Why Everything That Can Go Wrong Often Does: An Analysis of Election Administration Problems

Before the 2000 presidential election, few citizens in the United States paid much attention to election administration. But scholars have noted that election administration has been a problem for decades. Despite the attention paid to election administration in the research literature, most public...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hall, Thad E., Alvarez, R. Michael
Format: Working Paper
Language:en_US
Published: Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96547
_version_ 1811085955468099584
author Hall, Thad E.
Alvarez, R. Michael
author_facet Hall, Thad E.
Alvarez, R. Michael
author_sort Hall, Thad E.
collection MIT
description Before the 2000 presidential election, few citizens in the United States paid much attention to election administration. But scholars have noted that election administration has been a problem for decades. Despite the attention paid to election administration in the research literature, most public policy efforts in since 2000 have been focused on purchasing new voting equipment and fixing problematic procedures, and not on resolving some of the underlying problems in the process of conducting elections in America. Our paper applies the logic of principal-agent theory to the problem of election administration, and analyzes problems in the conduct of elections from this perspective. We examine various components of the dominant method of voting in the United States—poll site voting—and use our principal-agent perspective to demonstrate that serious problems in the polling place environment could be resolved by other means of serving voters, especially vote-by-mail, early voting, and Internet voting.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T13:18:27Z
format Working Paper
id mit-1721.1/96547
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T13:18:27Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/965472019-04-11T13:21:59Z Why Everything That Can Go Wrong Often Does: An Analysis of Election Administration Problems Hall, Thad E. Alvarez, R. Michael Election administration Principal-agent theory Vote-by-mail Early voting Internet voting Before the 2000 presidential election, few citizens in the United States paid much attention to election administration. But scholars have noted that election administration has been a problem for decades. Despite the attention paid to election administration in the research literature, most public policy efforts in since 2000 have been focused on purchasing new voting equipment and fixing problematic procedures, and not on resolving some of the underlying problems in the process of conducting elections in America. Our paper applies the logic of principal-agent theory to the problem of election administration, and analyzes problems in the conduct of elections from this perspective. We examine various components of the dominant method of voting in the United States—poll site voting—and use our principal-agent perspective to demonstrate that serious problems in the polling place environment could be resolved by other means of serving voters, especially vote-by-mail, early voting, and Internet voting. 2015-04-14T16:59:25Z 2015-04-14T16:59:25Z 2003-11-26 Working Paper http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96547 en_US VTP Working Paper Series;10 application/pdf Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project
spellingShingle Election administration
Principal-agent theory
Vote-by-mail
Early voting
Internet voting
Hall, Thad E.
Alvarez, R. Michael
Why Everything That Can Go Wrong Often Does: An Analysis of Election Administration Problems
title Why Everything That Can Go Wrong Often Does: An Analysis of Election Administration Problems
title_full Why Everything That Can Go Wrong Often Does: An Analysis of Election Administration Problems
title_fullStr Why Everything That Can Go Wrong Often Does: An Analysis of Election Administration Problems
title_full_unstemmed Why Everything That Can Go Wrong Often Does: An Analysis of Election Administration Problems
title_short Why Everything That Can Go Wrong Often Does: An Analysis of Election Administration Problems
title_sort why everything that can go wrong often does an analysis of election administration problems
topic Election administration
Principal-agent theory
Vote-by-mail
Early voting
Internet voting
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96547
work_keys_str_mv AT hallthade whyeverythingthatcangowrongoftendoesananalysisofelectionadministrationproblems
AT alvarezrmichael whyeverythingthatcangowrongoftendoesananalysisofelectionadministrationproblems