A comparison of the battery fault tolerance ability of modular multilevel converters with half-bridge and full-bridge submodules
The modular multilevel converter (MMC) is a promising option to integrate battery energy storage systems (BESSs) into the power system. Both half-bridge submodules (SMs) and full-bridge SMs can be used to implement an MMC. For MMC-based BESS, it is important to have sufficient battery fault toleranc...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Conference Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/153358 |
_version_ | 1826119428283039744 |
---|---|
author | Liang, Gaowen Farivar, Glen G. Yadav, Gorla Naga Brahmendra Townsend, Christopher D. Ceballos, Salvador Tafti, Hossein Dehghani Pou, Josep |
author2 | School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering |
author_facet | School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Liang, Gaowen Farivar, Glen G. Yadav, Gorla Naga Brahmendra Townsend, Christopher D. Ceballos, Salvador Tafti, Hossein Dehghani Pou, Josep |
author_sort | Liang, Gaowen |
collection | NTU |
description | The modular multilevel converter (MMC) is a promising option to integrate battery energy storage systems (BESSs) into the power system. Both half-bridge submodules (SMs) and full-bridge SMs can be used to implement an MMC. For MMC-based BESS, it is important to have sufficient battery fault tolerance, which means the system can operate normally even when some SMs have faulty batteries or no batteries. This paper analyzes and compares the battery fault tolerance of MMC-based BESSs with half-bridge and full-bridge SMs. According to the quantitative comparison, the MMC with full-bridge SMs has considerably higher tolerance to battery faults when the active power requirement is relatively high. Simulation and experimental results are provided for the verification of the proposed analysis. |
first_indexed | 2024-10-01T05:00:08Z |
format | Conference Paper |
id | ntu-10356/153358 |
institution | Nanyang Technological University |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-10-01T05:00:08Z |
publishDate | 2021 |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | ntu-10356/1533582021-12-04T20:11:04Z A comparison of the battery fault tolerance ability of modular multilevel converters with half-bridge and full-bridge submodules Liang, Gaowen Farivar, Glen G. Yadav, Gorla Naga Brahmendra Townsend, Christopher D. Ceballos, Salvador Tafti, Hossein Dehghani Pou, Josep School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering 2021 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE) Energy Research Institute @ NTU (ERI@N) Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering Modular Multilevel Converter Fault Tolerance The modular multilevel converter (MMC) is a promising option to integrate battery energy storage systems (BESSs) into the power system. Both half-bridge submodules (SMs) and full-bridge SMs can be used to implement an MMC. For MMC-based BESS, it is important to have sufficient battery fault tolerance, which means the system can operate normally even when some SMs have faulty batteries or no batteries. This paper analyzes and compares the battery fault tolerance of MMC-based BESSs with half-bridge and full-bridge SMs. According to the quantitative comparison, the MMC with full-bridge SMs has considerably higher tolerance to battery faults when the active power requirement is relatively high. Simulation and experimental results are provided for the verification of the proposed analysis. Accepted version This work was supported by the Office of Naval Research U.S. under DUNS Code: 595886219. It has also been partially supported by the Spanish Centre for the Development of Industrial Technology (CDTI) through the "Cervera" program under the grant agreement CER-20191002 ENERISLA. 2021-11-25T08:41:09Z 2021-11-25T08:41:09Z 2021 Conference Paper Liang, G., Farivar, G. G., Yadav, G. N. B., Townsend, C. D., Ceballos, S., Tafti, H. D. & Pou, J. (2021). A comparison of the battery fault tolerance ability of modular multilevel converters with half-bridge and full-bridge submodules. 2021 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 153-159. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595122 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/153358 10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595122 153 159 en © 2021 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. The published version is available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595122. application/pdf |
spellingShingle | Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering Modular Multilevel Converter Fault Tolerance Liang, Gaowen Farivar, Glen G. Yadav, Gorla Naga Brahmendra Townsend, Christopher D. Ceballos, Salvador Tafti, Hossein Dehghani Pou, Josep A comparison of the battery fault tolerance ability of modular multilevel converters with half-bridge and full-bridge submodules |
title | A comparison of the battery fault tolerance ability of modular multilevel converters with half-bridge and full-bridge submodules |
title_full | A comparison of the battery fault tolerance ability of modular multilevel converters with half-bridge and full-bridge submodules |
title_fullStr | A comparison of the battery fault tolerance ability of modular multilevel converters with half-bridge and full-bridge submodules |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of the battery fault tolerance ability of modular multilevel converters with half-bridge and full-bridge submodules |
title_short | A comparison of the battery fault tolerance ability of modular multilevel converters with half-bridge and full-bridge submodules |
title_sort | comparison of the battery fault tolerance ability of modular multilevel converters with half bridge and full bridge submodules |
topic | Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering Modular Multilevel Converter Fault Tolerance |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/153358 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lianggaowen acomparisonofthebatteryfaulttoleranceabilityofmodularmultilevelconverterswithhalfbridgeandfullbridgesubmodules AT farivargleng acomparisonofthebatteryfaulttoleranceabilityofmodularmultilevelconverterswithhalfbridgeandfullbridgesubmodules AT yadavgorlanagabrahmendra acomparisonofthebatteryfaulttoleranceabilityofmodularmultilevelconverterswithhalfbridgeandfullbridgesubmodules AT townsendchristopherd acomparisonofthebatteryfaulttoleranceabilityofmodularmultilevelconverterswithhalfbridgeandfullbridgesubmodules AT ceballossalvador acomparisonofthebatteryfaulttoleranceabilityofmodularmultilevelconverterswithhalfbridgeandfullbridgesubmodules AT taftihosseindehghani acomparisonofthebatteryfaulttoleranceabilityofmodularmultilevelconverterswithhalfbridgeandfullbridgesubmodules AT poujosep acomparisonofthebatteryfaulttoleranceabilityofmodularmultilevelconverterswithhalfbridgeandfullbridgesubmodules AT lianggaowen comparisonofthebatteryfaulttoleranceabilityofmodularmultilevelconverterswithhalfbridgeandfullbridgesubmodules AT farivargleng comparisonofthebatteryfaulttoleranceabilityofmodularmultilevelconverterswithhalfbridgeandfullbridgesubmodules AT yadavgorlanagabrahmendra comparisonofthebatteryfaulttoleranceabilityofmodularmultilevelconverterswithhalfbridgeandfullbridgesubmodules AT townsendchristopherd comparisonofthebatteryfaulttoleranceabilityofmodularmultilevelconverterswithhalfbridgeandfullbridgesubmodules AT ceballossalvador comparisonofthebatteryfaulttoleranceabilityofmodularmultilevelconverterswithhalfbridgeandfullbridgesubmodules AT taftihosseindehghani comparisonofthebatteryfaulttoleranceabilityofmodularmultilevelconverterswithhalfbridgeandfullbridgesubmodules AT poujosep comparisonofthebatteryfaulttoleranceabilityofmodularmultilevelconverterswithhalfbridgeandfullbridgesubmodules |