Assessment of the competitiveness of ports as bunkering hubs : a case study of Singapore and Shanghai

As bunkering constitutes almost 50% of a ship’s voyage costs, the selection of competitive bunkering ports is an important consideration for ship operators and managers. However current research on the bunkering industry is limited. This paper formulates a method for assessing the competitiveness...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen, Desiree Wanli., Cheng, Fan., Wong, Kevin Hui Shiung.
Other Authors: Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee
Format: Final Year Project (FYP)
Language:English
Published: 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/12797
_version_ 1826118382778318848
author Chen, Desiree Wanli.
Cheng, Fan.
Wong, Kevin Hui Shiung.
author2 Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee
author_facet Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee
Chen, Desiree Wanli.
Cheng, Fan.
Wong, Kevin Hui Shiung.
author_sort Chen, Desiree Wanli.
collection NTU
description As bunkering constitutes almost 50% of a ship’s voyage costs, the selection of competitive bunkering ports is an important consideration for ship operators and managers. However current research on the bunkering industry is limited. This paper formulates a method for assessing the competitiveness of ports as bunkering hubs and includes case studies on the ports of Singapore and Shanghai; Singapore being the largest port in terms of cargo volumes and bunker lifting, while Shanghai is on course to developing into a major shipping hub. The assessment consists of ten attributes identified from industrial interviews. Through surveys, these attributes were ranked by ship operators and managers, in terms of their importance when selecting a bunkering port. The respondents also assessed Singapore and Shanghai based on the ten attributes. Bunker quality, market transparency, bunker price competitiveness, reliability and punctuality of suppliers, and bunkering facilities are identified as the five most important attributes. These attributes are analysed in detail with regards to their determinants and importance to ship operators and managers. Statistical techniques are applied in the analysis of the survey results. The weighted scores for the performance of the ports of Singapore and Shanghai in terms of the various attributes are computed by taking into consideration their importance. Location of port and stability of political environment are identified as the strengths of Port of Singapore, while reliability and punctuality of suppliers, as well as the availability of low sulphur bunkers are the weakest links. For Port of Shanghai, stability of political environment and bunker quality are the best performing attributes, while bunker price competitiveness and availability of low sulphur bunkers are the weakest performing areas. In the case studies, the performance of the ports of Singapore and Shanghai is assessed in terms of the 5 most important attributes in selecting a bunkering port, based on industrial findings and survey results. After totalling the weighted average scores for the ports of Singapore and Shanghai, the paper concludes their relative positions in terms of competitiveness as bunkering ports. General recommendations are given for the benefit of operators and authorities of other ports. Specifically, recommendations are also given for port operators and authorities from the two ports with regards to the weakest areas identified in the survey.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T04:42:48Z
format Final Year Project (FYP)
id ntu-10356/12797
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T04:42:48Z
publishDate 2008
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/127972023-03-03T17:03:19Z Assessment of the competitiveness of ports as bunkering hubs : a case study of Singapore and Shanghai Chen, Desiree Wanli. Cheng, Fan. Wong, Kevin Hui Shiung. Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee School of Civil and Environmental Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Maritime studies::Maritime management and business As bunkering constitutes almost 50% of a ship’s voyage costs, the selection of competitive bunkering ports is an important consideration for ship operators and managers. However current research on the bunkering industry is limited. This paper formulates a method for assessing the competitiveness of ports as bunkering hubs and includes case studies on the ports of Singapore and Shanghai; Singapore being the largest port in terms of cargo volumes and bunker lifting, while Shanghai is on course to developing into a major shipping hub. The assessment consists of ten attributes identified from industrial interviews. Through surveys, these attributes were ranked by ship operators and managers, in terms of their importance when selecting a bunkering port. The respondents also assessed Singapore and Shanghai based on the ten attributes. Bunker quality, market transparency, bunker price competitiveness, reliability and punctuality of suppliers, and bunkering facilities are identified as the five most important attributes. These attributes are analysed in detail with regards to their determinants and importance to ship operators and managers. Statistical techniques are applied in the analysis of the survey results. The weighted scores for the performance of the ports of Singapore and Shanghai in terms of the various attributes are computed by taking into consideration their importance. Location of port and stability of political environment are identified as the strengths of Port of Singapore, while reliability and punctuality of suppliers, as well as the availability of low sulphur bunkers are the weakest links. For Port of Shanghai, stability of political environment and bunker quality are the best performing attributes, while bunker price competitiveness and availability of low sulphur bunkers are the weakest performing areas. In the case studies, the performance of the ports of Singapore and Shanghai is assessed in terms of the 5 most important attributes in selecting a bunkering port, based on industrial findings and survey results. After totalling the weighted average scores for the ports of Singapore and Shanghai, the paper concludes their relative positions in terms of competitiveness as bunkering ports. General recommendations are given for the benefit of operators and authorities of other ports. Specifically, recommendations are also given for port operators and authorities from the two ports with regards to the weakest areas identified in the survey. Bachelor of Science (Maritime Studies) 2008-10-07T01:36:43Z 2008-10-07T01:36:43Z 2008 2008 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/12797 en 44 p. application/pdf
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Maritime studies::Maritime management and business
Chen, Desiree Wanli.
Cheng, Fan.
Wong, Kevin Hui Shiung.
Assessment of the competitiveness of ports as bunkering hubs : a case study of Singapore and Shanghai
title Assessment of the competitiveness of ports as bunkering hubs : a case study of Singapore and Shanghai
title_full Assessment of the competitiveness of ports as bunkering hubs : a case study of Singapore and Shanghai
title_fullStr Assessment of the competitiveness of ports as bunkering hubs : a case study of Singapore and Shanghai
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the competitiveness of ports as bunkering hubs : a case study of Singapore and Shanghai
title_short Assessment of the competitiveness of ports as bunkering hubs : a case study of Singapore and Shanghai
title_sort assessment of the competitiveness of ports as bunkering hubs a case study of singapore and shanghai
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Maritime studies::Maritime management and business
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/12797
work_keys_str_mv AT chendesireewanli assessmentofthecompetitivenessofportsasbunkeringhubsacasestudyofsingaporeandshanghai
AT chengfan assessmentofthecompetitivenessofportsasbunkeringhubsacasestudyofsingaporeandshanghai
AT wongkevinhuishiung assessmentofthecompetitivenessofportsasbunkeringhubsacasestudyofsingaporeandshanghai