Making Voting Easier: Convenience Voting in the 2008 Presidential Election

In this study we analyze the choice of voting mode in the 2008 presidential election. We use a large-sample survey with national coverage that allows us to overcome limitations of previous studies. Our analysis provides a number of insights into some of the important debates about convenience voting...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alvarez, R. Michael, Levin, Ines, Sinclair, J. Andrew
Format: Working Paper
Language:en_US
Published: Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96626
_version_ 1826209324328812544
author Alvarez, R. Michael
Levin, Ines
Sinclair, J. Andrew
author_facet Alvarez, R. Michael
Levin, Ines
Sinclair, J. Andrew
author_sort Alvarez, R. Michael
collection MIT
description In this study we analyze the choice of voting mode in the 2008 presidential election. We use a large-sample survey with national coverage that allows us to overcome limitations of previous studies. Our analysis provides a number of insights into some of the important debates about convenience voting. Among other things, we find little support for the hypothesis that convenience voting methods have partisan implications; although we do find voter attributes that lead to the choice of some particular convenience voting mode. Results like these have important implications for future moves towards convenience voting and the design of new outreach campaigns.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T14:20:44Z
format Working Paper
id mit-1721.1/96626
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T14:20:44Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/966262019-04-10T15:11:26Z Making Voting Easier: Convenience Voting in the 2008 Presidential Election Alvarez, R. Michael Levin, Ines Sinclair, J. Andrew In this study we analyze the choice of voting mode in the 2008 presidential election. We use a large-sample survey with national coverage that allows us to overcome limitations of previous studies. Our analysis provides a number of insights into some of the important debates about convenience voting. Among other things, we find little support for the hypothesis that convenience voting methods have partisan implications; although we do find voter attributes that lead to the choice of some particular convenience voting mode. Results like these have important implications for future moves towards convenience voting and the design of new outreach campaigns. Pew Charitable Trusts 2015-04-16T12:11:48Z 2015-04-16T12:11:48Z 2010-03-15 Working Paper http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96626 en_US VTP Working Paper Series;95 application/pdf Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project
spellingShingle Alvarez, R. Michael
Levin, Ines
Sinclair, J. Andrew
Making Voting Easier: Convenience Voting in the 2008 Presidential Election
title Making Voting Easier: Convenience Voting in the 2008 Presidential Election
title_full Making Voting Easier: Convenience Voting in the 2008 Presidential Election
title_fullStr Making Voting Easier: Convenience Voting in the 2008 Presidential Election
title_full_unstemmed Making Voting Easier: Convenience Voting in the 2008 Presidential Election
title_short Making Voting Easier: Convenience Voting in the 2008 Presidential Election
title_sort making voting easier convenience voting in the 2008 presidential election
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96626
work_keys_str_mv AT alvarezrmichael makingvotingeasierconveniencevotinginthe2008presidentialelection
AT levinines makingvotingeasierconveniencevotinginthe2008presidentialelection
AT sinclairjandrew makingvotingeasierconveniencevotinginthe2008presidentialelection