Political institutions and life satisfaction in transition countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia

Since they gained independence from the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, countries in Central Asia and Eastern Europe are in transition from a planned economy and authoritarianism to an open market economy and democracy. Although the installation of democracy and free markets is usually regarded to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dornbusch, Christina Jaya
Other Authors: Joel Selway
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/55158
_version_ 1811687880375926784
author Dornbusch, Christina Jaya
author2 Joel Selway
author_facet Joel Selway
Dornbusch, Christina Jaya
author_sort Dornbusch, Christina Jaya
collection NTU
description Since they gained independence from the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, countries in Central Asia and Eastern Europe are in transition from a planned economy and authoritarianism to an open market economy and democracy. Although the installation of democracy and free markets is usually regarded to be beneficial for individual well-being among the population in a given country, dissatisfaction with life is widespread among people in transition counties. Numerous studies have sought to explain this dissatisfaction with life by looking at economic and individual-level factors but have omitted the impact of political factors. This study is the first to investigate the impact of political institutions - specifically electoral rules and forms of government - on individual life satisfaction in transition countries. I merged individual life satisfaction data from the Life in Transition survey on 44477 individuals in 25 transition countries with data on electoral rules and forms of government and estimated a multi-level logistic regression model. I find that presidential systerns were better at increasing life satisfaction than other forms of government whereas proportional representation (PR) electoral rules where better at increasing life satisfaction than other types of electoral rules. Mixed political institutions, i.e. mixed electoral rules and semi-presidential forms of government had a significant negative impact on life satisfaction. In conclusion, this study shows that besides economic and individual-level factors political institutions matter for individual life satisfaction in transition countries.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T05:23:20Z
format Thesis
id ntu-10356/55158
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T05:23:20Z
publishDate 2013
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/551582020-11-01T08:21:35Z Political institutions and life satisfaction in transition countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia Dornbusch, Christina Jaya Joel Selway S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies DRNTU::Social sciences Since they gained independence from the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, countries in Central Asia and Eastern Europe are in transition from a planned economy and authoritarianism to an open market economy and democracy. Although the installation of democracy and free markets is usually regarded to be beneficial for individual well-being among the population in a given country, dissatisfaction with life is widespread among people in transition counties. Numerous studies have sought to explain this dissatisfaction with life by looking at economic and individual-level factors but have omitted the impact of political factors. This study is the first to investigate the impact of political institutions - specifically electoral rules and forms of government - on individual life satisfaction in transition countries. I merged individual life satisfaction data from the Life in Transition survey on 44477 individuals in 25 transition countries with data on electoral rules and forms of government and estimated a multi-level logistic regression model. I find that presidential systerns were better at increasing life satisfaction than other forms of government whereas proportional representation (PR) electoral rules where better at increasing life satisfaction than other types of electoral rules. Mixed political institutions, i.e. mixed electoral rules and semi-presidential forms of government had a significant negative impact on life satisfaction. In conclusion, this study shows that besides economic and individual-level factors political institutions matter for individual life satisfaction in transition countries. Master of Science (International Political Economy) 2013-12-27T04:21:32Z 2013-12-27T04:21:32Z 2013 2013 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10356/55158 en 65 p. application/pdf
spellingShingle DRNTU::Social sciences
Dornbusch, Christina Jaya
Political institutions and life satisfaction in transition countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia
title Political institutions and life satisfaction in transition countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia
title_full Political institutions and life satisfaction in transition countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia
title_fullStr Political institutions and life satisfaction in transition countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia
title_full_unstemmed Political institutions and life satisfaction in transition countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia
title_short Political institutions and life satisfaction in transition countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia
title_sort political institutions and life satisfaction in transition countries in eastern europe and central asia
topic DRNTU::Social sciences
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/55158
work_keys_str_mv AT dornbuschchristinajaya politicalinstitutionsandlifesatisfactionintransitioncountriesineasterneuropeandcentralasia