Language: UG or Not to Be, That Is the Question
Lieberman’s commentary [1] nicely illustrates our original argument [2] that analysis of language evolution is complicated by a lack of agreement about the concepts of both “language” and “evolution.” Here we address each in turn. First, Lieberman argues against the existence of a language faculty i...
Main Authors: | Bolhuis, Johan J., Tattersall, Ian, Berwick, Robert C., Chomsky, Avram Noam |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences |
Format: | Article |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96471 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1061-1871 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3632-2461 |
Similar Items
-
How Could Language Have Evolved?
by: Bolhuis, Johan J., et al.
Published: (2014) -
Lenguaje: GU o no ser, esa es la cuestión
by: Bolhuis, Johan J, et al.
Published: (2022) -
The mystery of language evolution
by: Hauser, Marc D., et al.
Published: (2014) -
The language capacity: architecture and evolution
by: Chomsky, Noam, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Neanderthal language? Just-so stories take center stage
by: Berwick, Robert C., et al.
Published: (2013)