A defence of Dworkin's arguments against Hartian legal positivism
Dworkin’s critique against the dominant Hartian position in general jurisprudence has no doubt been greatly influential ever since its appearance. Dworkin’s critique aims mainly at Hart’s separation thesis, namely the thesis that legal reasoning is completely cut off from any moral considerations. D...
Main Author: | Chow, Zhen Yi |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Andrew T. Forcehimes |
Format: | Final Year Project (FYP) |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/174498 |
Similar Items
-
On the lives not worth starting: a defence of the veil argument against the non-identity problem
by: Ang, Wei Xiang
Published: (2023) -
On the incoherence of legal positivism
by: Finnis, J
Published: (2000) -
The ethics of gossiping: an objection against a Kantian account of gossip
by: Ong, Si Ying
Published: (2024) -
Command theory of legal positivism and hukum shar'i : a comparison
by: Ansari, Abdul Haseeb, et al.
Published: (2011) -
‘God loves you’ : in defence of theological statements
by: D'Cruz, Joseph Edwin
Published: (2020)