Crop and landscape heterogeneity increase biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a global review and meta-analysis
Agricultural intensification not only increases food production but also drives widespread biodiversity decline. Increasing landscape heterogeneity has been suggested to increase biodiversity across habitats, while increasing crop heterogeneity may support biodiversity within agroecosystems. These s...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178562 |
_version_ | 1811680952503500800 |
---|---|
author | Priyadarshana, Tharaka S. Martin, Emily A. Sirami, Clélia Woodcock, Ben A. Goodale, Eben Martínez‐Núñez, Carlos Lee, Myung-Bok Pagani‐Núñez, Emilio Raderschall, Chloé A. Brotons, Lluís Rege, Anushka Ouin, Annie Tscharntke, Teja Slade, Eleanor M. |
author2 | Asian School of the Environment |
author_facet | Asian School of the Environment Priyadarshana, Tharaka S. Martin, Emily A. Sirami, Clélia Woodcock, Ben A. Goodale, Eben Martínez‐Núñez, Carlos Lee, Myung-Bok Pagani‐Núñez, Emilio Raderschall, Chloé A. Brotons, Lluís Rege, Anushka Ouin, Annie Tscharntke, Teja Slade, Eleanor M. |
author_sort | Priyadarshana, Tharaka S. |
collection | NTU |
description | Agricultural intensification not only increases food production but also drives widespread biodiversity decline. Increasing landscape heterogeneity has been suggested to increase biodiversity across habitats, while increasing crop heterogeneity may support biodiversity within agroecosystems. These spatial heterogeneity effects can be partitioned into compositional (land-cover type diversity) and configurational heterogeneity (land-cover type arrangement), measured either for the crop mosaic or across the landscape for both crops and semi-natural habitats. However, studies have reported mixed responses of biodiversity to increases in these heterogeneity components across taxa and contexts. Our meta-analysis covering 6397 fields across 122 studies conducted in Asia, Europe, North and South America reveals consistently positive effects of crop and landscape heterogeneity, as well as compositional and configurational heterogeneity for plant, invertebrate, vertebrate, pollinator and predator biodiversity. Vertebrates and plants benefit more from landscape heterogeneity, while invertebrates derive similar benefits from both crop and landscape heterogeneity. Pollinators benefit more from configurational heterogeneity, but predators favour compositional heterogeneity. These positive effects are consistent for invertebrates and vertebrates in both tropical/subtropical and temperate agroecosystems, and in annual and perennial cropping systems, and at small to large spatial scales. Our results suggest that promoting increased landscape heterogeneity by diversifying crops and semi-natural habitats, as suggested in the current UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, is key for restoring biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. |
first_indexed | 2024-10-01T03:33:13Z |
format | Journal Article |
id | ntu-10356/178562 |
institution | Nanyang Technological University |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-10-01T03:33:13Z |
publishDate | 2024 |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | ntu-10356/1785622024-07-01T15:30:38Z Crop and landscape heterogeneity increase biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a global review and meta-analysis Priyadarshana, Tharaka S. Martin, Emily A. Sirami, Clélia Woodcock, Ben A. Goodale, Eben Martínez‐Núñez, Carlos Lee, Myung-Bok Pagani‐Núñez, Emilio Raderschall, Chloé A. Brotons, Lluís Rege, Anushka Ouin, Annie Tscharntke, Teja Slade, Eleanor M. Asian School of the Environment Agricultural Sciences Agroecology Biodiversity-friendly farming Agricultural intensification not only increases food production but also drives widespread biodiversity decline. Increasing landscape heterogeneity has been suggested to increase biodiversity across habitats, while increasing crop heterogeneity may support biodiversity within agroecosystems. These spatial heterogeneity effects can be partitioned into compositional (land-cover type diversity) and configurational heterogeneity (land-cover type arrangement), measured either for the crop mosaic or across the landscape for both crops and semi-natural habitats. However, studies have reported mixed responses of biodiversity to increases in these heterogeneity components across taxa and contexts. Our meta-analysis covering 6397 fields across 122 studies conducted in Asia, Europe, North and South America reveals consistently positive effects of crop and landscape heterogeneity, as well as compositional and configurational heterogeneity for plant, invertebrate, vertebrate, pollinator and predator biodiversity. Vertebrates and plants benefit more from landscape heterogeneity, while invertebrates derive similar benefits from both crop and landscape heterogeneity. Pollinators benefit more from configurational heterogeneity, but predators favour compositional heterogeneity. These positive effects are consistent for invertebrates and vertebrates in both tropical/subtropical