| Summary: | 不少学者将汉语的位移动词分成方式和路径两类（Chu，2004；马云霞，2008等）。但是，一些汉语学者如马云霞（2008）、范立珂（2013）和史文磊（未刊登）对“逃”、“追”、“赶”、“闯”、“冲”等几个动词的分类存在不一致的意见，而笔者察觉“逃”、“追”、“赶”、“闯”、“冲”似乎都带有“快速”的意思。因此，本文将以这五个动词为目标，探讨这五个动词究竟是方式动词还是路径动词。
本文使用不同的工具书、网络资料、前人文献以及语料库中的语料对“逃”、“追”、“赶”、“闯”、“冲”的语义进行分析。同时，本文也采用了前人对方式和路径信息的测试方法，对该五个动词进行测试。
笔者发现“逃”、“追”、“赶”、“闯”、“冲”带有较强的方式特征。另外，笔者也发现它们并没有蕴含“快速”的意思。 Motion verbs in Modern Chinese are often classified into manner-of-motion verbs and path verbs (Chu 2004, Ma 2008). However, there are different opinions when it comes to the classification of tao, zhui, gan, chuang,and chong,e.g.,Ma (2008), Fan(2013) and Shi(to appear). Given that all these five verbs seem to express motion at a fast rate, this paper aims to decompose these five verbs in order to find out whether they lexicalize manner of path information.
By using different reference books, online source, previous work as well as Chinese corpus data, this paper analyzes the semantics of tao, zhui, gan, chuang, and chong. In addition, building on tests of manner and path information in previous studies, this paper also attempts to identify whether these five verbs are path or manner-of-motion verb. This study finds that tao, zhui, gan, chuang,and chong exhibits the features of manner-of-motion verbs. In addition, this study also finds that these five verbs do not necessarily lexicalize a fast rate.
|
|---|