An efficient strategy for evaluating new non-invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer: the guiding principles

Objective: New screening tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) are rapidly emerging. Conducting trials with mortality reduction as the end point supporting their adoption is challenging. We re-examined the principles underlying evaluation of new non-invasive tests in view of technological developments a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bresalier, Robert S., Senore, Carlo, Young, Graeme P., Allison, James, Benamouzig, Robert, Benton, Sally, Bossuyt, Patrick M. M., Caro, Luis, Carvalho, Beatriz, Chiu, Han-Mo, Coupé, Veerle M. H., de Klaver, Willemijn, de Klerk, Clasine Maria, Dekker, Evelien, Dolwani, Sunil, Fraser, Callum G., Grady, William, Guittet, Lydia, Gupta, Samir, Halloran, Stephen P., Haug, Ulrike, Hoff, Geir, Itzkowitz, Steven, Kortlever, Tim, Koulaouzidis, Anastasios, Ladabaum, Uri, Lauby-Secretan, Beatrice, Leja, Mārcis, Levin, Bernard, Levin, Theodore Robert, Macrae, Finlay, Meijer, Gerrit A., Melson, Joshua, O'Morain, Colm, Parry, Susan, Rabeneck, Linda, Ransohoff, David F., Sáenz, Roque, Saito, Hiroshi, Sanduleanu-Dascalescu, Silvia, Schoen, Robert E., Selby, Kevin, Singh, Harminder, Steele, Robert J. C., Sung, Joseph Jao Yiu, Symonds, Erin Leigh, Winawer, Sidney J.
Other Authors: Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine)
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/174162
_version_ 1826111285445525504
author Bresalier, Robert S.
Senore, Carlo
Young, Graeme P.
Allison, James
Benamouzig, Robert
Benton, Sally
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
Caro, Luis
Carvalho, Beatriz
Chiu, Han-Mo
Coupé, Veerle M. H.
de Klaver, Willemijn
de Klerk, Clasine Maria
Dekker, Evelien
Dolwani, Sunil
Fraser, Callum G.
Grady, William
Guittet, Lydia
Gupta, Samir
Halloran, Stephen P.
Haug, Ulrike
Hoff, Geir
Itzkowitz, Steven
Kortlever, Tim
Koulaouzidis, Anastasios
Ladabaum, Uri
Lauby-Secretan, Beatrice
Leja, Mārcis
Levin, Bernard
Levin, Theodore Robert
Macrae, Finlay
Meijer, Gerrit A.
Melson, Joshua
O'Morain, Colm
Parry, Susan
Rabeneck, Linda
Ransohoff, David F.
Sáenz, Roque
Saito, Hiroshi
Sanduleanu-Dascalescu, Silvia
Schoen, Robert E.
Selby, Kevin
Singh, Harminder
Steele, Robert J. C.
Sung, Joseph Jao Yiu
Symonds, Erin Leigh
Winawer, Sidney J.
author2 Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine)
author_facet Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine)
Bresalier, Robert S.
Senore, Carlo
Young, Graeme P.
Allison, James
Benamouzig, Robert
Benton, Sally
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
Caro, Luis
Carvalho, Beatriz
Chiu, Han-Mo
Coupé, Veerle M. H.
de Klaver, Willemijn
de Klerk, Clasine Maria
Dekker, Evelien
Dolwani, Sunil
Fraser, Callum G.
Grady, William
Guittet, Lydia
Gupta, Samir
Halloran, Stephen P.
Haug, Ulrike
Hoff, Geir
Itzkowitz, Steven
Kortlever, Tim
Koulaouzidis, Anastasios
Ladabaum, Uri
Lauby-Secretan, Beatrice
Leja, Mārcis
Levin, Bernard
Levin, Theodore Robert
Macrae, Finlay
Meijer, Gerrit A.
Melson, Joshua
O'Morain, Colm
Parry, Susan
Rabeneck, Linda
Ransohoff, David F.
Sáenz, Roque
Saito, Hiroshi
Sanduleanu-Dascalescu, Silvia
Schoen, Robert E.
Selby, Kevin
Singh, Harminder
Steele, Robert J. C.
