortia Annual Report;2013-18 application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratory
spellingShingle migration velocity analysis
Migration
Microseismic
VSP
Shabelansky, Andrey Hanan
Malcolm, Alison E.
Fehler, Michael
Shang, Xuefeng
Rodi, William L.
Converted Phase Elastic Migration Velocity Analysis
title Converted Phase Elastic Migration Velocity Analysis
title_full Converted Phase Elastic Migration Velocity Analysis
title_fullStr Converted Phase Elastic Migration Velocity Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Converted Phase Elastic Migration Velocity Analysis
title_short Converted Phase Elastic Migration Velocity Analysis
title_sort converted phase elastic migration velocity analysis
topic migration velocity analysis
Migration
Microseismic
VSP
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90525
work_keys_str_mv AT shabelanskyandreyhanan convertedphaseelasticmigrationvelocityanalysis
AT malcolmalisone convertedphaseelasticmigrationvelocityanalysis
AT fehlermichael convertedphaseelasticmigrationvelocityanalysis
AT shangxuefeng convertedphaseelasticmigrationvelocityanalysis
AT rodiwilliaml convertedphaseelasticmigrationvelocityanalysis