Some comments on Benedict's "Miao-Yao enigma: the Na-e language"
Up to now we have thought that the Hmong-Mien (Miao-Yao) family comprised three branches: Hmongic (Miao and Bunu Yao), Ho Nte (She) & Mienic (Yao proper). Now Benedict has presented evidence for a possible fourth branch: Na-e. Benedict's remarks have inspired me to review the current classi...
Main Author: | Strecker, David |
---|---|
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178917 |
Similar Items
-
Some comments on Benedict's "Miao-Yao enigma": addendum
by: Strecker, David
Published: (2024) -
Miao-Yao enigma: the Na-e language
by: Benedict, Paul K.
Published: (2024) -
Some evidence from Biao Min on the initials of Proto-Mienic (Yao) and Proto-Hmong-Mien (Miao-Yao)
by: Solnit, David B.
Published: (2024) -
Review of "Les Langues Hmong-Mjen (Miao-Yao): phonologie historique"
by: Mortensen, David
Published: (2024) -
Comment on Matisoff's comparison between Greenberg and Benedict
by: Benedict, Paul K.
Published: (2024)