A study exploring the collaborative relationships among Taiwanese fishery scientists

Background. Collaborative relationships support the progress of scientific research by providing a collaborator access to resources, skills, information, and technologies. Studies have highlighted the importance of collaborative relationships among scientists. However, less attention has been paid t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen, Chia-Hsiang, Ke, Hao-Ren
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/154354
_version_ 1811689594353090560
author Chen, Chia-Hsiang
Ke, Hao-Ren
author_facet Chen, Chia-Hsiang
Ke, Hao-Ren
author_sort Chen, Chia-Hsiang
collection NTU
description Background. Collaborative relationships support the progress of scientific research by providing a collaborator access to resources, skills, information, and technologies. Studies have highlighted the importance of collaborative relationships among scientists. However, less attention has been paid to the characteristics of the relationships. Objectives. This study identified two key concepts, intellectual and social, as a theoretical approach to investigate collaborative relationships among scientists. Methods.Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 Taiwanese fishery scientists at the Taiwan Fisheries Research Institute, the Academia Sinica, the National Taiwan University, the National Taiwan Ocean University, and the National Museum of Marine Biology & Aquarium. Results. The results reveal that intellectual relationships among fishery scientists involve solving research puzzles collaboratively, giving informal comments on colleagues’ work, and seeking professional recognition. Fishery scientists shape social relationships through academic activities such as collaborating with thesis supervisors as co-authors, selecting research partners according to their professional ability, and contributing to a local or global fish database for building individual professional identity. The fishery scientists considered co-authorship as a core requirement to maintain collaborative relationships. Support from thesis supervisors is important for facilitating collaborative relationships. This support affects the selection of known people as research partners, instead of selecting partners from different countries.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T05:50:35Z
format Journal Article
id ntu-10356/154354
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T05:50:35Z
publishDate 2021
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/1543542021-12-22T20:11:14Z A study exploring the collaborative relationships among Taiwanese fishery scientists Chen, Chia-Hsiang Ke, Hao-Ren Library and information science Background. Collaborative relationships support the progress of scientific research by providing a collaborator access to resources, skills, information, and technologies. Studies have highlighted the importance of collaborative relationships among scientists. However, less attention has been paid to the characteristics of the relationships. Objectives. This study identified two key concepts, intellectual and social, as a theoretical approach to investigate collaborative relationships among scientists. Methods.Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 Taiwanese fishery scientists at the Taiwan Fisheries Research Institute, the Academia Sinica, the National Taiwan University, the National Taiwan Ocean University, and the National Museum of Marine Biology & Aquarium. Results. The results reveal that intellectual relationships among fishery scientists involve solving research puzzles collaboratively, giving informal comments on colleagues’ work, and seeking professional recognition. Fishery scientists shape social relationships through academic activities such as collaborating with thesis supervisors as co-authors, selecting research partners according to their professional ability, and contributing to a local or global fish database for building individual professional identity. The fishery scientists considered co-authorship as a core requirement to maintain collaborative relationships. Support from thesis supervisors is important for facilitating collaborative relationships. This support affects the selection of known people as research partners, instead of selecting partners from different countries. Published version 2021-12-17T08:26:03Z 2021-12-17T08:26:03Z 2019 Journal Article Chen, C. & Ke, H. (2019). A study exploring the collaborative relationships among Taiwanese fishery scientists. Library and Information Science Research E-Journal, 29(1), 1-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.32655/LIBRES.2019.1.1 1058-6768 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/154354 10.32655/LIBRES.2019.1.1 1 29 1 13 en Library and Information Science Research E-Journal © 2019 Chia-Hsiang Chen, Hao-Ren Ke. All rights reserved. application/pdf
spellingShingle Library and information science
Chen, Chia-Hsiang
Ke, Hao-Ren
A study exploring the collaborative relationships among Taiwanese fishery scientists
title A study exploring the collaborative relationships among Taiwanese fishery scientists
title_full A study exploring the collaborative relationships among Taiwanese fishery scientists
title_fullStr A study exploring the collaborative relationships among Taiwanese fishery scientists
title_full_unstemmed A study exploring the collaborative relationships among Taiwanese fishery scientists
title_short A study exploring the collaborative relationships among Taiwanese fishery scientists
title_sort study exploring the collaborative relationships among taiwanese fishery scientists
topic Library and information science
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/154354
work_keys_str_mv AT chenchiahsiang astudyexploringthecollaborativerelationshipsamongtaiwanesefisheryscientists
AT kehaoren astudyexploringthecollaborativerelationshipsamongtaiwanesefisheryscientists
AT chenchiahsiang studyexploringthecollaborativerelationshipsamongtaiwanesefisheryscientists
AT kehaoren studyexploringthecollaborativerelationshipsamongtaiwanesefisheryscientists