Confirmation and the ordinal equivalence thesis
According to a widespread but implicit thesis in Bayesian confirmation theory, two confirmation measures are considered equivalent if they are ordinally equivalent—call this the “ordinal equivalence thesis” (OET). I argue that adopting OET has significant costs. First, adopting OET renders one incap...
Main Author: | Vassend, Olav B. |
---|---|
Other Authors: | School of Humanities |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/148744 |
Similar Items
-
Justifying the norms of inductive inference
by: Vassend, Olav B.
Published: (2022) -
Promoting users’ intention to share online health articles on social media : the role of confirmation bias
by: Zhao, Haiping, et al.
Published: (2020) -
A verisimilitude framework for inductive inference, with an application to phylogenetics
by: Vassend, Olav B.
Published: (2022) -
On evidence and rational beliefs : a thesis in defence of intrapersonal uniqueness
by: Ng, Sarah Sin Ci
Published: (2021) -
A Naïve-Bayes classifier for damage detection in engineering materials
by: Addin, O., et al.
Published: (2007)