Greenberg and I: the case of Southeast Asian vulva

In a recent (1990) note on megalocomparison James A. Matisoff (hereafter JAM) compared the approach of Joseph Greenberg (hereafter JG) to my own. I thought that I came out rather well, on the whole, but I also felt that the note failed to capture the essential difference between the two approaches....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Benedict, Paul K.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179359
_version_ 1826118885109137408
author Benedict, Paul K.
author_facet Benedict, Paul K.
author_sort Benedict, Paul K.
collection NTU
description In a recent (1990) note on megalocomparison James A. Matisoff (hereafter JAM) compared the approach of Joseph Greenberg (hereafter JG) to my own. I thought that I came out rather well, on the whole, but I also felt that the note failed to capture the essential difference between the two approaches. At times an example is worth a thousand words and this is one of those occasions. Robert Bauer (1991) has recently reviewed the Sino-Tibetan and other Southeast Asian terms for vulva, avowedly making use of the JG approach, 'I have combined Greenberg's multilateral comparison... "a method that looks at everything at once... at many languages across a few words" (Greenberg 1987:23), with Buck's technique of sorting modern forms by their Indo-European etyma...' (pp.147-48). He makes extensive use of my reconstructions in both the ST and AT fields, but ends up by setting up PST *dzu(k) mat > P-Chinese *1st mat > Austro-Tai *tupi, the latter as the product of early diffusion in the region.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T04:50:51Z
format Journal Article
id ntu-10356/179359
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T04:50:51Z
publishDate 2024
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/1793592024-07-30T06:06:26Z Greenberg and I: the case of Southeast Asian vulva Benedict, Paul K. Arts and Humanities In a recent (1990) note on megalocomparison James A. Matisoff (hereafter JAM) compared the approach of Joseph Greenberg (hereafter JG) to my own. I thought that I came out rather well, on the whole, but I also felt that the note failed to capture the essential difference between the two approaches. At times an example is worth a thousand words and this is one of those occasions. Robert Bauer (1991) has recently reviewed the Sino-Tibetan and other Southeast Asian terms for vulva, avowedly making use of the JG approach, 'I have combined Greenberg's multilateral comparison... "a method that looks at everything at once... at many languages across a few words" (Greenberg 1987:23), with Buck's technique of sorting modern forms by their Indo-European etyma...' (pp.147-48). He makes extensive use of my reconstructions in both the ST and AT fields, but ends up by setting up PST *dzu(k) mat > P-Chinese *1st mat > Austro-Tai *tupi, the latter as the product of early diffusion in the region. Published version 2024-07-30T06:06:26Z 2024-07-30T06:06:26Z 1994 Journal Article Benedict, P. K. (1994). Greenberg and I: the case of Southeast Asian vulva. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 17(1), 177-178. https://dx.doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.17.1.12 0731-3500 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179359 10.32655/LTBA.17.1.12 1 17 177 178 en Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area © 1994 The Editor(s). All rights reserved. application/pdf
spellingShingle Arts and Humanities
Benedict, Paul K.
Greenberg and I: the case of Southeast Asian vulva
title Greenberg and I: the case of Southeast Asian vulva
title_full Greenberg and I: the case of Southeast Asian vulva
title_fullStr Greenberg and I: the case of Southeast Asian vulva
title_full_unstemmed Greenberg and I: the case of Southeast Asian vulva
title_short Greenberg and I: the case of Southeast Asian vulva
title_sort greenberg and i the case of southeast asian vulva
topic Arts and Humanities
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179359
work_keys_str_mv AT benedictpaulk greenbergandithecaseofsoutheastasianvulva