A composite rupture model for the great 1950 Assam earthquake across the cusp of the East Himalayan Syntaxis
Although the M=w8.7, 1950 Assam earthquake endures as the largest continental earthquake ever recorded, its exact source and mechanism remain contentious. In this paper, we jointly analyze the spatial distributions of reappraised aftershocks and landslides, and provide new field evidence for its hit...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/136999 |
_version_ | 1826128223544541184 |
---|---|
author | Coudurier-Curveur, A. Tapponnier, P. Okal, E. Van der Woerd, J. Kali, E. Choudhury, S. Baruah, S. Etchebes, M. Karakaş, Ç. |
author2 | Earth Observatory of Singapore |
author_facet | Earth Observatory of Singapore Coudurier-Curveur, A. Tapponnier, P. Okal, E. Van der Woerd, J. Kali, E. Choudhury, S. Baruah, S. Etchebes, M. Karakaş, Ç. |
author_sort | Coudurier-Curveur, A. |
collection | NTU |
description | Although the M=w8.7, 1950 Assam earthquake endures as the largest continental earthquake ever recorded, its exact source and mechanism remain contentious. In this paper, we jointly analyze the spatial distributions of reappraised aftershocks and landslides, and provide new field evidence for its hitherto unknown surface rupture extent along the Mishmi and Abor Hills. Within both mountain fronts, relocated aftershocks and fresh landslide scars spread over an area of ≈330 km by 100 km. The former are more abundant in the Abor Hills while the later mostly affect the front of the Mishmi Hills. We found steep seismic scarps cutting across fluvial deposits and bounding recently uplifted terraces, some of which less than two thousand years or even a couple centuries old, at several sites along both mountain fronts. They likely attest to a minimum 200 km-long 1950 surface rupture on both the Mishmi and Main Himalayan Frontal Thrusts (MT and MFT, respectively), crossing the East Himalayan Syntaxis. At two key sites (Wakro and Pasighat), co-seismic surface throw appears to have been over twice as large on the MT as on the MFT (7.6 ± 0.2 m vs. >2.6 ± 0.1 m), in keeping with the relative, average mountain heights (3200 m vs. 1400 m), mapped landslide scar numbers (182 vs. 96), and average thrust dips (25–28° vs. 13–15°) consistent with relocated aftershocks depths. Corresponding average slip amounts at depth would have been ≈17 and ≈11 m on the MT and MFT, respectively, while surface slip at Wakro might have reached ≈34 m. Note that this amount of superficial slip would be out of reach using classic paleo-seismological trenching to reconstruct paleo-earthquake history. Most of the 1950 first arrivals fit with a composite focal mechanism co-involving the two shallow-dipping thrust planes. Their intersection lies roughly beneath the Dibang Valley, implying forced slip parallel to GPS vectors across the East Himalayan Syntaxis. Successive, near-identical, terrace uplifts at Wakro suggest near-characteristic slip during the last two surface rupturing earthquakes, while terrace boulder ages may be taken to imply bi-millennial return time for 1950-size events. As in Nepal, East-Himalayan mega-quakes are not blind and release most of the elastic, interseismic shortening that accumulates across the range. |
first_indexed | 2024-10-01T07:21:26Z |
format | Journal Article |
id | ntu-10356/136999 |
institution | Nanyang Technological University |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-10-01T07:21:26Z |
publishDate | 2020 |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | ntu-10356/1369992020-09-26T21:35:23Z A composite rupture model for the great 1950 Assam earthquake across the cusp of the East Himalayan Syntaxis Coudurier-Curveur, A. Tapponnier, P. Okal, E. Van der Woerd, J. Kali, E. Choudhury, S. Baruah, S. Etchebes, M. Karakaş, Ç. Earth Observatory of Singapore Science::Geology Assam Himalayan Earthquakes Although the M=w8.7, 1950 Assam earthquake endures as the largest continental earthquake ever recorded, its exact source and mechanism remain contentious. In this paper, we jointly analyze the spatial distributions of reappraised aftershocks and landslides, and provide new field evidence for its hitherto unknown surface rupture extent along the Mishmi and Abor Hills. Within both mountain fronts, relocated aftershocks and fresh landslide scars spread over an area of ≈330 km by 100 km. The former are more abundant in the Abor Hills while the later mostly affect the front of the Mishmi Hills. We found steep seismic scarps cutting across fluvial deposits and bounding recently uplifted terraces, some of which less than two thousand years or even a couple centuries old, at several sites along both mountain fronts. They likely attest to a minimum 200 km-long 1950 surface rupture on both the Mishmi and Main Himalayan Frontal Thrusts (MT and MFT, respectively), crossing the East Himalayan Syntaxis. At two key sites (Wakro and Pasighat), co-seismic surface throw appears to have been over twice as large on the MT as on the MFT (7.6 ± 0.2 