Multi-objective optimization for forming quality of laser and CMT-P arc hybrid additive manufacturing aluminum alloy using response surface methodology
A thin-walled structure of high-strength aluminum alloy 2024 (AA2024) was fabricated using novel laser and cold metal transfer and pulse (CMT-P) arc hybrid additive manufacturing (LCAHAM) technology. The influence of the wire feeding speed, scanning speed, and laser power on the forming quality was...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178635 |
_version_ | 1826120125263118336 |
---|---|
author | He, Shiwei Zhang, Zhiqiang Li, Hanxi Zhang, Tiangang Lu, Xuecheng Kang, Jiajie |
author2 | School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering |
author_facet | School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering He, Shiwei Zhang, Zhiqiang Li, Hanxi Zhang, Tiangang Lu, Xuecheng Kang, Jiajie |
author_sort | He, Shiwei |
collection | NTU |
description | A thin-walled structure of high-strength aluminum alloy 2024 (AA2024) was fabricated using novel laser and cold metal transfer and pulse (CMT-P) arc hybrid additive manufacturing (LCAHAM) technology. The influence of the wire feeding speed, scanning speed, and laser power on the forming quality was systematically studied by the response surface methodology, probability statistical theory, and multi-objective optimization algorithm. The result showed that the forming accuracy was significantly more affected by the laser power than by the wire feeding speed and scanning speed. Specifically, there was an obvious correlation between the interaction of the laser power and wire feeding speed and the resulting formation accuracy of LCAHAM AA2024. Moreover, the laser power, wire feeding speed, and scanning speed all had noticeable effects on the spattering degree during the LCAHAM AA2024 process, with the influence of the laser power surpassing that of the other two factors. Importantly, these three factors demonstrated minimal mutual interaction on spattering. Furthermore, the scanning speed emerged as the most significant factor influencing porosity compared to the wire feeding speed and laser power. It was crucial to highlight that the combined effects of the wire feed speed and laser power played an obvious role in reducing porosity. Considering the forming accuracy, spattering degree, and porosity collectively, the recommended process parameters were as follows: a wire feeding speed ranging from 4.2 to 4.3 m/min, a scanning speed between 15 and 17 mm/s, and a laser power set at approximately 2000 W, where the forming accuracy was 84–85%, the spattering degree fell within 1.0–1.2%, and the porosity was 0.7–0.9%. |
first_indexed | 2024-10-01T05:11:23Z |
format | Journal Article |
id | ntu-10356/178635 |
institution | Nanyang Technological University |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-10-01T05:11:23Z |
publishDate | 2024 |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | ntu-10356/1786352024-07-06T16:47:59Z Multi-objective optimization for forming quality of laser and CMT-P arc hybrid additive manufacturing aluminum alloy using response surface methodology He, Shiwei Zhang, Zhiqiang Li, Hanxi Zhang, Tiangang Lu, Xuecheng Kang, Jiajie School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Engineering Laser–arc hybrid additive manufacturing High-strength aluminum alloy A thin-walled structure of high-strength aluminum alloy 2024 (AA2024) was fabricated using novel laser and cold metal transfer and pulse (CMT-P) arc hybrid additive manufacturing (LCAHAM) technology. The influence of the wire feeding speed, scanning speed, and laser power on the forming quality was systematically studied by the response surface methodology, probability statistical theory, and multi-objective optimization algorithm. The result showed that the forming accuracy was significantly more affected by the laser power than by the wire feeding speed and scanning speed. Specifically, there was an obvious correlation between the interaction of the laser power and wire feeding speed and the resulting formation accuracy of LCAHAM AA2024. Moreover, the laser power, wire feeding speed, and scanning speed all had noticeable effects on the spattering degree during the LCAHAM AA2024 process, with the influence of the laser power surpassing that of the other two factors. Importantly, these three factors demonstrated minimal mutual interaction on spattering. Furthermore, the scanning speed emerged as the most significant factor influencing porosity compared to the wire feeding speed and laser power. It was crucial to highlight that the combined effects of the wire feed speed and laser power played an obvious role in reducing porosity. Considering the forming accuracy, spattering degree, and porosity collectively, the recommended process parameters were as follows: a wire feeding speed ranging from 4.2 to 4.3 m/min, a scanning speed between 15 and 17 mm/s, and a laser power set at approximately 2000 W, where the forming accuracy was 84–85%, the spattering degree fell within 1.0–1.2%, and the porosity was 0.7–0.9%. Published version This work was supported by the Aeronautical Science Foundation of China [Grant Number 2020Z049067002], Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City [Grant Number 22JCYBJC01280] and National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant Number 51905536]. 2024-07-02T02:03:00Z 2024-07-02T02:03:00Z 2024 Journal Article He, S., Zhang, Z., Li, H., Zhang, T., Lu, X. & Kang, J. (2024). Multi-objective optimization for forming quality of laser and CMT-P arc hybrid additive manufacturing aluminum alloy using response surface methodology. Actuators, 13(1), 23-. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/act13010023 2076-0825 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178635 10.3390/act13010023 2-s2.0-85183176598 1 13 23 en Actuators © 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). application/pdf |
spellingShingle | Engineering Laser–arc hybrid additive manufacturing High-strength aluminum alloy He, Shiwei Zhang, Zhiqiang Li, Hanxi Zhang, Tiangang Lu, Xuecheng Kang, Jiajie Multi-objective optimization for forming quality of laser and CMT-P arc hybrid additive manufacturing aluminum alloy using response surface methodology |
title | Multi-objective optimization for forming quality of laser and CMT-P arc hybrid additive manufacturing aluminum alloy using response surface methodology |
title_full | Multi-objective optimization for forming quality of laser and CMT-P arc hybrid additive manufacturing aluminum alloy using response surface methodology |
title_fullStr | Multi-objective optimization for forming quality of laser and CMT-P arc hybrid additive manufacturing aluminum alloy using response surface methodology |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi-objective optimization for forming quality of laser and CMT-P arc hybrid additive manufacturing aluminum alloy using response surface methodology |
title_short | Multi-objective optimization for forming quality of laser and CMT-P arc hybrid additive manufacturing aluminum alloy using response surface methodology |
title_sort | multi objective optimization for forming quality of laser and cmt p arc hybrid additive manufacturing aluminum alloy using response surface methodology |
topic | Engineering Laser–arc hybrid additive manufacturing High-strength aluminum alloy |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178635 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heshiwei multiobjectiveoptimizationforformingqualityoflaserandcmtparchybridadditivemanufacturingaluminumalloyusingresponsesurfacemethodology AT zhangzhiqiang multiobjectiveoptimizationforformingqualityoflaserandcmtparchybridadditivemanufacturingaluminumalloyusingresponsesurfacemethodology AT lihanxi multiobjectiveoptimizationforformingqualityoflaserandcmtparchybridadditivemanufacturingaluminumalloyusingresponsesurfacemethodology AT zhangtiangang multiobjectiveoptimizationforformingqualityoflaserandcmtparchybridadditivemanufacturingaluminumalloyusingresponsesurfacemethodology AT luxuecheng multiobjectiveoptimizationforformingqualityoflaserandcmtparchybridadditivemanufacturingaluminumalloyusingresponsesurfacemethodology AT kangjiajie multiobjectiveoptimizationforformingqualityoflaserandcmtparchybridadditivemanufacturingaluminumalloyusingresponsesurfacemethodology |