The argument from variation against using one’s own intuitions as evidence
In philosophical methodology, intuitions are used as evidence to support philosophical theories. In this paper, I evaluate the skeptical argument that variation in intuitions is good evidence that our intuitions are unreliable, and so we should be skeptical about our theories. I argue that the skept...
Main Author: | Goh, Esther |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Nanyang Business School |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142335 |
Similar Items
-
Philosophical Intuitions
by: Mark Fedyk
Published: (2009-12-01) -
Johnstone's View of Rhetorical and Dialectical Argument
by: Douglas Walton
Published: (2001-01-01) -
W poszukiwaniu tożsamości współczesnej filozofii przyrody
by: Jarosław Maciej Janowski
Published: (2021-12-01) -
Dziecko i filozofia. Spór o filozofowanie dzieci
by: Paweł Walczak
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Neopyrrhonism as Metaphilosophy: A Non-Quietist Proposal
by: Guadalupe Reinoso
Published: (2022-03-01)