m vs. >2.6 ± 0.1 m), in keeping with the relative, average mountain heights (3200 m vs. 1400 m), mapped landslide scar numbers (182 vs. 96), and average thrust dips (25–28° vs. 13–15°) consistent with relocated aftershocks depths. Corresponding average slip amounts at depth would have been ≈17 and ≈11 m on the MT and MFT, respectively, while surface slip at Wakro might have reached ≈34 m. Note that this amount of superficial slip would be out of reach using classic paleo-seismological trenching to reconstruct paleo-earthquake history. Most of the 1950 first arrivals fit with a composite focal mechanism co-involving the two shallow-dipping thrust planes. Their intersection lies roughly beneath the Dibang Valley, implying forced slip parallel to GPS vectors across the East Himalayan Syntaxis. Successive, near-identical, terrace uplifts at Wakro suggest near-characteristic slip during the last two surface rupturing earthquakes, while terrace boulder ages may be taken to imply bi-millennial return time for 1950-size events. As in Nepal, East-Himalayan mega-quakes are not blind and release most of the elastic, interseismic shortening that accumulates across the range. NRF (Natl Research Foundation, S’pore) MOE (Min. of Education, S’pore) Published version 2020-02-11T07:26:45Z 2020-02-11T07:26:45Z 2020 Journal Article Coudurier-Curveur, A., Tapponnier, P., Okal, E., Van der Woerd, J., Kali, E., Choudhury, S., ... Karakaş, Ç. (2020). A composite rupture model for the great 1950 Assam earthquake across the cusp of the East Himalayan Syntaxis. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 531115928-. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115928 0012-821X https://hdl.handle.net/10356/136999 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115928 2-s2.0-85075535315 531 115928 en Earth and Planetary Science Letters © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). application/pdf |
spellingShingle | Science::Geology Assam Himalayan Earthquakes Coudurier-Curveur, A. Tapponnier, P. Okal, E. Van der Woerd, J. Kali, E. Choudhury, S. Baruah, S. Etchebes, M. Karakaş, Ç. A composite rupture model for the great 1950 Assam earthquake across the cusp of the East Himalayan Syntaxis |
title | A composite rupture model for the great 1950 Assam earthquake across the cusp of the East Himalayan Syntaxis |
title_full | A composite rupture model for the great 1950 Assam earthquake across the cusp of the East Himalayan Syntaxis |
title_fullStr | A composite rupture model for the great 1950 Assam earthquake across the cusp of the East Himalayan Syntaxis |
title_full_unstemmed | A composite rupture model for the great 1950 Assam earthquake across the cusp of the East Himalayan Syntaxis |
title_short | A composite rupture model for the great 1950 Assam earthquake across the cusp of the East Himalayan Syntaxis |
title_sort | composite rupture model for the great 1950 assam earthquake across the cusp of the east himalayan syntaxis |
topic | Science::Geology Assam Himalayan Earthquakes |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/136999 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT couduriercurveura acompositerupturemodelforthegreat1950assamearthquakeacrossthecuspoftheeasthimalayansyntaxis AT tapponnierp acompositerupturemodelforthegreat1950assamearthquakeacrossthecuspoftheeasthimalayansyntaxis AT okale acompositerupturemodelforthegreat1950assamearthquakeacrossthecuspoftheeasthimalayansyntaxis AT vanderwoerdj acompositerupturemodelforthegreat1950assamearthquakeacrossthecuspoftheeasthimalayansyntaxis AT kalie acompositerupturemodelforthegreat1950assamearthquakeacrossthecuspoftheeasthimalayansyntaxis AT choudhurys acompositerupturemodelforthegreat1950assamearthquakeacrossthecuspoftheeasthimalayansyntaxis AT baruahs acompositerupturemodelforthegreat1950assamearthquakeacrossthecuspoftheeasthimalayansyntaxis AT etchebesm acompositerupturemodelforthegreat1950assamearthquakeacrossthecuspoftheeasthimalayansyntaxis AT karakasc acompositerupturemodelforthegreat1950assamearthquakeacrossthecuspoftheeasthimalayansyntaxis AT couduriercurveura compositerupturemodelforthegreat1950assamearthquakeacrossthecuspoftheeasthimalayansyntaxis AT tapponnierp compositerupturemodelforthegreat1950assamearthquakeacrossthecuspoftheeasthimalayansyntaxis AT okale compositerupturemodelforthegreat1950assamearthquakeacrossthecuspoftheeasthimalayansyntaxis AT vanderwoerdj compositerupturemodelforthegreat1950assamearthquakeacrossthecuspoftheeasthimalayansyntaxis AT kalie compositerupturemodelforthegreat1950assamearthquakeacrossthecuspoftheeasthimalayansyntaxis AT choudhurys compositerupturemodelforthegreat1950assamearthquakeacrossthecuspoftheeasthimalayansyntaxis AT baruahs compositerupturemodelforthegreat1950assamearthquakeacrossthecuspoftheeasthimalayansyntaxis AT etchebesm compositerupturemodelforthegreat1950assamearthquakeacrossthecuspoftheeasthimalayansyntaxis AT karakasc compositerupturemodelforthegreat1950assamearthquakeacrossthecuspoftheeasthimalayansyntaxis |