Preschoolers’ decisions in resource distribution : the effects of agents’ prosocial- antisocial behavior and group membership

Research looking at children’s sociomoral reasoning has commonly examined the principles of fairness, ingroup loyalty, and no-harm independently in Western cultures. However, less is known about how these principles can operate together to influence children’s behavior. Using a third-party resource...

Olles dieđut

Bibliográfalaš dieđut
Váldodahkki: Wang, Valerie Yunxi
Eará dahkkit: Setoh Pei Pei
Materiálatiipa: Final Year Project (FYP)
Giella:English
Almmustuhtton: 2016
Fáttát:
Liŋkkat:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/67341
_version_ 1826112149590638592
author Wang, Valerie Yunxi
author2 Setoh Pei Pei
author_facet Setoh Pei Pei
Wang, Valerie Yunxi
author_sort Wang, Valerie Yunxi
collection NTU
description Research looking at children’s sociomoral reasoning has commonly examined the principles of fairness, ingroup loyalty, and no-harm independently in Western cultures. However, less is known about how these principles can operate together to influence children’s behavior. Using a third-party resource distribution paradigm, the present study aimed to investigate how children’s distribution decisions and choice preferences would be influenced in contexts where a conflict between the principles of no-harm and ingroup loyalty arises. Three experiments were conducted on preschoolers in Singapore and it was predicted that an agent’s social behavior (antisocial or prosocial) and group membership would influence their decisions on resource distribution and their preferred agent. In Experiment 1 (n = 48), when no groups were assigned, results showed that 26- to 40-month-olds distributed more resources to a prosocial agent but did not express preference for the prosocial or antisocial agent. In Experiment 2 (n = 64), 30- to 43-month-olds distributed more resources to the prosocial agent when the ingroup agent was antisocial. However, 44- to 60-month-olds did not display any specific distribution patterns. In Experiment 3 (n = 32), 40- to 72-month-old boys, but not girls, distributed more resources to an ingroup member in both ingroup prosocial and ingroup antisocial conditions. Lastly, both Experiments 2 and 3 found that preschoolers favorably choose an ingroup agent, regardless of their social behavior. These findings suggest that preschoolers in Singapore are able to demonstrate moral considerations in contexts where sociomoral principles interact, and have implications in individuals’ moral expectations and decisions.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T03:02:14Z
format Final Year Project (FYP)
id ntu-10356/67341
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T03:02:14Z
publishDate 2016
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/673412019-12-10T12:57:06Z Preschoolers’ decisions in resource distribution : the effects of agents’ prosocial- antisocial behavior and group membership Wang, Valerie Yunxi Setoh Pei Pei School of Humanities and Social Sciences DRNTU::Social sciences Research looking at children’s sociomoral reasoning has commonly examined the principles of fairness, ingroup loyalty, and no-harm independently in Western cultures. However, less is known about how these principles can operate together to influence children’s behavior. Using a third-party resource distribution paradigm, the present study aimed to investigate how children’s distribution decisions and choice preferences would be influenced in contexts where a conflict between the principles of no-harm and ingroup loyalty arises. Three experiments were conducted on preschoolers in Singapore and it was predicted that an agent’s social behavior (antisocial or prosocial) and group membership would influence their decisions on resource distribution and their preferred agent. In Experiment 1 (n = 48), when no groups were assigned, results showed that 26- to 40-month-olds distributed more resources to a prosocial agent but did not express preference for the prosocial or antisocial agent. In Experiment 2 (n = 64), 30- to 43-month-olds distributed more resources to the prosocial agent when the ingroup agent was antisocial. However, 44- to 60-month-olds did not display any specific distribution patterns. In Experiment 3 (n = 32), 40- to 72-month-old boys, but not girls, distributed more resources to an ingroup member in both ingroup prosocial and ingroup antisocial conditions. Lastly, both Experiments 2 and 3 found that preschoolers favorably choose an ingroup agent, regardless of their social behavior. These findings suggest that preschoolers in Singapore are able to demonstrate moral considerations in contexts where sociomoral principles interact, and have implications in individuals’ moral expectations and decisions. Bachelor of Arts 2016-05-16T01:52:08Z 2016-05-16T01:52:08Z 2016 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/67341 en Nanyang Technological University 60 p. application/pdf
spellingShingle DRNTU::Social sciences
Wang, Valerie Yunxi
Preschoolers’ decisions in resource distribution : the effects of agents’ prosocial- antisocial behavior and group membership
title Preschoolers’ decisions in resource distribution : the effects of agents’ prosocial- antisocial behavior and group membership
title_full Preschoolers’ decisions in resource distribution : the effects of agents’ prosocial- antisocial behavior and group membership
title_fullStr Preschoolers’ decisions in resource distribution : the effects of agents’ prosocial- antisocial behavior and group membership
title_full_unstemmed Preschoolers’ decisions in resource distribution : the effects of agents’ prosocial- antisocial behavior and group membership
title_short Preschoolers’ decisions in resource distribution : the effects of agents’ prosocial- antisocial behavior and group membership
title_sort preschoolers decisions in resource distribution the effects of agents prosocial antisocial behavior and group membership
topic DRNTU::Social sciences
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/67341
work_keys_str_mv AT wangvalerieyunxi preschoolersdecisionsinresourcedistributiontheeffectsofagentsprosocialantisocialbehaviorandgroupmembership