Limits of coercive isolation : rethink strategy on North Korea and Iran
Coercive diplomacy has failed to compel North Korea to give up its nuclear weapons programme and failed to deter Iran advancing its own. Isolating these two target states further will not succeed because isolation increases their incentives to rely on nuclear deterrence for national security.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Commentary |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/104340 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/20161 |
_version_ | 1811693997274431488 |
---|---|
author | Timothy W. Crawford |
author2 | S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies |
author_facet | S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Timothy W. Crawford |
author_sort | Timothy W. Crawford |
collection | NTU |
description | Coercive diplomacy has failed to compel North Korea to give up its nuclear weapons programme and failed to deter Iran advancing its own. Isolating these two target states further will not succeed because isolation increases their incentives to rely on nuclear deterrence for national security. |
first_indexed | 2024-10-01T07:00:34Z |
format | Commentary |
id | ntu-10356/104340 |
institution | Nanyang Technological University |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-10-01T07:00:34Z |
publishDate | 2014 |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | ntu-10356/1043402020-11-01T07:33:19Z Limits of coercive isolation : rethink strategy on North Korea and Iran Timothy W. Crawford S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies DRNTU::Social sciences::Political science Coercive diplomacy has failed to compel North Korea to give up its nuclear weapons programme and failed to deter Iran advancing its own. Isolating these two target states further will not succeed because isolation increases their incentives to rely on nuclear deterrence for national security. 2014-07-11T08:11:25Z 2019-12-06T21:30:46Z 2014-07-11T08:11:25Z 2019-12-06T21:30:46Z 2013 2013 Commentary Timothy W. Crawford. (2013). Limits of coercive isolation : rethink strategy on North Korea and Iran. (RSIS Commentaries, No. 186). RSIS Commentaries. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/104340 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/20161 en RSIS Commentaries, 186-13 Nanyang Technological University 2 p. application/pdf |
spellingShingle | DRNTU::Social sciences::Political science Timothy W. Crawford Limits of coercive isolation : rethink strategy on North Korea and Iran |
title | Limits of coercive isolation : rethink strategy on North Korea and Iran |
title_full | Limits of coercive isolation : rethink strategy on North Korea and Iran |
title_fullStr | Limits of coercive isolation : rethink strategy on North Korea and Iran |
title_full_unstemmed | Limits of coercive isolation : rethink strategy on North Korea and Iran |
title_short | Limits of coercive isolation : rethink strategy on North Korea and Iran |
title_sort | limits of coercive isolation rethink strategy on north korea and iran |
topic | DRNTU::Social sciences::Political science |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/104340 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/20161 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT timothywcrawford limitsofcoerciveisolationrethinkstrategyonnorthkoreaandiran |