A comparative review of social security systems : Singapore/New Zealand/France.
Social welfare is playing a big role in most countries in this day and age. Different governments around the world have implemented various schemes for the people’s benefit. This article aims to study the difference in the social security systems across the 3 countries and analyze the various levels...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Final Year Project (FYP) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/50823 |
| _version_ | 1826114373606703104 |
|---|---|
| author | Tan, Rachel Ziwen. Lim, Clement Daoyang. |
| author2 | Nanyang Business School |
| author_facet | Nanyang Business School Tan, Rachel Ziwen. Lim, Clement Daoyang. |
| author_sort | Tan, Rachel Ziwen. |
| collection | NTU |
| description | Social welfare is playing a big role in most countries in this day and age. Different governments around the world have implemented various schemes for the people’s benefit. This article aims to study the difference in the social security systems across the 3 countries and analyze the various levels of satisfaction by the citizens and the changes they would like to see implemented. Conclusions show that on the whole, Singaporeans are generally satisfied with the local system even though the other 2 other countries provide a wider array of schemes and benefits. It is also apparent that the 3 countries adopt rather different approaches to social welfare although all 3 share an identical objective; to provide the best welfare for their people. |
| first_indexed | 2024-10-01T03:38:26Z |
| format | Final Year Project (FYP) |
| id | ntu-10356/50823 |
| institution | Nanyang Technological University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-10-01T03:38:26Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | ntu-10356/508232023-05-19T03:30:05Z A comparative review of social security systems : Singapore/New Zealand/France. Tan, Rachel Ziwen. Lim, Clement Daoyang. Nanyang Business School Krishna Udayasankar DRNTU::Business::International business Social welfare is playing a big role in most countries in this day and age. Different governments around the world have implemented various schemes for the people’s benefit. This article aims to study the difference in the social security systems across the 3 countries and analyze the various levels of satisfaction by the citizens and the changes they would like to see implemented. Conclusions show that on the whole, Singaporeans are generally satisfied with the local system even though the other 2 other countries provide a wider array of schemes and benefits. It is also apparent that the 3 countries adopt rather different approaches to social welfare although all 3 share an identical objective; to provide the best welfare for their people. BUSINESS 2012-11-15T08:07:17Z 2012-11-15T08:07:17Z 2012 2012 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/50823 en Nanyang Technological University 69 p. application/pdf |
| spellingShingle | DRNTU::Business::International business Tan, Rachel Ziwen. Lim, Clement Daoyang. A comparative review of social security systems : Singapore/New Zealand/France. |
| title | A comparative review of social security systems : Singapore/New Zealand/France. |
| title_full | A comparative review of social security systems : Singapore/New Zealand/France. |
| title_fullStr | A comparative review of social security systems : Singapore/New Zealand/France. |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparative review of social security systems : Singapore/New Zealand/France. |
| title_short | A comparative review of social security systems : Singapore/New Zealand/France. |
| title_sort | comparative review of social security systems singapore new zealand france |
| topic | DRNTU::Business::International business |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/50823 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tanrachelziwen acomparativereviewofsocialsecuritysystemssingaporenewzealandfrance AT limclementdaoyang acomparativereviewofsocialsecuritysystemssingaporenewzealandfrance AT tanrachelziwen comparativereviewofsocialsecuritysystemssingaporenewzealandfrance AT limclementdaoyang comparativereviewofsocialsecuritysystemssingaporenewzealandfrance |