Online reviews : is longer really better?

The first thing that comes to mind when one considers the term ‘online consumer review’ is the number of stars. However, are there any other components of a review that affect our attitudes towards the product? The purpose of this study is to determine if and how the length of these reviews affects...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lio, Zhi Sen, Yang, Sherman Junjie, Tan, Daryl Hsien Yong
Other Authors: Robert Kreuzbauer
Format: Final Year Project (FYP)
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/48117
_version_ 1826119177743630336
author Lio, Zhi Sen
Yang, Sherman Junjie
Tan, Daryl Hsien Yong
author2 Robert Kreuzbauer
author_facet Robert Kreuzbauer
Lio, Zhi Sen
Yang, Sherman Junjie
Tan, Daryl Hsien Yong
author_sort Lio, Zhi Sen
collection NTU
description The first thing that comes to mind when one considers the term ‘online consumer review’ is the number of stars. However, are there any other components of a review that affect our attitudes towards the product? The purpose of this study is to determine if and how the length of these reviews affects consumers’ purchase intentions and perceptions of trust of the reviews. In addition, it aims to explore if this effect is further moderated by other previously established variables, i.e. the average rating, number of reviews and the variance of ratings. A total of 192 university students took part in our experiment in which an online review was replicated. After viewing consumer reviews of various electronic products, we sought to determine their purchase intentions and also how much they actually trust the sources. The stimuli were presented in a foreign language to isolate the effects of length and minimize the semantic implications. Both the main effects and interaction effects were then examined. Our findings were indeed revealing. Consumers are indeed more attracted to longer reviews and were more convinced by it regardless of the content. Interestingly, the effect of the length of reviews is only moderated by changes in the variance of the ratings. Variables we thought to be important considerations, such as average rating and number of reviews, had no significant moderating effect. Of course in a real world setting, readers will most likely be affected by the actual content of the reviews. Also, due to resource constraints, the use of a between subjects design comparing across product categories was unavoidable. Nevertheless, this study provides us with a base from which future studies can be built upon. The significant effects of length on purchase intention and trust suggest that it might be beneficial for review sites to showcase their longest reviews first or to encourage reviewers to write lengthier reviews. However, the costs associated with these actions should be taken into account, especially for non e-commerce sites that do not sell the actual product. As an exploratory research paper, this study is the first to draw a concrete link between the length of reviews and consumers’ purchase intentions of a product. Whether this pattern is only limited to consumer electronics or varies among other product categories is something future studies might want to consider.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T04:55:33Z
format Final Year Project (FYP)
id ntu-10356/48117
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T04:55:33Z
publishDate 2012
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/481172023-05-19T06:24:05Z Online reviews : is longer really better? Lio, Zhi Sen Yang, Sherman Junjie Tan, Daryl Hsien Yong Robert Kreuzbauer Nanyang Business School DRNTU::Business::Marketing::Consumer behavior The first thing that comes to mind when one considers the term ‘online consumer review’ is the number of stars. However, are there any other components of a review that affect our attitudes towards the product? The purpose of this study is to determine if and how the length of these reviews affects consumers’ purchase intentions and perceptions of trust of the reviews. In addition, it aims to explore if this effect is further moderated by other previously established variables, i.e. the average rating, number of reviews and the variance of ratings. A total of 192 university students took part in our experiment in which an online review was replicated. After viewing consumer reviews of various electronic products, we sought to determine their purchase intentions and also how much they actually trust the sources. The stimuli were presented in a foreign language to isolate the effects of length and minimize the semantic implications. Both the main effects and interaction effects were then examined. Our findings were indeed revealing. Consumers are indeed more attracted to longer reviews and were more convinced by it regardless of the content. Interestingly, the effect of the length of reviews is only moderated by changes in the variance of the ratings. Variables we thought to be important considerations, such as average rating and number of reviews, had no significant moderating effect. Of course in a real world setting, readers will most likely be affected by the actual content of the reviews. Also, due to resource constraints, the use of a between subjects design comparing across product categories was unavoidable. Nevertheless, this study provides us with a base from which future studies can be built upon. The significant effects of length on purchase intention and trust suggest that it might be beneficial for review sites to showcase their longest reviews first or to encourage reviewers to write lengthier reviews. However, the costs associated with these actions should be taken into account, especially for non e-commerce sites that do not sell the actual product. As an exploratory research paper, this study is the first to draw a concrete link between the length of reviews and consumers’ purchase intentions of a product. Whether this pattern is only limited to consumer electronics or varies among other product categories is something future studies might want to consider. BUSINESS 2012-03-16T06:00:54Z 2012-03-16T06:00:54Z 2012 2012 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/48117 en Nanyang Technological University 22 p. application/pdf
spellingShingle DRNTU::Business::Marketing::Consumer behavior
Lio, Zhi Sen
Yang, Sherman Junjie
Tan, Daryl Hsien Yong
Online reviews : is longer really better?
title Online reviews : is longer really better?
title_full Online reviews : is longer really better?
title_fullStr Online reviews : is longer really better?
title_full_unstemmed Online reviews : is longer really better?
title_short Online reviews : is longer really better?
title_sort online reviews is longer really better
topic DRNTU::Business::Marketing::Consumer behavior
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/48117
work_keys_str_mv AT liozhisen onlinereviewsislongerreallybetter
AT yangshermanjunjie onlinereviewsislongerreallybetter
AT tandarylhsienyong onlinereviewsislongerreallybetter