A Comparison of Atmospheric Reanalysis Products for the Arctic Ocean and Implications for Uncertainties in Air–Sea Fluxes

The uncertainties related to atmospheric fields in the Arctic Ocean from commonly used and recently available reanalysis products are investigated. Fields from the 1) ECMWF Interim Re-Analysis (ERA-Interim), 2) Common Ocean–Ice Reference Experiment version 2 (CORE2), 3) Japanese 25-yr Reanalysis Pro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chaudhuri, Ayan H., Ponte, Rui M., Nguyen, An T.
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: American Meteorological Society 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/93872
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4219-8460
_version_ 1811093982057332736
author Chaudhuri, Ayan H.
Ponte, Rui M.
Nguyen, An T.
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
Chaudhuri, Ayan H.
Ponte, Rui M.
Nguyen, An T.
author_sort Chaudhuri, Ayan H.
collection MIT
description The uncertainties related to atmospheric fields in the Arctic Ocean from commonly used and recently available reanalysis products are investigated. Fields from the 1) ECMWF Interim Re-Analysis (ERA-Interim), 2) Common Ocean–Ice Reference Experiment version 2 (CORE2), 3) Japanese 25-yr Reanalysis Project (JRA-25), 4) NCEP–NCAR reanalysis, 5) NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR), and 6) Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) are evaluated against satellite-derived and in situ observations for zonal and meridional winds, precipitation, specific humidity, surface air temperature, and downwelling longwave and shortwave radiation fluxes. Comparison to reference observations shows that for variables such as air temperature and humidity, all reanalysis products have similar solutions. However, other variables such as winds, precipitation, and radiation show large spreads. The magnitude of uncertainties in all fields is large when compared to the signal. Biases in Arctic cloud parameterizations and predicted temperature and humidity profiles in reanalyses as discussed in other studies are likely common sources of error that affect surface downwelling radiation, air temperature, humidity, and precipitation.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T15:53:24Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/93872
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T15:53:24Z
publishDate 2015
publisher American Meteorological Society
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/938722022-09-29T16:50:33Z A Comparison of Atmospheric Reanalysis Products for the Arctic Ocean and Implications for Uncertainties in Air–Sea Fluxes Chaudhuri, Ayan H. Ponte, Rui M. Nguyen, An T. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Nguyen, An T. Ponte, Rui M. The uncertainties related to atmospheric fields in the Arctic Ocean from commonly used and recently available reanalysis products are investigated. Fields from the 1) ECMWF Interim Re-Analysis (ERA-Interim), 2) Common Ocean–Ice Reference Experiment version 2 (CORE2), 3) Japanese 25-yr Reanalysis Project (JRA-25), 4) NCEP–NCAR reanalysis, 5) NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR), and 6) Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) are evaluated against satellite-derived and in situ observations for zonal and meridional winds, precipitation, specific humidity, surface air temperature, and downwelling longwave and shortwave radiation fluxes. Comparison to reference observations shows that for variables such as air temperature and humidity, all reanalysis products have similar solutions. However, other variables such as winds, precipitation, and radiation show large spreads. The magnitude of uncertainties in all fields is large when compared to the signal. Biases in Arctic cloud parameterizations and predicted temperature and humidity profiles in reanalyses as discussed in other studies are likely common sources of error that affect surface downwelling radiation, air temperature, humidity, and precipitation. National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant ARC-1022733) 2015-02-05T19:08:36Z 2015-02-05T19:08:36Z 2014-07 2014-03 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0894-8755 1520-0442 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/93872 Chaudhuri, Ayan H., Rui M. Ponte, and An T. Nguyen. “A Comparison of Atmospheric Reanalysis Products for the Arctic Ocean and Implications for Uncertainties in Air–Sea Fluxes.” J. Climate 27, no. 14 (July 2014): 5411–5421. © 2014 American Meteorological Society https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4219-8460 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00424.1 Journal of Climate Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf American Meteorological Society American Meteorological Society
spellingShingle Chaudhuri, Ayan H.
Ponte, Rui M.
Nguyen, An T.
A Comparison of Atmospheric Reanalysis Products for the Arctic Ocean and Implications for Uncertainties in Air–Sea Fluxes
title A Comparison of Atmospheric Reanalysis Products for the Arctic Ocean and Implications for Uncertainties in Air–Sea Fluxes
title_full A Comparison of Atmospheric Reanalysis Products for the Arctic Ocean and Implications for Uncertainties in Air–Sea Fluxes
title_fullStr A Comparison of Atmospheric Reanalysis Products for the Arctic Ocean and Implications for Uncertainties in Air–Sea Fluxes
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Atmospheric Reanalysis Products for the Arctic Ocean and Implications for Uncertainties in Air–Sea Fluxes
title_short A Comparison of Atmospheric Reanalysis Products for the Arctic Ocean and Implications for Uncertainties in Air–Sea Fluxes
title_sort comparison of atmospheric reanalysis products for the arctic ocean and implications for uncertainties in air sea fluxes
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/93872
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4219-8460
work_keys_str_mv AT chaudhuriayanh acomparisonofatmosphericreanalysisproductsforthearcticoceanandimplicationsforuncertaintiesinairseafluxes
AT ponteruim acomparisonofatmosphericreanalysisproductsforthearcticoceanandimplicationsforuncertaintiesinairseafluxes
AT nguyenant acomparisonofatmosphericreanalysisproductsforthearcticoceanandimplicationsforuncertaintiesinairseafluxes
AT chaudhuriayanh comparisonofatmosphericreanalysisproductsforthearcticoceanandimplicationsforuncertaintiesinairseafluxes
AT ponteruim comparisonofatmosphericreanalysisproductsforthearcticoceanandimplicationsforuncertaintiesinairseafluxes
AT nguyenant comparisonofatmosphericreanalysisproductsforthearcticoceanandimplicationsforuncertaintiesinairseafluxes