Who’s being elitist? A debate about the enregisterment of Singlish

This article is a rejoinder to Lee (2023) who makes certain claims about the enregisterment of Singlish via a case study of Spiaking Singlish. In challenging Lee’s key claim that Spiaking Singlish deploys a form of elitist language, I argue that the Singlish features in the book need not demand a so...

Полное описание

Библиографические подробности
Главный автор: Lu, Luke
Другие авторы: School of Humanities
Формат: Journal Article
Язык:English
Опубликовано: 2024
Предметы:
Online-ссылка:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178272
_version_ 1826111286031679488
author Lu, Luke
author2 School of Humanities
author_facet School of Humanities
Lu, Luke
author_sort Lu, Luke
collection NTU
description This article is a rejoinder to Lee (2023) who makes certain claims about the enregisterment of Singlish via a case study of Spiaking Singlish. In challenging Lee’s key claim that Spiaking Singlish deploys a form of elitist language, I argue that the Singlish features in the book need not demand a solely ludic reading and actually draw from everyday practices. Accordingly, enregisterment ought to be understood as a diachronic and evolving process in the vein of Butler’s (1999) notion of sedimentation. Moreover, Lee’s characterization of the ‘monolectal Singlish user’ is classist and reductionist, unsupported by recent research and census data. Consequently, Spiaking Singlish need not be seen as an elitist work, but as contributing to ever-changing attitudes towards Singlish in the public sphere. This article is an alternative iteration to Lee’s (2023) that has implications for the way we understand enregisterment in Singapore and choose to represent it as a process. (Enregisterment, Singlish, Singapore, sociolinguistics, language ideological debates).
first_indexed 2024-10-01T02:48:12Z
format Journal Article
id ntu-10356/178272
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T02:48:12Z
publishDate 2024
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/1782722024-06-15T16:56:37Z Who’s being elitist? A debate about the enregisterment of Singlish Lu, Luke School of Humanities Arts and Humanities Singlish Enregisterment This article is a rejoinder to Lee (2023) who makes certain claims about the enregisterment of Singlish via a case study of Spiaking Singlish. In challenging Lee’s key claim that Spiaking Singlish deploys a form of elitist language, I argue that the Singlish features in the book need not demand a solely ludic reading and actually draw from everyday practices. Accordingly, enregisterment ought to be understood as a diachronic and evolving process in the vein of Butler’s (1999) notion of sedimentation. Moreover, Lee’s characterization of the ‘monolectal Singlish user’ is classist and reductionist, unsupported by recent research and census data. Consequently, Spiaking Singlish need not be seen as an elitist work, but as contributing to ever-changing attitudes towards Singlish in the public sphere. This article is an alternative iteration to Lee’s (2023) that has implications for the way we understand enregisterment in Singapore and choose to represent it as a process. (Enregisterment, Singlish, Singapore, sociolinguistics, language ideological debates). Published version 2024-06-10T05:13:15Z 2024-06-10T05:13:15Z 2024 Journal Article Lu, L. (2024). Who’s being elitist? A debate about the enregisterment of Singlish. Language in Society, 1-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404524000162 0047-4045 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178272 10.1017/S0047404524000162 2-s2.0-85187700443 1 23 en Language in Society © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. application/pdf
spellingShingle Arts and Humanities
Singlish
Enregisterment
Lu, Luke
Who’s being elitist? A debate about the enregisterment of Singlish
title Who’s being elitist? A debate about the enregisterment of Singlish
title_full Who’s being elitist? A debate about the enregisterment of Singlish
title_fullStr Who’s being elitist? A debate about the enregisterment of Singlish
title_full_unstemmed Who’s being elitist? A debate about the enregisterment of Singlish
title_short Who’s being elitist? A debate about the enregisterment of Singlish
title_sort who s being elitist a debate about the enregisterment of singlish
topic Arts and Humanities
Singlish
Enregisterment
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178272
work_keys_str_mv AT luluke whosbeingelitistadebateabouttheenregistermentofsinglish