Auditory and tactile gap discrimination by observers with normal and impaired hearing

Temporal processing ability for the senses of hearing and touch was examined through the measurement of gap-duration discrimination thresholds (GDDTs) employing the same low-frequency sinusoidal stimuli in both modalities. GDDTs were measured in three groups of observers (normal-hearing, hearing-imp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Desloge, Joseph G., Reed, Charlotte M., Braida, Louis D., Delhorne, Lorraine A., Villabona, Timothy J., Perez, Zach
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Acoustical Society of America (ASA) 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/99887
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1680-1913
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8431-4730
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8783-4128
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2538-9991
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2673-3889
_version_ 1826216654411923456
author Desloge, Joseph G.
Reed, Charlotte M.
Braida, Louis D.
Delhorne, Lorraine A.
Villabona, Timothy J.
Perez, Zach
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Desloge, Joseph G.
Reed, Charlotte M.
Braida, Louis D.
Delhorne, Lorraine A.
Villabona, Timothy J.
Perez, Zach
author_sort Desloge, Joseph G.
collection MIT
description Temporal processing ability for the senses of hearing and touch was examined through the measurement of gap-duration discrimination thresholds (GDDTs) employing the same low-frequency sinusoidal stimuli in both modalities. GDDTs were measured in three groups of observers (normal-hearing, hearing-impaired, and normal-hearing with simulated hearing loss) covering an age range of 21–69 yr. GDDTs for a baseline gap of 6 ms were measured for four different combinations of 100-ms leading and trailing markers (250–250, 250–400, 400–250, and 400–400 Hz). Auditory measurements were obtained for monaural presentation over headphones and tactile measurements were obtained using sinusoidal vibrations presented to the left middle finger. The auditory GDDTs of the hearing-impaired listeners, which were larger than those of the normal-hearing observers, were well-reproduced in the listeners with simulated loss. The magnitude of the GDDT was generally independent of modality and showed effects of age in both modalities. The use of different-frequency compared to same-frequency markers led to a greater deterioration in auditory GDDTs compared to tactile GDDTs and may reflect differences in bandwidth properties between the two sensory systems.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T16:50:56Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/99887
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T16:50:56Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/998872022-09-29T21:53:35Z Auditory and tactile gap discrimination by observers with normal and impaired hearing Desloge, Joseph G. Reed, Charlotte M. Braida, Louis D. Delhorne, Lorraine A. Villabona, Timothy J. Perez, Zach Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Laboratory of Electronics Desloge, Joseph G. Reed, Charlotte M. Braida, Louis D. Perez, Zach Delhorne, Lorraine A. Villabona, Timothy J. Temporal processing ability for the senses of hearing and touch was examined through the measurement of gap-duration discrimination thresholds (GDDTs) employing the same low-frequency sinusoidal stimuli in both modalities. GDDTs were measured in three groups of observers (normal-hearing, hearing-impaired, and normal-hearing with simulated hearing loss) covering an age range of 21–69 yr. GDDTs for a baseline gap of 6 ms were measured for four different combinations of 100-ms leading and trailing markers (250–250, 250–400, 400–250, and 400–400 Hz). Auditory measurements were obtained for monaural presentation over headphones and tactile measurements were obtained using sinusoidal vibrations presented to the left middle finger. The auditory GDDTs of the hearing-impaired listeners, which were larger than those of the normal-hearing observers, were well-reproduced in the listeners with simulated loss. The magnitude of the GDDT was generally independent of modality and showed effects of age in both modalities. The use of different-frequency compared to same-frequency markers led to a greater deterioration in auditory GDDTs compared to tactile GDDTs and may reflect differences in bandwidth properties between the two sensory systems. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (U.S.) (Grant R01 DC000117) 2015-11-10T18:00:43Z 2015-11-10T18:00:43Z 2014-02 2013-12 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0001-4966 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/99887 Desloge, Joseph G., Charlotte M. Reed, Louis D. Braida, Zachary D. Perez, Lorraine A. Delhorne, and Timothy J. Villabona. “Auditory and Tactile Gap Discrimination by Observers with Normal and Impaired Hearing.” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 135, no. 2 (February 2014): 838–850. © 2014 Acoustical Society of America https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1680-1913 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8431-4730 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8783-4128 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2538-9991 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2673-3889 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4861246 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf Acoustical Society of America (ASA) Acoustical Society of America
spellingShingle Desloge, Joseph G.
Reed, Charlotte M.
Braida, Louis D.
Delhorne, Lorraine A.
Villabona, Timothy J.
Perez, Zach
Auditory and tactile gap discrimination by observers with normal and impaired hearing
title Auditory and tactile gap discrimination by observers with normal and impaired hearing
title_full Auditory and tactile gap discrimination by observers with normal and impaired hearing
title_fullStr Auditory and tactile gap discrimination by observers with normal and impaired hearing
title_full_unstemmed Auditory and tactile gap discrimination by observers with normal and impaired hearing
title_short Auditory and tactile gap discrimination by observers with normal and impaired hearing
title_sort auditory and tactile gap discrimination by observers with normal and impaired hearing
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/99887
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1680-1913
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8431-4730
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8783-4128
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2538-9991
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2673-3889
work_keys_str_mv AT deslogejosephg auditoryandtactilegapdiscriminationbyobserverswithnormalandimpairedhearing
AT reedcharlottem auditoryandtactilegapdiscriminationbyobserverswithnormalandimpairedhearing
AT braidalouisd auditoryandtactilegapdiscriminationbyobserverswithnormalandimpairedhearing
AT delhornelorrainea auditoryandtactilegapdiscriminationbyobserverswithnormalandimpairedhearing
AT villabonatimothyj auditoryandtactilegapdiscriminationbyobserverswithnormalandimpairedhearing
AT perezzach auditoryandtactilegapdiscriminationbyobserverswithnormalandimpairedhearing