Making art public in Singapore: performativity, communication, and archiving Tang Da Wu's practice (1979 to 1995)

Making Art Public in Singapore: Performativity, Communication, and Archiving Tang Da Wu’s Practice (1979 to 1995) examines the city-state and its ‘public space-in-the-making’ (Hee, 2017) as the locus of performativity, communication, and acts of archival practice. It explores how in a period of cult...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tan, Adrian Peng Chai
Other Authors: -
Format: Thesis-Doctor of Philosophy
Language:English
Published: Nanyang Technological University 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169970
_version_ 1811684411088830464
author Tan, Adrian Peng Chai
author2 -
author_facet -
Tan, Adrian Peng Chai
author_sort Tan, Adrian Peng Chai
collection NTU
description Making Art Public in Singapore: Performativity, Communication, and Archiving Tang Da Wu’s Practice (1979 to 1995) examines the city-state and its ‘public space-in-the-making’ (Hee, 2017) as the locus of performativity, communication, and acts of archival practice. It explores how in a period of cultural development and spatial change between 1979 and 1995, Tang's practice alternated between intervening in the public sphere and the museum, provoking modifications of the space of everyday life, in giving rise to ‘making things visible that would otherwise remain invisible’ in ‘interrupting the city’ (Gielen, 2015). Through an analysis of events, activities, and exhibitions, a close examination of Tang’s site- specific and durational works made in public spaces trace the artist’s enactment of his ‘right to the city’ (Harvey, 2008; Lefebvre, 1996; Purcell, 2014). Tang’s Earth Work (1979, 1980) and its re-staging at National Gallery Singapore in 2016 is a cue for the significance of connecting the idea of publicness with themes of repetition, re-enactment, and intervening in public space. Starting from Earth Work is helpful in developing an understanding of the impact of radically changing urban forms and showing how the city undergoing tabula rasa (or clean slate) connected to the development of making art in and with the city. It is through a close study of public art, dialogical art, and performativity; that these negotiations, tactics, and critical strategies of an artist collaborating with cultural institutions like National Museum Art Gallery (NMAG) and artists associated with The Artists Village (TAV); can be read as creative labour. Rather than a linear art historical understanding of the artist, a multidisciplinary approach is adopted in which the city (as protagonist) is encountered through the analytical framework of art, public space, and the archive’s praxis in contemporary art. The question of why and how Tang made art in and intervened in public space, is explored in the operational, processual, and communicative methods adopted in events like The First and Second Open Studio Shows (1989) and A Sculpture Seminar 1 (1991). The uses of bodies, actions, and the installative are further analysed in Life Boat (1989), Tiger’s Whip (1991, 1992), and Don’t Give Money to the Arts (1995) in understanding how and why these temporal engagements with the city spatially and socially challenged and disrupted the role of an artist in society. Tang’s practice features prominently in the collection of documents, re-staging of archival installations, and re-narration of archival photographic representations in Koh Nguang How’s Singapore Art Archive Project (SAAP). SAAP is an important ‘subject' and ‘object’ in the analysing of events as ‘scenes’ in the performative cityscape of Singapore, where this study was made possible through the artist’s ‘presence’ as observer, audience, and documenter. For this reason, giving attention to SAAP as ‘archives of artworks to archive as artwork’ articulates a new focus to one’s reading of the city, the artists’ encounters with the public, their embodied experiences connected to human desire, aspirations, and sometimes, utopian ideas about transforming Singapore. In arguing for voices of artists to be heard and their pedagogical and cultural role realised, there is an emergent need for an immersion and a more discursive look at how nations, institutions, and artists engage with the archive in establishing art production, new dialogue, and new histories.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T04:28:12Z
format Thesis-Doctor of Philosophy
id ntu-10356/169970
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T04:28:12Z
publishDate 2023
publisher Nanyang Technological University