Sung, Joseph Jao Yiu
Symonds, Erin Leigh
Winawer, Sidney J.
author_sort Bresalier, Robert S.
collection NTU
description Objective: New screening tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) are rapidly emerging. Conducting trials with mortality reduction as the end point supporting their adoption is challenging. We re-examined the principles underlying evaluation of new non-invasive tests in view of technological developments and identification of new biomarkers. Design: A formal consensus approach involving a multidisciplinary expert panel revised eight previously established principles. Results: Twelve newly stated principles emerged. Effectiveness of a new test can be evaluated by comparison with a proven comparator non-invasive test. The faecal immunochemical test is now considered the appropriate comparator, while colonoscopy remains the diagnostic standard. For a new test to be able to meet differing screening goals and regulatory requirements, flexibility to adjust its positivity threshold is desirable. A rigorous and efficient four-phased approach is proposed, commencing with small studies assessing the test's ability to discriminate between CRC and non-cancer states (phase I), followed by prospective estimation of accuracy across the continuum of neoplastic lesions in neoplasia-enriched populations (phase II). If these show promise, a provisional test positivity threshold is set before evaluation in typical screening populations. Phase III prospective studies determine single round intention-to-screen programme outcomes and confirm the test positivity threshold. Phase IV studies involve evaluation over repeated screening rounds with monitoring for missed lesions. Phases III and IV findings will provide the real-world data required to model test impact on CRC mortality and incidence. Conclusion: New non-invasive tests can be efficiently evaluated by a rigorous phased comparative approach, generating data from unbiased populations that inform predictions of their health impact.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T02:48:30Z
format Journal Article
id ntu-10356/174162
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T02:48:30Z
publishDate 2024
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/1741622024-03-24T15:38:32Z An efficient strategy for evaluating new non-invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer: the guiding principles Bresalier, Robert S. Senore, Carlo Young, Graeme P. Allison, James Benamouzig, Robert Benton, Sally Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. Caro, Luis Carvalho, Beatriz Chiu, Han-Mo Coupé, Veerle M. H. de Klaver, Willemijn de Klerk, Clasine Maria Dekker, Evelien Dolwani, Sunil Fraser, Callum G. Grady, William Guittet, Lydia Gupta, Samir Halloran, Stephen P. Haug, Ulrike Hoff, Geir Itzkowitz, Steven Kortlever, Tim Koulaouzidis, Anastasios Ladabaum, Uri Lauby-Secretan, Beatrice Leja, Mārcis Levin, Bernard Levin, Theodore Robert Macrae, Finlay Meijer, Gerrit A. Melson, Joshua O'Morain, Colm Parry, Susan Rabeneck, Linda Ransohoff, David F. Sáenz, Roque Saito, Hiroshi Sanduleanu-Dascalescu, Silvia Schoen, Robert E. Selby, Kevin Singh, Harminder Steele, Robert J. C. Sung, Joseph Jao Yiu Symonds, Erin Leigh Winawer, Sidney J. Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) Medicine, Health and Life Sciences Colorectal adenomas Colorectal cancer Objective: New screening tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) are rapidly emerging. Conducting trials with mortality reduction as the end point supporting their adoption is challenging. We re-examined the principles underlying evaluation of new non-invasive tests in view of technological developments and identification of new biomarkers. Design: A formal consensus approach involving a multidisciplinary expert panel revised eight previously established principles. Results: Twelve newly stated principles emerged. Effectiveness of a new test can be evaluated by comparison with a proven comparator non-invasive test. The faecal immunochemical test is now considered the appropriate comparator, while colonoscopy remains the diagnostic standard. For a new test to be able to meet differing screening goals and regulatory requirements, flexibility to adjust its positivity threshold is desirable. A rigorous and efficient four-phased approach is proposed, commencing with small studies assessing the test's ability to discriminate between CRC and non-cancer states (phase I), followed by prospective estimation of accuracy across the continuum of neoplastic lesions in neoplasia-enriched populations (phase II). If these show promise, a provisional test positivity threshold is set before evaluation in typical screening populations. Phase III prospective studies determine single round intention-to-screen programme outcomes and confirm the test positivity threshold. Phase IV studies involve evaluation over repeated screening rounds with monitoring for missed lesions. Phases III and IV findings will provide the real-world data required to model test impact on CRC mortality and incidence. Conclusion: New non-invasive tests can be efficiently evaluated by a rigorous phased comparative approach, generating data from unbiased populations that inform predictions of their health impact. Published version 2024-03-18T04:49:45Z 2024-03-18T04:49:45Z 2023 Journal Article Bresalier, R. S., Senore, C., Young, G. P., Allison, J., Benamouzig, R., Benton, S., Bossuyt, P. M. M., Caro, L., Carvalho, B., Chiu, H., Coupé, V. M. H., de Klaver, W., de Klerk, C. M., Dekker, E., Dolwani, S., Fraser, C. G., Grady, W., Guittet, L., Gupta, S., ...Winawer, S. J. (2023). An efficient strategy for evaluating new non-invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer: the guiding principles. Gut, 72(10), 1904-1918. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329701 0017-5749 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/174162 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329701 37463757 2-s2.0-85166413371 10 72 1904 1918 en Gut © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. application/pdf
spellingShingle Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
Colorectal adenomas
Colorectal cancer
Bresalier, Robert S.
