The effects of preparer's justification on reviewer's judgment.

Notwithstanding the importance of the quality assurance role of the review process (Solomon 1987, Abdel-Khalik and Solomon 1989, AICPA 1992, AU311.13), to date, audit research offers little insight into the impact of the review process on the reviewer's cognition and decision (Libby and Trotman...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yip Ow, Siew Wah.
Other Authors: Tan, Hun Tong
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/20254
_version_ 1824453612936364032
author Yip Ow, Siew Wah.
author2 Tan, Hun Tong
author_facet Tan, Hun Tong
Yip Ow, Siew Wah.
author_sort Yip Ow, Siew Wah.
collection NTU
description Notwithstanding the importance of the quality assurance role of the review process (Solomon 1987, Abdel-Khalik and Solomon 1989, AICPA 1992, AU311.13), to date, audit research offers little insight into the impact of the review process on the reviewer's cognition and decision (Libby and Trotman 1993; Rich, Solomon and Trotman 1994). In particular, little is known about how contextual variations affect the effectiveness of the review process (Rich, Solomon and Trotman 1994; Asare and McDaniel 1996). This dissertation seeks to extend current research by investigating the effect of a contextual feature of the review process, namely the preparer's justification memo, on reviewer's likelihood assessment.
first_indexed 2025-02-19T03:09:12Z
format Thesis
id ntu-10356/20254
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2025-02-19T03:09:12Z
publishDate 2009
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/202542024-01-12T10:30:10Z The effects of preparer's justification on reviewer's judgment. Yip Ow, Siew Wah. Tan, Hun Tong Nanyang Business School DRNTU::Business::Auditing Notwithstanding the importance of the quality assurance role of the review process (Solomon 1987, Abdel-Khalik and Solomon 1989, AICPA 1992, AU311.13), to date, audit research offers little insight into the impact of the review process on the reviewer's cognition and decision (Libby and Trotman 1993; Rich, Solomon and Trotman 1994). In particular, little is known about how contextual variations affect the effectiveness of the review process (Rich, Solomon and Trotman 1994; Asare and McDaniel 1996). This dissertation seeks to extend current research by investigating the effect of a contextual feature of the review process, namely the preparer's justification memo, on reviewer's likelihood assessment. Doctor of Philosophy (NBS) 2009-12-14T09:13:23Z 2009-12-14T09:13:23Z 1997 1997 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10356/20254 en NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 106 p. application/pdf
spellingShingle DRNTU::Business::Auditing
Yip Ow, Siew Wah.
The effects of preparer's justification on reviewer's judgment.
title The effects of preparer's justification on reviewer's judgment.
title_full The effects of preparer's justification on reviewer's judgment.
title_fullStr The effects of preparer's justification on reviewer's judgment.
title_full_unstemmed The effects of preparer's justification on reviewer's judgment.
title_short The effects of preparer's justification on reviewer's judgment.
title_sort effects of preparer s justification on reviewer s judgment
topic DRNTU::Business::Auditing
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/20254
work_keys_str_mv AT yipowsiewwah theeffectsofpreparersjustificationonreviewersjudgment
AT yipowsiewwah effectsofpreparersjustificationonreviewersjudgment