The Addict in Us all

In this paper, we contend that the psychology of addiction is similar to the psychology of ordinary, non-addictive temptation in important respects, and explore the ways in which these parallels can illuminate both addiction and ordinary action. The incentive salience account of addiction proposed b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Holton, Richard, Dill, Brendan Eddings
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Frontiers Research Foundation 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/92500
_version_ 1826208874576740352
author Holton, Richard
Dill, Brendan Eddings
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Holton, Richard
Dill, Brendan Eddings
author_sort Holton, Richard
collection MIT
description In this paper, we contend that the psychology of addiction is similar to the psychology of ordinary, non-addictive temptation in important respects, and explore the ways in which these parallels can illuminate both addiction and ordinary action. The incentive salience account of addiction proposed by Robinson and Berridge (1–3) entails that addictive desires are not in their nature different from many of the desires had by non-addicts; what is different is rather the way that addictive desires are acquired, which in turn affects their strength. We examine these “incentive salience” desires, both in addicts and non-addicts, contrasting them with more cognitive desires. On this account, the self-control challenge faced by addicted agents is not different in kind from that faced by non-addicted agents – though the two may, of course, differ greatly in degree of difficulty. We explore a general model of self-control for both the addict and the non-addict, stressing that self-control may be employed at three different stages, and examining the ways in which it might be strengthened. This helps elucidate a general model of intentional action.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T14:13:41Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/92500
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T14:13:41Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/925002022-09-28T19:20:18Z The Addict in Us all Holton, Richard Dill, Brendan Eddings Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy Dill, Brendan Eddings In this paper, we contend that the psychology of addiction is similar to the psychology of ordinary, non-addictive temptation in important respects, and explore the ways in which these parallels can illuminate both addiction and ordinary action. The incentive salience account of addiction proposed by Robinson and Berridge (1–3) entails that addictive desires are not in their nature different from many of the desires had by non-addicts; what is different is rather the way that addictive desires are acquired, which in turn affects their strength. We examine these “incentive salience” desires, both in addicts and non-addicts, contrasting them with more cognitive desires. On this account, the self-control challenge faced by addicted agents is not different in kind from that faced by non-addicted agents – though the two may, of course, differ greatly in degree of difficulty. We explore a general model of self-control for both the addict and the non-addict, stressing that self-control may be employed at three different stages, and examining the ways in which it might be strengthened. This helps elucidate a general model of intentional action. 2014-12-24T16:32:17Z 2014-12-24T16:32:17Z 2014-10 2014-05 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1664-0640 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/92500 Dill, Brendan, and Richard Holton. “The Addict in Us All.” Frontiers in Psychiatry 5 (October 9, 2014). en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00139 Frontiers in Psychiatry Creative Commons Attribution http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ application/pdf Frontiers Research Foundation Frontiers Research Foundation
spellingShingle Holton, Richard
Dill, Brendan Eddings
The Addict in Us all
title The Addict in Us all
title_full The Addict in Us all
title_fullStr The Addict in Us all
title_full_unstemmed The Addict in Us all
title_short The Addict in Us all
title_sort addict in us all
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/92500
work_keys_str_mv AT holtonrichard theaddictinusall
AT dillbrendaneddings theaddictinusall
AT holtonrichard addictinusall
AT dillbrendaneddings addictinusall