and temperate agroecosystems, and in annual and perennial cropping systems, and at small to large spatial scales. Our results suggest that promoting increased landscape heterogeneity by diversifying crops and semi-natural habitats, as suggested in the current UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, is key for restoring biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ministry of Education (MOE) Nanyang Technological University Submitted/Accepted version T.S.P. was supported by a research scholarshiop under E.M.S. at the Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (Application No: R2004096). E.M.S. is supported by an MOE AcRF Tier 1 grant (Grant No: RG119/10). B.W. is supported by NERC NE/W005050/1 (AgZero+), NE/V007548/1 (GLiTRS), and NE/V006525/1 (RestREco). E.G. appreciates the Special Talents Recruitment Fund of Guangxi University, China, for support of work on crop heterogeneity. 2024-06-26T07:21:00Z 2024-06-26T07:21:00Z 2024 Journal Article Priyadarshana, T. S., Martin, E. A., Sirami, C., Woodcock, B. A., Goodale, E., Martínez‐Núñez, C., Lee, M., Pagani‐Núñez, E., Raderschall, C. A., Brotons, L., Rege, A., Ouin, A., Tscharntke, T. & Slade, E. M. (2024). Crop and landscape heterogeneity increase biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a global review and meta-analysis. Ecology Letters, 27(3), e14412-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.14412 0012-9658 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178562 10.1111/ele.14412 3 27 e14412 en RG119/19 R2004096 Ecology Letters 10.21979/N9/63PIP0 © 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All rights reserved. This article may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the copyright holder. The Version of Record is available online at http://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14412. application/pdf |
spellingShingle | Agricultural Sciences Agroecology Biodiversity-friendly farming Priyadarshana, Tharaka S. Martin, Emily A. Sirami, Clélia Woodcock, Ben A. Goodale, Eben Martínez‐Núñez, Carlos Lee, Myung-Bok Pagani‐Núñez, Emilio Raderschall, Chloé A. Brotons, Lluís Rege, Anushka Ouin, Annie Tscharntke, Teja Slade, Eleanor M. Crop and landscape heterogeneity increase biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a global review and meta-analysis |
title | Crop and landscape heterogeneity increase biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a global review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Crop and landscape heterogeneity increase biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a global review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Crop and landscape heterogeneity increase biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a global review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Crop and landscape heterogeneity increase biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a global review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Crop and landscape heterogeneity increase biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a global review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | crop and landscape heterogeneity increase biodiversity in agricultural landscapes a global review and meta analysis |
topic | Agricultural Sciences Agroecology Biodiversity-friendly farming |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178562 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT priyadarshanatharakas cropandlandscapeheterogeneityincreasebiodiversityinagriculturallandscapesaglobalreviewandmetaanalysis AT martinemilya cropandlandscapeheterogeneityincreasebiodiversityinagriculturallandscapesaglobalreviewandmetaanalysis AT siramiclelia cropandlandscapeheterogeneityincreasebiodiversityinagriculturallandscapesaglobalreviewandmetaanalysis AT woodcockbena cropandlandscapeheterogeneityincreasebiodiversityinagriculturallandscapesaglobalreviewandmetaanalysis AT goodaleeben cropandlandscapeheterogeneityincreasebiodiversityinagriculturallandscapesaglobalreviewandmetaanalysis AT martineznunezcarlos cropandlandscapeheterogeneityincreasebiodiversityinagriculturallandscapesaglobalreviewandmetaanalysis AT leemyungbok cropandlandscapeheterogeneityincreasebiodiversityinagriculturallandscapesaglobalreviewandmetaanalysis AT paganinunezemilio cropandlandscapeheterogeneityincreasebiodiversityinagriculturallandscapesaglobalreviewandmetaanalysis AT raderschallchloea cropandlandscapeheterogeneityincreasebiodiversityinagriculturallandscapesaglobalreviewandmetaanalysis AT brotonslluis cropandlandscapeheterogeneityincreasebiodiversityinagriculturallandscapesaglobalreviewandmetaanalysis AT regeanushka cropandlandscapeheterogeneityincreasebiodiversityinagriculturallandscapesaglobalreviewandmetaanalysis AT ouinannie cropandlandscapeheterogeneityincreasebiodiversityinagriculturallandscapesaglobalreviewandmetaanalysis AT tscharntketeja cropandlandscapeheterogeneityincreasebiodiversityinagriculturallandscapesaglobalreviewandmetaanalysis AT sladeeleanorm cropandlandscapeheterogeneityincreasebiodiversityinagriculturallandscapesaglobalreviewandmetaanalysis |