Scantegrity Responds to Rice Study on Usability of the Scantegrity II Voting System

This note is a response to, and critique of, recent work by Acemyan, Kortum, Bryne, and Wallach regarding the usability of end-to-end verifiable voting systems, and in particular, to their analysis of the usability of the Scantegrity II voting system. Their work is given in a JETS paper [Ace14] and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: McBurnett, Neal, Carback, Richard T., Chaum, David, Clark, Jeremy, Conway, John, Essex, Aleksander, Herrnson, Paul S., Mayberry, Travis, Popoveniuc, Stefan, Rivest, Ronald L., Shen, Emily, Sherman, Alan T., Vora, Poorvi L.
Format: Working Paper
Language:en_US
Published: Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96648
_version_ 1826198697121153024
author McBurnett, Neal
Carback, Richard T.
Chaum, David
Clark, Jeremy
Conway, John
Essex, Aleksander
Herrnson, Paul S.
Mayberry, Travis
Popoveniuc, Stefan
Rivest, Ronald L.
Shen, Emily
Sherman, Alan T.
Vora, Poorvi L.
author_facet McBurnett, Neal
Carback, Richard T.
Chaum, David
Clark, Jeremy
Conway, John
Essex, Aleksander
Herrnson, Paul S.
Mayberry, Travis
Popoveniuc, Stefan
Rivest, Ronald L.
Shen, Emily
Sherman, Alan T.
Vora, Poorvi L.
author_sort McBurnett, Neal
collection MIT
description This note is a response to, and critique of, recent work by Acemyan, Kortum, Bryne, and Wallach regarding the usability of end-to-end verifiable voting systems, and in particular, to their analysis of the usability of the Scantegrity II voting system. Their work is given in a JETS paper [Ace14] and was presented at EVT/WOTE 2014; it was also described in an associated press release [Rut14]. We find that their study lacked an appropriate control voting system with which to compare effectiveness, and thus their conclusions regarding Scantegrity II are unsupported by the evidence they present. Furthermore, their conclusions are contradicted by the successful deployment experiences of Scantegrity II at Takoma Park.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T11:08:43Z
format Working Paper
id mit-1721.1/96648
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T11:08:43Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/966482019-04-11T06:49:50Z Scantegrity Responds to Rice Study on Usability of the Scantegrity II Voting System McBurnett, Neal Carback, Richard T. Chaum, David Clark, Jeremy Conway, John Essex, Aleksander Herrnson, Paul S. Mayberry, Travis Popoveniuc, Stefan Rivest, Ronald L. Shen, Emily Sherman, Alan T. Vora, Poorvi L. This note is a response to, and critique of, recent work by Acemyan, Kortum, Bryne, and Wallach regarding the usability of end-to-end verifiable voting systems, and in particular, to their analysis of the usability of the Scantegrity II voting system. Their work is given in a JETS paper [Ace14] and was presented at EVT/WOTE 2014; it was also described in an associated press release [Rut14]. We find that their study lacked an appropriate control voting system with which to compare effectiveness, and thus their conclusions regarding Scantegrity II are unsupported by the evidence they present. Furthermore, their conclusions are contradicted by the successful deployment experiences of Scantegrity II at Takoma Park. 2015-04-16T15:13:10Z 2015-04-16T15:13:10Z 2014-12-28 Working Paper http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96648 en_US VTP Working Paper Series;126 application/pdf Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project
spellingShingle McBurnett, Neal
Carback, Richard T.
Chaum, David
Clark, Jeremy
Conway, John
Essex, Aleksander
Herrnson, Paul S.
Mayberry, Travis
Popoveniuc, Stefan
Rivest, Ronald L.
Shen, Emily
Sherman, Alan T.
Vora, Poorvi L.
Scantegrity Responds to Rice Study on Usability of the Scantegrity II Voting System
title Scantegrity Responds to Rice Study on Usability of the Scantegrity II Voting System
title_full Scantegrity Responds to Rice Study on Usability of the Scantegrity II Voting System
title_fullStr Scantegrity Responds to Rice Study on Usability of the Scantegrity II Voting System
title_full_unstemmed Scantegrity Responds to Rice Study on Usability of the Scantegrity II Voting System
title_short Scantegrity Responds to Rice Study on Usability of the Scantegrity II Voting System
title_sort scantegrity responds to rice study on usability of the scantegrity ii voting system
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96648
work_keys_str_mv AT mcburnettneal scantegrityrespondstoricestudyonusabilityofthescantegrityiivotingsystem
AT carbackrichardt scantegrityrespondstoricestudyonusabilityofthescantegrityiivotingsystem
AT chaumdavid scantegrityrespondstoricestudyonusabilityofthescantegrityiivotingsystem
AT clarkjeremy scantegrityrespondstoricestudyonusabilityofthescantegrityiivotingsystem
AT conwayjohn scantegrityrespondstoricestudyonusabilityofthescantegrityiivotingsystem
AT essexaleksander scantegrityrespondstoricestudyonusabilityofthescantegrityiivotingsystem
AT herrnsonpauls scantegrityrespondstoricestudyonusabilityofthescantegrityiivotingsystem
AT mayberrytravis scantegrityrespondstoricestudyonusabilityofthescantegrityiivotingsystem
AT popoveniucstefan scantegrityrespondstoricestudyonusabilityofthescantegrityiivotingsystem
AT rivestronaldl scantegrityrespondstoricestudyonusabilityofthescantegrityiivotingsystem
AT shenemily scantegrityrespondstoricestudyonusabilityofthescantegrityiivotingsystem
AT shermanalant scantegrityrespondstoricestudyonusabilityofthescantegrityiivotingsystem
AT vorapoorvil scantegrityrespondstoricestudyonusabilityofthescantegrityiivotingsystem