Canadian design standard for slender reinforced concrete columns

Most columns are termed as short columns and fail when the material reaches its ultimate capacity under the applied loads. However, columns are subjected to moment as well, with the increase of length (on the trend to be slender), there is a possibility that columns fail due to lateral deflection. F...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zhu, Ning.
Other Authors: Chuang Poon Hwei
Format: Final Year Project (FYP)
Language:English
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/16089
_version_ 1826124275404242944
author Zhu, Ning.
author2 Chuang Poon Hwei
author_facet Chuang Poon Hwei
Zhu, Ning.
author_sort Zhu, Ning.
collection NTU
description Most columns are termed as short columns and fail when the material reaches its ultimate capacity under the applied loads. However, columns are subjected to moment as well, with the increase of length (on the trend to be slender), there is a possibility that columns fail due to lateral deflection. For the procedure of column design, axial loading is firstly treated. Methods are then given for design of sections subjected to both axial loads and moment. Acceptable design methods to provide a reliable, economic and safe solution are very important. The purpose of this project is to evaluate several kinds of design methods and to recommend the suitability of each kind of method under different conditions. In this project, Canadian Design Method CAN/CSA-A23.3 (2004) is of the major interest and used to predict the failure loads of 150 slender reinforced high strength concrete columns. The results are then compared with predictions from ACI318 (2008), EC2 (2004), BS8110 (1997), P-Delta method, Transformation method and experimental data. It can be concluded that CAN/CSA-A23.3 (2004) generally predicts lower failure loads of columns and is more conservative than the rest of other five prediction methods, however, CAN/CSA-A23.3 (2004) is not applicable for prediction of very slender column, where slenderness ratio is greater than 100, for which second-order analysis is required. Columns with lower initial eccentricity/depth ratio have faster decreasing rate of failure loads than columns with higher initial eccentricity/depth ratio. In the case that slenderness ratio is between 30 and 60, ACI318 (2008) and Transformation method predicts the most accurate columns’ failure loads. When slenderness ratio is in the range from 60 to 100, BS8110 (1997) predicts the most accurate results. The results predicted form P-delta method and Transformation are generally quite close.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T06:18:00Z
format Final Year Project (FYP)
id ntu-10356/16089
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T06:18:00Z
publishDate 2009
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/160892023-03-03T17:06:42Z Canadian design standard for slender reinforced concrete columns Zhu, Ning. Chuang Poon Hwei School of Civil and Environmental Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering::Structures and design Most columns are termed as short columns and fail when the material reaches its ultimate capacity under the applied loads. However, columns are subjected to moment as well, with the increase of length (on the trend to be slender), there is a possibility that columns fail due to lateral deflection. For the procedure of column design, axial loading is firstly treated. Methods are then given for design of sections subjected to both axial loads and moment. Acceptable design methods to provide a reliable, economic and safe solution are very important. The purpose of this project is to evaluate several kinds of design methods and to recommend the suitability of each kind of method under different conditions. In this project, Canadian Design Method CAN/CSA-A23.3 (2004) is of the major interest and used to predict the failure loads of 150 slender reinforced high strength concrete columns. The results are then compared with predictions from ACI318 (2008), EC2 (2004), BS8110 (1997), P-Delta method, Transformation method and experimental data. It can be concluded that CAN/CSA-A23.3 (2004) generally predicts lower failure loads of columns and is more conservative than the rest of other five prediction methods, however, CAN/CSA-A23.3 (2004) is not applicable for prediction of very slender column, where slenderness ratio is greater than 100, for which second-order analysis is required. Columns with lower initial eccentricity/depth ratio have faster decreasing rate of failure loads than columns with higher initial eccentricity/depth ratio. In the case that slenderness ratio is between 30 and 60, ACI318 (2008) and Transformation method predicts the most accurate columns’ failure loads. When slenderness ratio is in the range from 60 to 100, BS8110 (1997) predicts the most accurate results. The results predicted form P-delta method and Transformation are generally quite close. Bachelor of Engineering (Civil) 2009-05-21T01:32:21Z 2009-05-21T01:32:21Z 2009 2009 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/16089 en Nanyang Technological University 55 p. application/pdf
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering::Structures and design
Zhu, Ning.
Canadian design standard for slender reinforced concrete columns
title Canadian design standard for slender reinforced concrete columns
title_full Canadian design standard for slender reinforced concrete columns
title_fullStr Canadian design standard for slender reinforced concrete columns
title_full_unstemmed Canadian design standard for slender reinforced concrete columns
title_short Canadian design standard for slender reinforced concrete columns
title_sort canadian design standard for slender reinforced concrete columns
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering::Structures and design
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/16089
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuning canadiandesignstandardforslenderreinforcedconcretecolumns