Technology Portfolio Planning by Weighted Graph Analysis of System Architectures

Many systems undergo significant architecture-level change throughout their lifecycles in order to adapt to new operating and funding contexts, to react to failed technology development, or to incorporate new technologies. In all cases early architecture selection and technology investment decisions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Davison, Peter, Crawley, Edward F., Cameron, Bruce Gregory
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Wiley Blackwell 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96926
_version_ 1826193564065857536
author Davison, Peter
Crawley, Edward F.
Cameron, Bruce Gregory
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Davison, Peter
Crawley, Edward F.
Cameron, Bruce Gregory
author_sort Davison, Peter
collection MIT
description Many systems undergo significant architecture-level change throughout their lifecycles in order to adapt to new operating and funding contexts, to react to failed technology development, or to incorporate new technologies. In all cases early architecture selection and technology investment decisions will constrain the system to certain regions of the tradespace, which can limit the evolvability of the system and its robustness to exogenous changes. In this paper we present a method for charting development pathways within a tradespace of potential architectures, with a view to enabling robustness to technology portfolio realization and later architectural changes. The tradespace is first transformed into a weighted, directed graph of architecture nodes with connectivity determined by relationships between technology portfolios and functional architecture. The tradespace exploration problem is then restated as a shortest path problem through this graph. This method is applied to the tradespace of in-space transportation architectures for missions to Mars, finding that knowledge of pathways through the tradespace can identify negative coupling between functional architectures and particular technologies, as well as identify ways to prioritize future technology investments.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T09:41:06Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/96926
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T09:41:06Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Wiley Blackwell
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/969262022-09-26T13:05:04Z Technology Portfolio Planning by Weighted Graph Analysis of System Architectures Davison, Peter Crawley, Edward F. Cameron, Bruce Gregory Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division Davison, Peter Cameron, Bruce Gregory Many systems undergo significant architecture-level change throughout their lifecycles in order to adapt to new operating and funding contexts, to react to failed technology development, or to incorporate new technologies. In all cases early architecture selection and technology investment decisions will constrain the system to certain regions of the tradespace, which can limit the evolvability of the system and its robustness to exogenous changes. In this paper we present a method for charting development pathways within a tradespace of potential architectures, with a view to enabling robustness to technology portfolio realization and later architectural changes. The tradespace is first transformed into a weighted, directed graph of architecture nodes with connectivity determined by relationships between technology portfolios and functional architecture. The tradespace exploration problem is then restated as a shortest path problem through this graph. This method is applied to the tradespace of in-space transportation architectures for missions to Mars, finding that knowledge of pathways through the tradespace can identify negative coupling between functional architectures and particular technologies, as well as identify ways to prioritize future technology investments. Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology 2015-05-07T14:09:34Z 2015-05-07T14:09:34Z 2014-09 2014-06 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 10981241 1520-6858 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96926 Davison, Peter, Bruce Cameron, and Edward F. Crawley. “Technology Portfolio Planning by Weighted Graph Analysis of System Architectures.” Systems Engineering 18, no. 1 (September 8, 2014): 45–58. en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sys.21287 Systems Engineering Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf Wiley Blackwell MIT web domain
spellingShingle Davison, Peter
Crawley, Edward F.
Cameron, Bruce Gregory
Technology Portfolio Planning by Weighted Graph Analysis of System Architectures
title Technology Portfolio Planning by Weighted Graph Analysis of System Architectures
title_full Technology Portfolio Planning by Weighted Graph Analysis of System Architectures
title_fullStr Technology Portfolio Planning by Weighted Graph Analysis of System Architectures
title_full_unstemmed Technology Portfolio Planning by Weighted Graph Analysis of System Architectures
title_short Technology Portfolio Planning by Weighted Graph Analysis of System Architectures
title_sort technology portfolio planning by weighted graph analysis of system architectures
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96926
work_keys_str_mv AT davisonpeter technologyportfolioplanningbyweightedgraphanalysisofsystemarchitectures
AT crawleyedwardf technologyportfolioplanningbyweightedgraphanalysisofsystemarchitectures
AT cameronbrucegregory technologyportfolioplanningbyweightedgraphanalysisofsystemarchitectures