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/1699702023-09-04T07:32:08Z Making art public in Singapore: performativity, communication, and archiving Tang Da Wu's practice (1979 to 1995) Tan, Adrian Peng Chai - School of Art, Design and Media Michael John Kirk Walsh mwalsh@scad.edu Visual arts and music::Art history Making Art Public in Singapore: Performativity, Communication, and Archiving Tang Da Wu’s Practice (1979 to 1995) examines the city-state and its ‘public space-in-the-making’ (Hee, 2017) as the locus of performativity, communication, and acts of archival practice. It explores how in a period of cultural development and spatial change between 1979 and 1995, Tang's practice alternated between intervening in the public sphere and the museum, provoking modifications of the space of everyday life, in giving rise to ‘making things visible that would otherwise remain invisible’ in ‘interrupting the city’ (Gielen, 2015). Through an analysis of events, activities, and exhibitions, a close examination of Tang’s site- specific and durational works made in public spaces trace the artist’s enactment of his ‘right to the city’ (Harvey, 2008; Lefebvre, 1996; Purcell, 2014). Tang’s Earth Work (1979, 1980) and its re-staging at National Gallery Singapore in 2016 is a cue for the significance of connecting the idea of publicness with themes of repetition, re-enactment, and intervening in public space. Starting from Earth Work is helpful in developing an understanding of the impact of radically changing urban forms and showing how the city undergoing tabula rasa (or clean slate) connected to the development of making art in and with the city. It is through a close study of public art, dialogical art, and performativity; that these negotiations, tactics, and critical strategies of an artist collaborating with cultural institutions like National Museum Art Gallery (NMAG) and artists associated with The Artists Village (TAV); can be read as creative labour. Rather than a linear art historical understanding of the artist, a multidisciplinary approach is adopted in which the city (as protagonist) is encountered through the analytical framework of art, public space, and the archive’s praxis in contemporary art. The question of why and how Tang made art in and intervened in public space, is explored in the operational, processual, and communicative methods adopted in events like The First and Second Open Studio Shows (1989) and A Sculpture Seminar 1 (1991). The uses of bodies, actions, and the installative are further analysed in Life Boat (1989), Tiger’s Whip (1991, 1992), and Don’t Give Money to the Arts (1995) in understanding how and why these temporal engagements with the city spatially and socially challenged and disrupted the role of an artist in society. Tang’s practice features prominently in the collection of documents, re-staging of archival installations, and re-narration of archival photographic representations in Koh Nguang How’s Singapore Art Archive Project (SAAP). SAAP is an important ‘subject' and ‘object’ in the analysing of events as ‘scenes’ in the performative cityscape of Singapore, where this study was made possible through the artist’s ‘presence’ as observer, audience, and documenter. For this reason, giving attention to SAAP as ‘archives of artworks to archive as artwork’ articulates a new focus to one’s reading of the city, the artists’ encounters with the public, their embodied experiences connected to human desire, aspirations, and sometimes, utopian ideas about transforming Singapore. In arguing for voices of artists to be heard and their pedagogical and cultural role realised, there is an emergent need for an immersion and a more discursive look at how nations, institutions, and artists engage with the archive in establishing art production, new dialogue, and new histories. Doctor of Philosophy 2023-08-18T03:03:20Z 2023-08-18T03:03:20Z 2022 Thesis-Doctor of Philosophy Tan, A. P. C. (2022). Making art public in Singapore: performativity, communication, and archiving Tang Da Wu's practice (1979 to 1995). Doctoral thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169970 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169970 10.32657/10356/169970 en This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). application/pdf Nanyang Technological University
spellingShingle Visual arts and music::Art history
Tan, Adrian Peng Chai
Making art public in Singapore: performativity, communication, and archiving Tang Da Wu's practice (1979 to 1995)
title Making art public in Singapore: performativity, communication, and archiving Tang Da Wu's practice (1979 to 1995)
title_full Making art public in Singapore: performativity, communication, and archiving Tang Da Wu's practice (1979 to 1995)
title_fullStr Making art public in Singapore: performativity, communication, and archiving Tang Da Wu's practice (1979 to 1995)
title_full_unstemmed Making art public in Singapore: performativity, communication, and archiving Tang Da Wu's practice (1979 to 1995)
title_short Making art public in Singapore: performativity, communication, and archiving Tang Da Wu's practice (1979 to 1995)
title_sort making art public in singapore performativity communication and archiving tang da wu s practice 1979 to 1995
topic Visual arts and music::Art history
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169970
work_keys_str_mv AT tanadrianpengchai makingartpublicinsingaporeperformativitycommunicationandarchivingtangdawuspractice1979to1995