Senore, Carlo
Young, Graeme P.
Allison, James
Benamouzig, Robert
Benton, Sally
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
Caro, Luis
Carvalho, Beatriz
Chiu, Han-Mo
Coupé, Veerle M. H.
de Klaver, Willemijn
de Klerk, Clasine Maria
Dekker, Evelien
Dolwani, Sunil
Fraser, Callum G.
Grady, William
Guittet, Lydia
Gupta, Samir
Halloran, Stephen P.
Haug, Ulrike
Hoff, Geir
Itzkowitz, Steven
Kortlever, Tim
Koulaouzidis, Anastasios
Ladabaum, Uri
Lauby-Secretan, Beatrice
Leja, Mārcis
Levin, Bernard
Levin, Theodore Robert
Macrae, Finlay
Meijer, Gerrit A.
Melson, Joshua
O'Morain, Colm
Parry, Susan
Rabeneck, Linda
Ransohoff, David F.
Sáenz, Roque
Saito, Hiroshi
Sanduleanu-Dascalescu, Silvia
Schoen, Robert E.
Selby, Kevin
Singh, Harminder
Steele, Robert J. C.
Sung, Joseph Jao Yiu
Symonds, Erin Leigh
Winawer, Sidney J.
An efficient strategy for evaluating new non-invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer: the guiding principles
title An efficient strategy for evaluating new non-invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer: the guiding principles
title_full An efficient strategy for evaluating new non-invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer: the guiding principles
title_fullStr An efficient strategy for evaluating new non-invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer: the guiding principles
title_full_unstemmed An efficient strategy for evaluating new non-invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer: the guiding principles
title_short An efficient strategy for evaluating new non-invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer: the guiding principles
title_sort efficient strategy for evaluating new non invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer the guiding principles
topic Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
Colorectal adenomas
Colorectal cancer
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/174162
work_keys_str_mv AT bresalierroberts anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT senorecarlo anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT younggraemep anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT allisonjames anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT benamouzigrobert anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT bentonsally anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT bossuytpatrickmm anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT caroluis anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT carvalhobeatriz anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT chiuhanmo anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT coupeveerlemh anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT deklaverwillemijn anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT deklerkclasinemaria anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT dekkerevelien anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT dolwanisunil anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT frasercallumg anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT gradywilliam anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT guittetlydia anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT guptasamir anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT halloranstephenp anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT haugulrike anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT hoffgeir anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT itzkowitzsteven anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT kortlevertim anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT koulaouzidisanastasios anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT ladabaumuri anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT laubysecretanbeatrice anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT lejamarcis anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT levinbernard anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT levintheodorerobert anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT macraefinlay anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT meijergerrita anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT melsonjoshua anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT omoraincolm anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT parrysusan anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT rabenecklinda anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT ransohoffdavidf anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT saenzroque anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT saitohiroshi anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT sanduleanudascalescusilvia anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT schoenroberte anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT selbykevin anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT singhharminder anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT steelerobertjc anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT sungjosephjaoyiu anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT symondserinleigh anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT winawersidneyj anefficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT bresalierroberts efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT senorecarlo efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT younggraemep efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT allisonjames efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT benamouzigrobert efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT bentonsally efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT bossuytpatrickmm efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT caroluis efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT carvalhobeatriz efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT chiuhanmo efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT coupeveerlemh efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT deklaverwillemijn efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT deklerkclasinemaria efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT dekkerevelien efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT dolwanisunil efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT frasercallumg efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT gradywilliam efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT guittetlydia efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT guptasamir efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT halloranstephenp efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT haugulrike efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT hoffgeir efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT itzkowitzsteven efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT kortlevertim efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT koulaouzidisanastasios efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT ladabaumuri efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT laubysecretanbeatrice efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT lejamarcis efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT levinbernard efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT levintheodorerobert efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT macraefinlay efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT meijergerrita efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT melsonjoshua efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT omoraincolm efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT parrysusan efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT rabenecklinda efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT ransohoffdavidf efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT saenzroque efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT saitohiroshi efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT sanduleanudascalescusilvia efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT schoenroberte efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT selbykevin efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT singhharminder efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT steelerobertjc efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT sungjosephjaoyiu efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT symondserinleigh efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples
AT winawersidneyj efficientstrategyforevaluatingnewnoninvasivescreeningtestsforcolorectalcancertheguidingprinciples