Cyclists’ preference study in using four types of cycling facilities in Singapore
Singapore enacted traffic regulation in 2017 that allows cyclists to ride alongside pedestrians on off-road footways on a nation-wide basis. There now exists four types of cycling facilities in Singapore: off-road cycling path, on-road cycling lane, shared on-road lane, and shared off-road footway....
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/163194 |
_version_ | 1811696918650159104 |
---|---|
author | Che, Maohao Secadiningrat, Julius Raditya Upahita, Dwi Phalita Wong, Yiik Diew Lum, Kit Meng |
author2 | School of Civil and Environmental Engineering |
author_facet | School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Che, Maohao Secadiningrat, Julius Raditya Upahita, Dwi Phalita Wong, Yiik Diew Lum, Kit Meng |
author_sort | Che, Maohao |
collection | NTU |
description | Singapore enacted traffic regulation in 2017 that allows cyclists to ride alongside pedestrians on off-road footways on a nation-wide basis. There now exists four types of cycling facilities in Singapore: off-road cycling path, on-road cycling lane, shared on-road lane, and shared off-road footway. A cyclists’ preference study was conducted to identify the most important factors (as considered by cyclist subjects) that contribute to preferences of cycling facilities. The perceptions of users (as a cyclist), as well as users’ ratings of the cycling facilities, were investigated. Free association analysis suggests that users (as a cyclist) value safety the most. Their opinions are also heavily influenced by whether there are interactions with other types of users. Whereas dedicated pathways are most preferred, cyclists do have greater preference to ride on shared-use footways than on roadways with motorised vehicles. Shared footways are highly feasible cycling facility to cater to the increasing demand for cycling activities in Singapore. |
first_indexed | 2024-10-01T07:47:00Z |
format | Journal Article |
id | ntu-10356/163194 |
institution | Nanyang Technological University |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-10-01T07:47:00Z |
publishDate | 2022 |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | ntu-10356/1631942022-11-28T07:36:06Z Cyclists’ preference study in using four types of cycling facilities in Singapore Che, Maohao Secadiningrat, Julius Raditya Upahita, Dwi Phalita Wong, Yiik Diew Lum, Kit Meng School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Engineering::Civil engineering Shared Space Dedicated Space Singapore enacted traffic regulation in 2017 that allows cyclists to ride alongside pedestrians on off-road footways on a nation-wide basis. There now exists four types of cycling facilities in Singapore: off-road cycling path, on-road cycling lane, shared on-road lane, and shared off-road footway. A cyclists’ preference study was conducted to identify the most important factors (as considered by cyclist subjects) that contribute to preferences of cycling facilities. The perceptions of users (as a cyclist), as well as users’ ratings of the cycling facilities, were investigated. Free association analysis suggests that users (as a cyclist) value safety the most. Their opinions are also heavily influenced by whether there are interactions with other types of users. Whereas dedicated pathways are most preferred, cyclists do have greater preference to ride on shared-use footways than on roadways with motorised vehicles. Shared footways are highly feasible cycling facility to cater to the increasing demand for cycling activities in Singapore. 2022-11-28T07:36:06Z 2022-11-28T07:36:06Z 2021 Journal Article Che, M., Secadiningrat, J. R., Upahita, D. P., Wong, Y. D. & Lum, K. M. (2021). Cyclists’ preference study in using four types of cycling facilities in Singapore. Case Studies On Transport Policy, 9(4), 1810-1817. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.09.005 2213-624X https://hdl.handle.net/10356/163194 10.1016/j.cstp.2021.09.005 2-s2.0-85117124260 4 9 1810 1817 en Case Studies on Transport Policy © 2021 World Conference on Transport Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
spellingShingle | Engineering::Civil engineering Shared Space Dedicated Space Che, Maohao Secadiningrat, Julius Raditya Upahita, Dwi Phalita Wong, Yiik Diew Lum, Kit Meng Cyclists’ preference study in using four types of cycling facilities in Singapore |
title | Cyclists’ preference study in using four types of cycling facilities in Singapore |
title_full | Cyclists’ preference study in using four types of cycling facilities in Singapore |
title_fullStr | Cyclists’ preference study in using four types of cycling facilities in Singapore |
title_full_unstemmed | Cyclists’ preference study in using four types of cycling facilities in Singapore |
title_short | Cyclists’ preference study in using four types of cycling facilities in Singapore |
title_sort | cyclists preference study in using four types of cycling facilities in singapore |
topic | Engineering::Civil engineering Shared Space Dedicated Space |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/163194 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chemaohao cyclistspreferencestudyinusingfourtypesofcyclingfacilitiesinsingapore AT secadiningratjuliusraditya cyclistspreferencestudyinusingfourtypesofcyclingfacilitiesinsingapore AT upahitadwiphalita cyclistspreferencestudyinusingfourtypesofcyclingfacilitiesinsingapore AT wongyiikdiew cyclistspreferencestudyinusingfourtypesofcyclingfacilitiesinsingapore AT lumkitmeng cyclistspreferencestudyinusingfourtypesofcyclingfacilitiesinsingapore |