Discussion note: reply to James A. Matisoff's "A key etymology"
In LTBA 15.1 (1992:139-143) 'A key etymology, James A. Matisoff investigated the etymology of Thai kuncee, Malay kuntji 'lock - key'. After stating that there is no plausible Austronesian etymology for the Malay word, that the source of Thai kuncee and Malay kuntji is not to be traced...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179355 |
| _version_ | 1811695562977705984 |
|---|---|
| author | Sagart, Laurent |
| author2 | Centre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l'Asie Orientale |
| author_facet | Centre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l'Asie Orientale Sagart, Laurent |
| author_sort | Sagart, Laurent |
| collection | NTU |
| description | In LTBA 15.1 (1992:139-143) 'A key etymology, James A. Matisoff investigated the etymology of Thai kuncee, Malay kuntji 'lock - key'. After stating that there is no plausible Austronesian etymology for the Malay word, that the source of Thai kuncee and Malay kuntji is not to be traced to Chinese, and that a reasonable etymology cannot be found in Sanskrit/Pali or in Khmer either (pp. 139-140), he proposed for these two words a Romance origin in the word-family of Lat. dineus 'wedge', dineare 'secure with wedges'. In his view, an extra-Asiatic etymology is indicated by the "'technological' semantic content of these words" (p. 140). According to him, the terms were introduced by the crews of Portuguese ships in the 16th and 17th centuries. The Portuguese word for 'key', however, is chave, which obviously will not do as a source for the Malay and Thai words, as Matisoff acknowledges: he offers no solution, but observes (p. 142) that "it would be interesting to find out about the ethnic mix of the crews of Portuguese vessels in the 16th century". |
| first_indexed | 2024-10-01T07:25:27Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | ntu-10356/179355 |
| institution | Nanyang Technological University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-10-01T07:25:27Z |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | ntu-10356/1793552024-07-29T08:50:16Z Discussion note: reply to James A. Matisoff's "A key etymology" Sagart, Laurent Centre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l'Asie Orientale Arts and Humanities In LTBA 15.1 (1992:139-143) 'A key etymology, James A. Matisoff investigated the etymology of Thai kuncee, Malay kuntji 'lock - key'. After stating that there is no plausible Austronesian etymology for the Malay word, that the source of Thai kuncee and Malay kuntji is not to be traced to Chinese, and that a reasonable etymology cannot be found in Sanskrit/Pali or in Khmer either (pp. 139-140), he proposed for these two words a Romance origin in the word-family of Lat. dineus 'wedge', dineare 'secure with wedges'. In his view, an extra-Asiatic etymology is indicated by the "'technological' semantic content of these words" (p. 140). According to him, the terms were introduced by the crews of Portuguese ships in the 16th and 17th centuries. The Portuguese word for 'key', however, is chave, which obviously will not do as a source for the Malay and Thai words, as Matisoff acknowledges: he offers no solution, but observes (p. 142) that "it would be interesting to find out about the ethnic mix of the crews of Portuguese vessels in the 16th century". Published version 2024-07-29T08:50:16Z 2024-07-29T08:50:16Z 1994 Journal Article Sagart, L. (1994). Discussion note: reply to James A. Matisoff's "A key etymology". Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 17(1), 167-168. https://dx.doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.17.1.08 0731-3500 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179355 10.32655/LTBA.17.1.08 1 17 167 168 en Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area © 1994 The Editor(s). All rights reserved. application/pdf |
| spellingShingle | Arts and Humanities Sagart, Laurent Discussion note: reply to James A. Matisoff's "A key etymology" |
| title | Discussion note: reply to James A. Matisoff's "A key etymology" |
| title_full | Discussion note: reply to James A. Matisoff's "A key etymology" |
| title_fullStr | Discussion note: reply to James A. Matisoff's "A key etymology" |
| title_full_unstemmed | Discussion note: reply to James A. Matisoff's "A key etymology" |
| title_short | Discussion note: reply to James A. Matisoff's "A key etymology" |
| title_sort | discussion note reply to james a matisoff s a key etymology |
| topic | Arts and Humanities |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179355 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sagartlaurent discussionnotereplytojamesamatisoffsakeyetymology |