Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic total gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose: Minimally-invasive total gastrectomy (MITG) is associated with lower morbidity in comparison to open total gastrectomy but requires a learning curve (LC). We aimed to perform a pooled analysis of the number of cases required to surmount the LC (NLC) in MITG. Methods: A systematic review of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chan, Kai Siang, Oo, Aung Myint
Other Authors: Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine)
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/172944
_version_ 1811691541740126208
author Chan, Kai Siang
Oo, Aung Myint
author2 Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine)
author_facet Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine)
Chan, Kai Siang
Oo, Aung Myint
author_sort Chan, Kai Siang
collection NTU
description Purpose: Minimally-invasive total gastrectomy (MITG) is associated with lower morbidity in comparison to open total gastrectomy but requires a learning curve (LC). We aimed to perform a pooled analysis of the number of cases required to surmount the LC (NLC) in MITG. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library from inception until August 2022 was performed for studies reporting the LC in laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) and/or robotic total gastrectomy (RTG). Poisson mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) was used to determine the NLC. Negative binomial regression was performed as a comparative analysis. Results: There were 12 articles with 18 data sets: 12 data sets (n = 1202 patients) on LTG and 6 data sets (n = 318 patients) on RTG. The majority of studies were conducted in East Asia (94.4%). The majority of the data sets (n = 12/18, 66.7%) used non-arbitrary analyses. The NLC was significantly smaller in RTG in comparison to LTG [RTG 20.5 (95% CI 17.0–24.5); LTG 43.9 (95% CI 40.2–47.8); incidence rate ratio 0.47, p < 0.001]. The NLC was comparable between totally-laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) and laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) [LATG 39.0 (95% CI 30.8–48.7); TLTG 36.0 (95% CI 30.4–42.4)]. Conclusions: The LC for RTG was significantly shorter for LTG. However existing studies are heterogeneous.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T06:21:32Z
format Journal Article
id ntu-10356/172944
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T06:21:32Z
publishDate 2024
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/1729442024-01-03T05:52:47Z Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic total gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Chan, Kai Siang Oo, Aung Myint Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) Tan Tock Seng Hospital Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, NUS Science::Medicine Gastrectomy Gastric Cancer Purpose: Minimally-invasive total gastrectomy (MITG) is associated with lower morbidity in comparison to open total gastrectomy but requires a learning curve (LC). We aimed to perform a pooled analysis of the number of cases required to surmount the LC (NLC) in MITG. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library from inception until August 2022 was performed for studies reporting the LC in laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) and/or robotic total gastrectomy (RTG). Poisson mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) was used to determine the NLC. Negative binomial regression was performed as a comparative analysis. Results: There were 12 articles with 18 data sets: 12 data sets (n = 1202 patients) on LTG and 6 data sets (n = 318 patients) on RTG. The majority of studies were conducted in East Asia (94.4%). The majority of the data sets (n = 12/18, 66.7%) used non-arbitrary analyses. The NLC was significantly smaller in RTG in comparison to LTG [RTG 20.5 (95% CI 17.0–24.5); LTG 43.9 (95% CI 40.2–47.8); incidence rate ratio 0.47, p < 0.001]. The NLC was comparable between totally-laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) and laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) [LATG 39.0 (95% CI 30.8–48.7); TLTG 36.0 (95% CI 30.4–42.4)]. Conclusions: The LC for RTG was significantly shorter for LTG. However existing studies are heterogeneous. 2024-01-03T05:30:29Z 2024-01-03T05:30:29Z 2023 Journal Article Chan, K. S. & Oo, A. M. (2023). Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic total gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery Today. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-023-02672-2 0941-1291 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/172944 10.1007/s00595-023-02672-2 36912987 2-s2.0-85149921801 en Surgery Today © 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Science::Medicine
Gastrectomy
Gastric Cancer
Chan, Kai Siang
Oo, Aung Myint
Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic total gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic total gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic total gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic total gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic total gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic total gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic total gastrectomy a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Science::Medicine
Gastrectomy
Gastric Cancer
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/172944
work_keys_str_mv AT chankaisiang learningcurveoflaparoscopicandrobotictotalgastrectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ooaungmyint learningcurveoflaparoscopicandrobotictotalgastrectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis