Accommodating the plural nature of disadvantage in Rawls' framework of justice as fairness

The paper’s main aim is to show that a plural nature of disadvantage can be fitted into John Rawls’ framework of justice as fairness. This is an interesting consideration because Rawls has been criticized for leaving out certain real-world disadvantages from the purview of justice as fairness. If a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tan, Stefanie Kai Ying
Other Authors: Lim Chong Ming
Format: Final Year Project (FYP)
Language:English
Published: Nanyang Technological University 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/165454
_version_ 1826118979504046080
author Tan, Stefanie Kai Ying
author2 Lim Chong Ming
author_facet Lim Chong Ming
Tan, Stefanie Kai Ying
author_sort Tan, Stefanie Kai Ying
collection NTU
description The paper’s main aim is to show that a plural nature of disadvantage can be fitted into John Rawls’ framework of justice as fairness. This is an interesting consideration because Rawls has been criticized for leaving out certain real-world disadvantages from the purview of justice as fairness. If a fit can be made, then the thesis will demonstrate how Rawls’ framework is designed to address all sorts of disadvantages that exist. A comb through Rawls’ A Theory of Justice (Revised Edition) is sufficient for the paper to construct this framework because this book contains the fundamental tenets for Rawlsian justice. As for the plural nature of disadvantage, the paper adopts the views posited by Avner Deshalit and Jonathan Wolff in Disadvantage. My main claim is that Rawls’ framework can accommodate the plural nature of disadvantage under non-ideal theory. More specifically, I fit this understanding of disadvantage into the general facts provision within the original position. Primarily, this paper will focus on justifying why this fit can be made, and demonstrating how it plays out in Rawls’ framework.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T04:52:26Z
format Final Year Project (FYP)
id ntu-10356/165454
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T04:52:26Z
publishDate 2023
publisher Nanyang Technological University
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/1654542023-04-01T16:55:54Z Accommodating the plural nature of disadvantage in Rawls' framework of justice as fairness Tan, Stefanie Kai Ying Lim Chong Ming School of Humanities cm.lim@ntu.edu.sg Humanities::Philosophy The paper’s main aim is to show that a plural nature of disadvantage can be fitted into John Rawls’ framework of justice as fairness. This is an interesting consideration because Rawls has been criticized for leaving out certain real-world disadvantages from the purview of justice as fairness. If a fit can be made, then the thesis will demonstrate how Rawls’ framework is designed to address all sorts of disadvantages that exist. A comb through Rawls’ A Theory of Justice (Revised Edition) is sufficient for the paper to construct this framework because this book contains the fundamental tenets for Rawlsian justice. As for the plural nature of disadvantage, the paper adopts the views posited by Avner Deshalit and Jonathan Wolff in Disadvantage. My main claim is that Rawls’ framework can accommodate the plural nature of disadvantage under non-ideal theory. More specifically, I fit this understanding of disadvantage into the general facts provision within the original position. Primarily, this paper will focus on justifying why this fit can be made, and demonstrating how it plays out in Rawls’ framework. Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy 2023-03-27T08:17:10Z 2023-03-27T08:17:10Z 2023 Final Year Project (FYP) Tan, S. K. Y. (2023). Accommodating the plural nature of disadvantage in Rawls' framework of justice as fairness. Final Year Project (FYP), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/165454 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/165454 en application/pdf Nanyang Technological University
spellingShingle Humanities::Philosophy
Tan, Stefanie Kai Ying
Accommodating the plural nature of disadvantage in Rawls' framework of justice as fairness
title Accommodating the plural nature of disadvantage in Rawls' framework of justice as fairness
title_full Accommodating the plural nature of disadvantage in Rawls' framework of justice as fairness
title_fullStr Accommodating the plural nature of disadvantage in Rawls' framework of justice as fairness
title_full_unstemmed Accommodating the plural nature of disadvantage in Rawls' framework of justice as fairness
title_short Accommodating the plural nature of disadvantage in Rawls' framework of justice as fairness
title_sort accommodating the plural nature of disadvantage in rawls framework of justice as fairness
topic Humanities::Philosophy
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/165454
work_keys_str_mv AT tanstefaniekaiying accommodatingthepluralnatureofdisadvantageinrawlsframeworkofjusticeasfairness