Reviewing resistances to reconceptualizing disability

I attempt to adjudicate the disagreement between those who seek to reconceptualise disability as mere-difference, and their opponents. I do so by reviewing a central conviction motivating the resistance, concerning the relationship between disability and well-being. I argue that the conviction depen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lim, Chong-Ming
Other Authors: School of Humanities
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/144206
_version_ 1826129750322577408
author Lim, Chong-Ming
author2 School of Humanities
author_facet School of Humanities
Lim, Chong-Ming
author_sort Lim, Chong-Ming
collection NTU
description I attempt to adjudicate the disagreement between those who seek to reconceptualise disability as mere-difference, and their opponents. I do so by reviewing a central conviction motivating the resistance, concerning the relationship between disability and well-being. I argue that the conviction depends on further considerations about the costs and extent of change involved in accommodating individuals with a particular disability trait. I conclude by considering three payoffs of this clarification.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T07:45:38Z
format Journal Article
id ntu-10356/144206
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T07:45:38Z
publishDate 2020
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/1442062020-10-21T01:41:08Z Reviewing resistances to reconceptualizing disability Lim, Chong-Ming School of Humanities Humanities::Philosophy Disabilities Resistances I attempt to adjudicate the disagreement between those who seek to reconceptualise disability as mere-difference, and their opponents. I do so by reviewing a central conviction motivating the resistance, concerning the relationship between disability and well-being. I argue that the conviction depends on further considerations about the costs and extent of change involved in accommodating individuals with a particular disability trait. I conclude by considering three payoffs of this clarification. Accepted version 2020-10-21T01:37:25Z 2020-10-21T01:37:25Z 2017 Journal Article Lim, C.-M. (2017). Reviewing resistances to reconceptualizing disability. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 117(3), 321–331. doi:10.1093/arisoc/aox007 0066-7374 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/144206 10.1093/arisoc/aox007 3 117 321 331 en Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society © 2017 Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Mind following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Lim, C.-M. (2017). Reviewing resistances to reconceptualizing disability. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 117(3), 321–331. doi:10.1093/arisoc/aox007 is available online at:https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aox007 application/pdf
spellingShingle Humanities::Philosophy
Disabilities
Resistances
Lim, Chong-Ming
Reviewing resistances to reconceptualizing disability
title Reviewing resistances to reconceptualizing disability
title_full Reviewing resistances to reconceptualizing disability
title_fullStr Reviewing resistances to reconceptualizing disability
title_full_unstemmed Reviewing resistances to reconceptualizing disability
title_short Reviewing resistances to reconceptualizing disability
title_sort reviewing resistances to reconceptualizing disability
topic Humanities::Philosophy
Disabilities
Resistances
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/144206
work_keys_str_mv AT limchongming reviewingresistancestoreconceptualizingdisability