Comparison of the crack nucleation approach versus the crack growth approach
Stress and strain are two familiar terms to designers and that is why, in most rubber companies, surface tension strain, and strain energy density are the two terms most often used for the prediction of rubber failure. Tearing energy or crack growth approach, even thought it has been around since 19...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Thesis |
Published: |
2008
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/5530 |
_version_ | 1824453307044724736 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Pin |
author2 | Vahdati, Nader |
author_facet | Vahdati, Nader Zhang, Pin |
author_sort | Zhang, Pin |
collection | NTU |
description | Stress and strain are two familiar terms to designers and that is why, in most rubber companies, surface tension strain, and strain energy density are the two terms most often used for the prediction of rubber failure. Tearing energy or crack growth approach, even thought it has been around since 1920s, was hardly used in rubber industry due to its complexities and intensive computational needs. But with computers becoming faster every year, this method is more becoming the method of the choice. |
first_indexed | 2024-10-01T07:58:35Z |
format | Thesis |
id | ntu-10356/5530 |
institution | Nanyang Technological University |
last_indexed | 2024-10-01T07:58:35Z |
publishDate | 2008 |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | ntu-10356/55302023-03-11T17:28:41Z Comparison of the crack nucleation approach versus the crack growth approach Zhang, Pin Vahdati, Nader School of Mechanical and Production Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering::Mechanics and dynamics Stress and strain are two familiar terms to designers and that is why, in most rubber companies, surface tension strain, and strain energy density are the two terms most often used for the prediction of rubber failure. Tearing energy or crack growth approach, even thought it has been around since 1920s, was hardly used in rubber industry due to its complexities and intensive computational needs. But with computers becoming faster every year, this method is more becoming the method of the choice. Master of Science (Mechanics & Processing of Materials) 2008-09-17T10:52:45Z 2008-09-17T10:52:45Z 2004 2004 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10356/5530 Nanyang Technological University application/pdf |
spellingShingle | DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering::Mechanics and dynamics Zhang, Pin Comparison of the crack nucleation approach versus the crack growth approach |
title | Comparison of the crack nucleation approach versus the crack growth approach |
title_full | Comparison of the crack nucleation approach versus the crack growth approach |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the crack nucleation approach versus the crack growth approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the crack nucleation approach versus the crack growth approach |
title_short | Comparison of the crack nucleation approach versus the crack growth approach |
title_sort | comparison of the crack nucleation approach versus the crack growth approach |
topic | DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering::Mechanics and dynamics |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/5530 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangpin comparisonofthecracknucleationapproachversusthecrackgrowthapproach |