On the evolution of the Kham agreement paradigm

Recent studies of the agreement systems of the "prono-minalizing" Tibeto-Burman languages (Bauman 1974, 1975, 1979, DeLancey 1980, 1981a, 1983, Caughley 1982, Thurgood 1985) have established that the suffixed "pronominal" verb agreement paradigm, once considered to be a late seco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: DeLancey, Scott
Other Authors: University of Oregon
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179168
_version_ 1826130405615468544
author DeLancey, Scott
author2 University of Oregon
author_facet University of Oregon
DeLancey, Scott
author_sort DeLancey, Scott
collection NTU
description Recent studies of the agreement systems of the "prono-minalizing" Tibeto-Burman languages (Bauman 1974, 1975, 1979, DeLancey 1980, 1981a, 1983, Caughley 1982, Thurgood 1985) have established that the suffixed "pronominal" verb agreement paradigm, once considered to be a late secondary development in a few western branches of the family, is in fact widespread throughout the TB languages, and traceable to the Proto-Tibeto-Burman level.2 There is no reasonable doubt that most of the agreement paradigms found in the family represent com¬mon inheritance -- often, to be sure, with considerable reana¬lysis and secondary alteration -- of an original paradigm in which the ST pronominal roots *na '1st person' and *na(n) '2nd person' were suffixed to the verb in a split ergative pattern. (See DeLancey 1981b for a discussion of the notion of split ergativity and its relevance to some of the data discussed here).
first_indexed 2024-10-01T07:55:57Z
format Journal Article
id ntu-10356/179168
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T07:55:57Z
publishDate 2024
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/1791682024-07-23T06:51:52Z On the evolution of the Kham agreement paradigm DeLancey, Scott University of Oregon Arts and Humanities Recent studies of the agreement systems of the "prono-minalizing" Tibeto-Burman languages (Bauman 1974, 1975, 1979, DeLancey 1980, 1981a, 1983, Caughley 1982, Thurgood 1985) have established that the suffixed "pronominal" verb agreement paradigm, once considered to be a late secondary development in a few western branches of the family, is in fact widespread throughout the TB languages, and traceable to the Proto-Tibeto-Burman level.2 There is no reasonable doubt that most of the agreement paradigms found in the family represent com¬mon inheritance -- often, to be sure, with considerable reana¬lysis and secondary alteration -- of an original paradigm in which the ST pronominal roots *na '1st person' and *na(n) '2nd person' were suffixed to the verb in a split ergative pattern. (See DeLancey 1981b for a discussion of the notion of split ergativity and its relevance to some of the data discussed here). Published version 2024-07-23T06:51:52Z 2024-07-23T06:51:52Z 1988 Journal Article DeLancey, S. (1988). On the evolution of the Kham agreement paradigm. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 11(2), 51-61. https://dx.doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.11.2.04 0731-3500 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179168 10.32655/LTBA.11.2.04 2 11 51 61 en Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area © 1988 The Editor(s). All rights reserved. application/pdf
spellingShingle Arts and Humanities
DeLancey, Scott
On the evolution of the Kham agreement paradigm
title On the evolution of the Kham agreement paradigm
title_full On the evolution of the Kham agreement paradigm
title_fullStr On the evolution of the Kham agreement paradigm
title_full_unstemmed On the evolution of the Kham agreement paradigm
title_short On the evolution of the Kham agreement paradigm
title_sort on the evolution of the kham agreement paradigm
topic Arts and Humanities
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179168
work_keys_str_mv AT delanceyscott ontheevolutionofthekhamagreementparadigm