Predatory publishing practices : is there life after Beall’s list?
Background. Scholarly communication is an ever-evolving practice. As publishing advanced from the printed format to digital formats, new trends, practices and platforms emerged in academia. As reputable publishers adapted their business models to accommodate open access, many non-reputable publisher...
Autor principal: | Nicholson, Denise Rosemary |
---|---|
Formato: | Journal Article |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/154338 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Are the predatory publishers collapsing or re-inventing themselves?
por: Petrişor, Alexandru-Ionuţ
Publicado: (2021) -
I don't think we should "combat" predatory publishers: An interview with Jeffrey Beall
por: Rafael Zaccaron, et al.
Publicado: (2024-03-01) -
Predatory journals: Perception, impact and use of Beall's list by the scientific community-A bibliometric big data study.
por: Georg Richtig, et al.
Publicado: (2023-01-01) -
Digital rights management and access to information : a developing country’s perspective
por: Nicholson, Denise Rosemary
Publicado: (2021) -
Mobile technologies – information on the move … or stuck in a groove? – a South African perspective
por: Nicholson, Denise Rosemary
Publicado: (2021)