Reply to the discussion on “effect of soil spatial variability on failure mechanisms and undrained capacities of strip foundations under uniaxial loading” by Zhe Luo

The authors recently published work on failure mechanisms and undrained capacities of strip foundations on spatial variable soils (Shen et al., 2021, called the original paper hereafter). In order to improve the computational efficiency of random finite element analysis (RFEA), a non-uniform mes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shen, Zhichao, Jin, Dalong, Pan, Qiujing, Yang, Haoqing, Chian, Siau Chen
Other Authors: School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/159750
_version_ 1826120535504846848
author Shen, Zhichao
Jin, Dalong
Pan, Qiujing
Yang, Haoqing
Chian, Siau Chen
author2 School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
author_facet School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Shen, Zhichao
Jin, Dalong
Pan, Qiujing
Yang, Haoqing
Chian, Siau Chen
author_sort Shen, Zhichao
collection NTU
description The authors recently published work on failure mechanisms and undrained capacities of strip foundations on spatial variable soils (Shen et al., 2021, called the original paper hereafter). In order to improve the computational efficiency of random finite element analysis (RFEA), a non-uniform mesh was employed in the original paper. Luo (2021) stated that such non-uniform mesh resulted in a different degree of variance reduction over the random field (RF) and thus disobeyed the stationarity of the RF based on viewpoints of spatial averaging (SA) discretization method. However, as introduced in Section 3.2 in the original paper, the midpoint (MP) discretization method was used to discretize the RF, rather than the SA discretization method. Note that MP and SA are two very different methods for the discretization of RF in the RFEA. The material value for an element is represented by the RF value calculated at its centroid for the MP discretization method, whereas the material value for an element is represented by the spatial average of RF over the element for the SA discretization method. There is spatial averaging for SA, which results in significant variance reduction for a very coarse mesh. In contrast, there is no spatial averaging for MP, and thus no variance reduction (Tabarroki and Ching, 2019). Therefore, the discusser’s judgement based on viewpoints of the SA discretization method to a RF discretized by the MP method is not relevant.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T05:18:03Z
format Journal Article
id ntu-10356/159750
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T05:18:03Z
publishDate 2022
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/1597502022-07-01T05:43:27Z Reply to the discussion on “effect of soil spatial variability on failure mechanisms and undrained capacities of strip foundations under uniaxial loading” by Zhe Luo Shen, Zhichao Jin, Dalong Pan, Qiujing Yang, Haoqing Chian, Siau Chen School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Engineering::Civil engineering Strength Soil The authors recently published work on failure mechanisms and undrained capacities of strip foundations on spatial variable soils (Shen et al., 2021, called the original paper hereafter). In order to improve the computational efficiency of random finite element analysis (RFEA), a non-uniform mesh was employed in the original paper. Luo (2021) stated that such non-uniform mesh resulted in a different degree of variance reduction over the random field (RF) and thus disobeyed the stationarity of the RF based on viewpoints of spatial averaging (SA) discretization method. However, as introduced in Section 3.2 in the original paper, the midpoint (MP) discretization method was used to discretize the RF, rather than the SA discretization method. Note that MP and SA are two very different methods for the discretization of RF in the RFEA. The material value for an element is represented by the RF value calculated at its centroid for the MP discretization method, whereas the material value for an element is represented by the spatial average of RF over the element for the SA discretization method. There is spatial averaging for SA, which results in significant variance reduction for a very coarse mesh. In contrast, there is no spatial averaging for MP, and thus no variance reduction (Tabarroki and Ching, 2019). Therefore, the discusser’s judgement based on viewpoints of the SA discretization method to a RF discretized by the MP method is not relevant. 2022-07-01T05:43:27Z 2022-07-01T05:43:27Z 2022 Journal Article Shen, Z., Jin, D., Pan, Q., Yang, H. & Chian, S. C. (2022). Reply to the discussion on “effect of soil spatial variability on failure mechanisms and undrained capacities of strip foundations under uniaxial loading” by Zhe Luo. Computers and Geotechnics, 142, 104539-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104539 0266-352X https://hdl.handle.net/10356/159750 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104539 2-s2.0-85118759096 142 104539 en Computers and Geotechnics © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Engineering::Civil engineering
Strength
Soil
Shen, Zhichao
Jin, Dalong
Pan, Qiujing
Yang, Haoqing
Chian, Siau Chen
Reply to the discussion on “effect of soil spatial variability on failure mechanisms and undrained capacities of strip foundations under uniaxial loading” by Zhe Luo
title Reply to the discussion on “effect of soil spatial variability on failure mechanisms and undrained capacities of strip foundations under uniaxial loading” by Zhe Luo
title_full Reply to the discussion on “effect of soil spatial variability on failure mechanisms and undrained capacities of strip foundations under uniaxial loading” by Zhe Luo
title_fullStr Reply to the discussion on “effect of soil spatial variability on failure mechanisms and undrained capacities of strip foundations under uniaxial loading” by Zhe Luo
title_full_unstemmed Reply to the discussion on “effect of soil spatial variability on failure mechanisms and undrained capacities of strip foundations under uniaxial loading” by Zhe Luo
title_short Reply to the discussion on “effect of soil spatial variability on failure mechanisms and undrained capacities of strip foundations under uniaxial loading” by Zhe Luo
title_sort reply to the discussion on effect of soil spatial variability on failure mechanisms and undrained capacities of strip foundations under uniaxial loading by zhe luo
topic Engineering::Civil engineering
Strength
Soil
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/159750
work_keys_str_mv AT shenzhichao replytothediscussiononeffectofsoilspatialvariabilityonfailuremechanismsandundrainedcapacitiesofstripfoundationsunderuniaxialloadingbyzheluo
AT jindalong replytothediscussiononeffectofsoilspatialvariabilityonfailuremechanismsandundrainedcapacitiesofstripfoundationsunderuniaxialloadingbyzheluo
AT panqiujing replytothediscussiononeffectofsoilspatialvariabilityonfailuremechanismsandundrainedcapacitiesofstripfoundationsunderuniaxialloadingbyzheluo
AT yanghaoqing replytothediscussiononeffectofsoilspatialvariabilityonfailuremechanismsandundrainedcapacitiesofstripfoundationsunderuniaxialloadingbyzheluo
AT chiansiauchen replytothediscussiononeffectofsoilspatialvariabilityonfailuremechanismsandundrainedcapacitiesofstripfoundationsunderuniaxialloadingbyzheluo