Four-terminal perovskite on silicon tandem solar cells optimal measurement schemes
Semitransparent perovskite solar cells (SCs) and their potential integration with silicon SCs in tandem configurations attract significantly increasing interest in the photovoltaics community. In addition to being highly spectrally complementary, these perovskite and silicon SCs have very different...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142482 |
_version_ | 1826115038892523520 |
---|---|
author | Dewi, Herlina Arianita Wang, Hao Li, Jia Thway, Maung Lin, Fen Aberle, Armin G. Mathews, Nripan Mhaisalkar, Subodh Gautam Bruno, Annalisa |
author2 | School of Materials Science and Engineering |
author_facet | School of Materials Science and Engineering Dewi, Herlina Arianita Wang, Hao Li, Jia Thway, Maung Lin, Fen Aberle, Armin G. Mathews, Nripan Mhaisalkar, Subodh Gautam Bruno, Annalisa |
author_sort | Dewi, Herlina Arianita |
collection | NTU |
description | Semitransparent perovskite solar cells (SCs) and their potential integration with silicon SCs in tandem configurations attract significantly increasing interest in the photovoltaics community. In addition to being highly spectrally complementary, these perovskite and silicon SCs have very different optimal‐performing sizes and consequently ideal measurement schemes for their integration in four‐terminal (4T) tandem configurations need to be investigated in detail. Herein, the effect of different active areas on both perovskite and silicon SCs on their photovoltaic performances is investigated. Furthermore, the commonly used filtering 4T tandem measurement scheme (named as filtered) is systematically compared with the size‐matching scheme (named as masked) demonstrating that when using the same top semitransparent perovskite and bottom silicon SCs in different measurements schemes, the total 4T tandem power conversion efficiency (PCE) can differ by more than 1%. The concepts presented here highlight the importance of optimal measurement schemes to assess 4T tandem PCE and rationalize the effect of compromise between the subcells size matching and the identification of the maximum PCE potential. |
first_indexed | 2024-10-01T03:49:00Z |
format | Journal Article |
id | ntu-10356/142482 |
institution | Nanyang Technological University |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-10-01T03:49:00Z |
publishDate | 2020 |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | ntu-10356/1424822023-09-20T09:20:22Z Four-terminal perovskite on silicon tandem solar cells optimal measurement schemes Dewi, Herlina Arianita Wang, Hao Li, Jia Thway, Maung Lin, Fen Aberle, Armin G. Mathews, Nripan Mhaisalkar, Subodh Gautam Bruno, Annalisa School of Materials Science and Engineering Energy Research Institute @ NTU (ERI@N) Engineering::Materials Efficiencies Measurement Schemes Semitransparent perovskite solar cells (SCs) and their potential integration with silicon SCs in tandem configurations attract significantly increasing interest in the photovoltaics community. In addition to being highly spectrally complementary, these perovskite and silicon SCs have very different optimal‐performing sizes and consequently ideal measurement schemes for their integration in four‐terminal (4T) tandem configurations need to be investigated in detail. Herein, the effect of different active areas on both perovskite and silicon SCs on their photovoltaic performances is investigated. Furthermore, the commonly used filtering 4T tandem measurement scheme (named as filtered) is systematically compared with the size‐matching scheme (named as masked) demonstrating that when using the same top semitransparent perovskite and bottom silicon SCs in different measurements schemes, the total 4T tandem power conversion efficiency (PCE) can differ by more than 1%. The concepts presented here highlight the importance of optimal measurement schemes to assess 4T tandem PCE and rationalize the effect of compromise between the subcells size matching and the identification of the maximum PCE potential. 2020-06-22T09:57:44Z 2020-06-22T09:57:44Z 2019 Journal Article Dewi, H. A., Wang, H., Li, J., Thway, M., Lin, F., Abrele, A. G., . . . Bruno, A. (2020). Four-terminal perovskite on silicon tandem solar cells optimal measurement schemes. Energy Technology, 8(4), 1901267-. doi:10.1002/ente.201901267 2194-4296 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142482 10.1002/ente.201901267 2-s2.0-85076371220 4 8 en Energy Technology 10.21979/N9/D0MJCH This is the accepted version of the following article: Dewi, H. A., Wang, H., Li, J., Thway, M., Lin, F., Abrele, A. G., . . . Bruno, A. (2020). Four-terminal perovskite on silicon tandem solar cells optimal measurement schemes. Energy Technology, 8(4), 1901267-, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201901267. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with the Wiley Self-Archiving Policy [https://authorservices.wiley.com/authorresources/Journal-Authors/licensing/self-archiving.html]. application/pdf |
spellingShingle | Engineering::Materials Efficiencies Measurement Schemes Dewi, Herlina Arianita Wang, Hao Li, Jia Thway, Maung Lin, Fen Aberle, Armin G. Mathews, Nripan Mhaisalkar, Subodh Gautam Bruno, Annalisa Four-terminal perovskite on silicon tandem solar cells optimal measurement schemes |
title | Four-terminal perovskite on silicon tandem solar cells optimal measurement schemes |
title_full | Four-terminal perovskite on silicon tandem solar cells optimal measurement schemes |
title_fullStr | Four-terminal perovskite on silicon tandem solar cells optimal measurement schemes |
title_full_unstemmed | Four-terminal perovskite on silicon tandem solar cells optimal measurement schemes |
title_short | Four-terminal perovskite on silicon tandem solar cells optimal measurement schemes |
title_sort | four terminal perovskite on silicon tandem solar cells optimal measurement schemes |
topic | Engineering::Materials Efficiencies Measurement Schemes |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142482 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dewiherlinaarianita fourterminalperovskiteonsilicontandemsolarcellsoptimalmeasurementschemes AT wanghao fourterminalperovskiteonsilicontandemsolarcellsoptimalmeasurementschemes AT lijia fourterminalperovskiteonsilicontandemsolarcellsoptimalmeasurementschemes AT thwaymaung fourterminalperovskiteonsilicontandemsolarcellsoptimalmeasurementschemes AT linfen fourterminalperovskiteonsilicontandemsolarcellsoptimalmeasurementschemes AT aberlearming fourterminalperovskiteonsilicontandemsolarcellsoptimalmeasurementschemes AT mathewsnripan fourterminalperovskiteonsilicontandemsolarcellsoptimalmeasurementschemes AT mhaisalkarsubodhgautam fourterminalperovskiteonsilicontandemsolarcellsoptimalmeasurementschemes AT brunoannalisa fourterminalperovskiteonsilicontandemsolarcellsoptimalmeasurementschemes |