“It's purely mutual respect”: cross-cultural taboos and the everyday reproduction of Singaporean nationalism

While differences often threaten ethnonationalist projects, the Singaporean state has rendered a particular configuration of racial-religious diversity constitutive of nationalism in the city-state. In this paper, we approach nationalism through an often-overlooked avenue: intangible heritage such a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kathiravelu, Laavanya, Pandian, Sharad
Other Authors: School of Social Sciences
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178948
_version_ 1824455078994509824
author Kathiravelu, Laavanya
Pandian, Sharad
author2 School of Social Sciences
author_facet School of Social Sciences
Kathiravelu, Laavanya
Pandian, Sharad
author_sort Kathiravelu, Laavanya
collection NTU
description While differences often threaten ethnonationalist projects, the Singaporean state has rendered a particular configuration of racial-religious diversity constitutive of nationalism in the city-state. In this paper, we approach nationalism through an often-overlooked avenue: intangible heritage such as everyday myths, customs, and taboos. A total of 150 interviews were conducted in three neighbourhoods in Singapore, where guided conversations were conducted regarding common customs, myths, and taboos in individuals’ families and communities. We found that respondents imagined their (state-designated) racial-religious groups as communities of shared customs, while also demonstrating familiarity, even deference, to the customs of other groups. However, this intimacy with other groups’ practices did not undermine the integrity of respondents’ own group identity, since they remained committed to their cultural practices as embodying ancient and useful – even “scientific” – knowledge. The data thus showed that citizens are deeply reflexive about the nature, origins, and justification of the practices they undertake. This domain of everyday practices was neither simply defined into being by the state, nor is it some heroic realm of defiance: instead, it is one where people display creativity and agency in making sense of cherished cultural similarities and differences, all while using state-prescribed categories as resources for their meaning-making.
first_indexed 2025-02-19T03:32:30Z
format Journal Article
id ntu-10356/178948
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2025-02-19T03:32:30Z
publishDate 2024
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/1789482024-07-11T08:23:43Z “It's purely mutual respect”: cross-cultural taboos and the everyday reproduction of Singaporean nationalism Kathiravelu, Laavanya Pandian, Sharad School of Social Sciences Social Sciences Singapore Ethnicity While differences often threaten ethnonationalist projects, the Singaporean state has rendered a particular configuration of racial-religious diversity constitutive of nationalism in the city-state. In this paper, we approach nationalism through an often-overlooked avenue: intangible heritage such as everyday myths, customs, and taboos. A total of 150 interviews were conducted in three neighbourhoods in Singapore, where guided conversations were conducted regarding common customs, myths, and taboos in individuals’ families and communities. We found that respondents imagined their (state-designated) racial-religious groups as communities of shared customs, while also demonstrating familiarity, even deference, to the customs of other groups. However, this intimacy with other groups’ practices did not undermine the integrity of respondents’ own group identity, since they remained committed to their cultural practices as embodying ancient and useful – even “scientific” – knowledge. The data thus showed that citizens are deeply reflexive about the nature, origins, and justification of the practices they undertake. This domain of everyday practices was neither simply defined into being by the state, nor is it some heroic realm of defiance: instead, it is one where people display creativity and agency in making sense of cherished cultural similarities and differences, all while using state-prescribed categories as resources for their meaning-making. National Heritage Board This research was enabled by a Heritage Research grant (HRG) entitled “Designing Cultures”. 2024-07-11T08:22:54Z 2024-07-11T08:22:54Z 2024 Journal Article Kathiravelu, L. & Pandian, S. (2024). “It's purely mutual respect”: cross-cultural taboos and the everyday reproduction of Singaporean nationalism. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sena.12416 1473-8481 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178948 10.1111/sena.12416 2-s2.0-85189088499 en HRG Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism © 2024 Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Social Sciences
Singapore
Ethnicity
Kathiravelu, Laavanya
Pandian, Sharad
“It's purely mutual respect”: cross-cultural taboos and the everyday reproduction of Singaporean nationalism
title “It's purely mutual respect”: cross-cultural taboos and the everyday reproduction of Singaporean nationalism
title_full “It's purely mutual respect”: cross-cultural taboos and the everyday reproduction of Singaporean nationalism
title_fullStr “It's purely mutual respect”: cross-cultural taboos and the everyday reproduction of Singaporean nationalism
title_full_unstemmed “It's purely mutual respect”: cross-cultural taboos and the everyday reproduction of Singaporean nationalism
title_short “It's purely mutual respect”: cross-cultural taboos and the everyday reproduction of Singaporean nationalism
title_sort it s purely mutual respect cross cultural taboos and the everyday reproduction of singaporean nationalism
topic Social Sciences
Singapore
Ethnicity
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178948
work_keys_str_mv AT kathiravelulaavanya itspurelymutualrespectcrossculturaltaboosandtheeverydayreproductionofsingaporeannationalism
AT pandiansharad itspurelymutualrespectcrossculturaltaboosandtheeverydayreproductionofsingaporeannationalism